Benmage wrote:Korlash, your top 3 scum reads please.
Sure. As soon as Yates answers my question.
Benmage wrote:Korlash, your top 3 scum reads please.
Knox wrote:I’m saying the outcome of the game would be better if we nailed scum on page 20. There would be more to work with the next day and for the rest of the game. Are you really saying more information is a bad thing? It is a very short sighted tactic.
Knox wrote:The town lost. It is not an individual game and you can’t pick and choose your team mates. You can blame incompetent town all you want but you still lost and the quick lynches were a factor in that.
Knox wrote:How about your reaction to it? I’m not saying it was a good test but it did make people take pause.
Knox wrote:I brought it up more so because the post in context looked forced and awkward and there was no need to bring it up. You were avoiding answering a question with a ‘der I’m town’. I never said scum claim they are town more than town. I’m just replying to you in the same manner that you did to me. Maybe I should have asked you to support your premise.
Knox wrote:Has anyone else in this game been at L-1? Well then that point was completely useless and taken out of context. I was referring to in other games. The only game I’ve read with you in it was Buffy which I skimmed but in that you expected iStark to claim when he was at L-1. So my question still stands.
Knox wrote:On a side note do you always insult people when they don’t agree with you?
↑ pappums rat wrote:I have played a number of games with MoI, and this performance does not look like one of his town games to me. Back in KGB mafia (a long time ago) I replaced ReaperCharlie, who was town. MoI had been goading RC all game and making him look scummy. Him trying to get Benmage and Fate to argue looks similar to me, and recalling that game strengthens my scumread on MoI. I think you should go ahead and claim considering V2V has expressed intent to hammer.
↑ pappums rat wrote:What, MoI, are you just going to completely ignore this point against you? LOL.
↑ MagnaofIllusion wrote:
KILL IT WITH FIRE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
No Town reason to actually be fucking fabricating evidence.
↑ MagnaofIllusion wrote:And by that I mean - you've not provided one bit of evidence that you've caught anything of the sort.
↑ MagnaofIllusion wrote:
Really? Provide that link. Again .. you are making references that you can't back up.
I'll take that 1v1 in a heartbeat. Commit to it in your next post!
↑ pappums rat wrote:Misrep me moar bro. I never said they were your partners, I said they have given off the most scumtells IMO. I wouldnt start talking about who your partners could be until after you were to flip scum.
↑ MagnaofIllusion wrote:I was scum there also.
Not at all. First, that isn't my initial issue with you. This was an additional argument we had regarding the scum value of not putting someone at L-1. You assigned that scum value while I did not. My argument is that this action is not scummy on its own. It does, however, become scummy AFTER a scum flip. I'm not assigning a point value to it but you earn scum credit if you don't/won't vote for scum. This is a very different argument.↑ MagnaofIllusion wrote:Um whut? Your original issue with me was that I called out Knox's "Hey I'd put you at L-1 but it's early" play as scummy. Now you agree with it?
↑ Yates wrote:Not at all. First, that isn't my initial issue with you. This was an additional argument we had regarding the scum value of not putting someone at L-1. You assigned that scum value while I did not. My argument is that this action is not scummy on its own. It does, however, become scummy AFTER a scum flip. I'm not assigning a point value to it but you earn scum credit if you don't/won't vote for scum. This is a very different argument.
↑ MagnaofIllusion wrote:
Doesn't matter who hammers me.
But you need to get that seventh vote. Until then I'll be rallying to get your lynched today.