Deadline is in
goodmorning is LA until Tuesday.
A_Stone is V/LA until Wednesday.
It's the truth, Rach. He's flooding the thread with silliness. He's overcompensating to make it look as though he has a strong presence. Sometimes two heads are better than one, but I do not need to see a Hydra posting something and then the second head confirming what the first head says. Less is more.Rach 65 wrote:RC what kind of reasoning is that to put someone at L-2?
If you have to ask, it's probably serious.MER 71 wrote:This post I’m less sure of joke post/random vote or serious vote?
Uh, what? This is the only game we're in together.Rach 77 wrote:Anyways yeah GM and RC sorry about that...
I just wanted to know whether to respond to not. D:soat 86 wrote:but your guilty conscious is noted...
watsoat 91 wrote:k
Go check every single game I've ever played and you'll see that this is just what I do.In post 101, RedCoyote wrote:It's the truth, Rach. He's flooding the thread with silliness. He's overcompensating to make it look as though he has a strong presence. Sometimes two heads are better than one, but I do not need to see a Hydra posting something and then the second head confirming what the first head says. Less is more.
I only now noticed it - brilliant xDIn post 102, RedCoyote wrote:Mod, how many of these lovely pictures do you have? I love these sort of jokes.
What's the problem? Did I do something wrong?In post 89, ² wrote:Why did you just move your vote when you were not going to just move your vote?
What are you voting A_Stone for?
gah. Hopefully I'll avoid posting with my main after this.In post 109, fferyllt wrote:Buldermar and I wondered about your reasons because we both think A_Stone looks pretty suspicious.
- f
That's what we think we're seeing in his posts, yes. I've been wondering if it struck anyone else that way.In post 112, syndromeofatown wrote:The main thing is he's used a whole lot of words to say a whole lot of nothing (at least nothing relevant to the game/finding scum) and his RVS vote seems... overreasoned I guess would be the word?
I don't plan to, seeing as it is.
In post 42, goodmorning wrote:It was at least 75% joking, but yeah, I'd forgotten that.In post 34, A_Stone wrote:Well, you did acknowledge that Slimer was Town because she did that... Unless I misread
Who's cheapvoting? My vote is 100% serious.
RVS is srs bznz.
He made a space pun. That's your definition of over-reasoning? Interesting.In post 112, syndromeofatown wrote:his RVS vote seems... overreasoned I guess would be the word?
Was a failed reaction test, as kinda brought up in whatever post it was that I got pissed off that nobody mentioned it. I think I've tried reaction testing onsite about three or four times and this is yet another failure in the chain of failures.In post 118, ² wrote:In post 42, goodmorning wrote:It was at least 75% joking, but yeah, I'd forgotten that.In post 34, A_Stone wrote:Well, you did acknowledge that Slimer was Town because she did that... Unless I misread
Who's cheapvoting? My vote is 100% serious.RVS is srs bznz.
LAWL HIIn post 117, thenewearth wrote:And GM is still V/LA from what I know.
I'll be coming back to this later.In post 119, goodmorning wrote:He made a space pun. That's your definition of over-reasoning? Interesting.In post 112, syndromeofatown wrote:his RVS vote seems... overreasoned I guess would be the word?
I think I've made it pretty clear already what I want you to do, and I don't buy that you've somehow missed it.In post 107, syndromeofatown wrote:What's the problem? Did I do something wrong?In post 89, ² wrote:Why did you just move your vote when you were not going to just move your vote?
What are you voting A_Stone for?
are you saying I should stay on redcoyote even though my gut is telling me town on him?? would you rather I just unvote and not vote anyone?
Except you claimed that you were on to something.In post 108, syndromeofatown wrote:my reason for anything this early in the game is basically idk gut