pls. Some of us have other things to worry about.
I have an exam in 11 hours, will post after that, I think.
Cheery Dog wrote:
Two posts from day 1 aren't hard to read if you open the ISO.
and cocidering the quote you did pull up was mentioned by someone else yesterday, that as a whole seems to be put off.
↑ Cheery Dog wrote:You're too lazy/not good mooded to even look at page 1, where both his posts were, and I mentioned yesterday?
Sounds like scum not liking the need to scumhunt much to me.
If my own pay when I've been scum is any judge to your own, moods that stop your progress happen a lot more frequently if you already know the person you're getting information on's alignment.
↑ implosion wrote:↑ Cheery Dog wrote:You're too lazy/not good mooded to even look at page 1, where both his posts were, and I mentioned yesterday?
What the fuck are you talking about?
I isoed more than page one. I didn't even TALK about his day one posts - i just pointed out that he hadn't done much on day one. Hint hint, if he hadn't done much on day one theni'm going to read other things when i iso him.
I don't remember you posting about panzer yesterday - i skim a fair amount of the game, and i lost focus near the end of the day because, you guessed it, real life.
Sounds like scum not liking the need to scumhunt much to me.
Once again. How much i scumhunt is much much much more dependent on my mood than on my alignment. If you want proof of that then meta me, focusing on games that happened concurrently.
If my own pay when I've been scum is any judge to your own, moods that stop your progress happen a lot more frequently if you already know the person you're getting information on's alignment.
...:s. I don't think you understand what i'm saying. At all. I am not talkingat allabout my mood when i'm reading a game. There's this thing called real life, and I have a thing called a personality. They interact to create things called moods, and those things determine whether or not i open mafiascum at all (although that's an oversimplification because i'll often just check the thread with no intention of posting).
↑ Cheery Dog wrote:
The post you quoted was from day 1, therefore you are talking about that.
and as I'm in your cocurrent game, you probably know how this may continue.
~Mini Vote Count (9)
sword_of_omens (L-1) ~ Maxous, Messiah, IceGuy, Parama, implosion
IceGuy (L-2) ~ sword_of_omens, kanyeknowsbest, Lady Lambdadelta, Cheery Dog
Cheery Dog (L-4) ~ SpyreX, Panzerjager,(implosion, Parama)
implosion (L-6) ~ (Cheery Dog)
sword_of_omens (LYNCH) ~ Maxous, Messiah, IceGuy, Parama, implosion, SpyreX
IceGuy (L-2) ~ sword_of_omens, kanyeknowsbest, Lady Lambdadelta, Cheery Dog
Cheery Dog (L-5) ~(SpyreX,)Panzerjager
177 wrote:I don't think the flavor relates to what happened, at least I'm not going to be looking into it for other possible kill targets.
Safety makes sense as someone they may have directly killed.
Who he targeted doesn't matter in the scheme of things and attempting to guess etc just makes the rest of catching scum harder.
183 wrote:I can't see any hints as to who he was going to target, therefore I have nothing that well give useful information as to whether he was the intended target of the night kill or not.
Useless information and guesswork really won't get us anywhere.
185 wrote:When I posted that I thought he was flipping scum. ("the right decision")
My previous posts I could see why people were calling him scum, but wasn't convinced the lynch needed to happen then.
That response to delaying your reasoning seems valid and genuine to me.
UNVOTE: VOTE: panzer
192 wrote:He might want to, or he might not have thought about it. You can call it that if you want, by I'm not fully convinced by it.
(and I'm not aware of us knowing if the redirecting happens by moving the action or the target since I think both are still called the same thing)
I'm fine with an IceGuy lynch todayregardless of whether Safety targetted him or not.
But I'm out looking for more scum rather that just one plausible attempting defence from a quicklynch of a partner.
↑ SafetyDance wrote:In post 97, implosion wrote:
In post 95, SafetyDance wrote:
ERMAHGERD
INB4 LYNCHER
You should really stop all-capsing.
WE CAN CAPS IF WE WANT TOO
WE CAN LEAVE LOWER CASE BEHIND
COZ SCUM DON'T BLOCK AND IF THEY DON'T BLOCK
WELL, THEY'RE NO FRIENDS OF MINE.