Open 491: The Popcorn Mafia: GAME OVER

JasonWazza · Post Post #825 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 8:08 am

So why not just make the case then?

P-Edit: The problem i have the post is that HE DIDN'T JUST DO IT

Ineffective · Post Post #826 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 8:27 am

In post 29, fuzzybutternut wrote:Yeah, 6 is the majority.

In post 110, fuzzybutternut wrote:I forget what the setup said. Can scum NK, or do they just choose another gun bearer?

In post 617, fuzzybutternut wrote:

Hmm.

Is Ineffective really a UN alt?

If so, shoot him.

Doing this point by point... Here we see what seems to be intentional dumbtells

There are a few others really recent that syriana quoted

Ineffective · Post Post #827 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 8:29 am

In post 815, fuzzybutternut wrote:Omg 3 scum?!

In post 817, fuzzybutternut wrote:I wouldn't. I want Jason alive.

Omg 3 scum? after second scum was shot

"i want jeremy alive" after he is dead

Ineffective · Post Post #828 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 8:30 am

Oh i misread jason for jeremy....

Ineffective · Post Post #829 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 8:34 am

In post 103, fuzzybutternut wrote:
In post 102, RachMarie wrote:ummm Fuzzy you realize votes dont count in this setup right?
My vote has a purpose, regardless of it's towards a lynch or not.
Shoot srand. Or shoot me, and I'll shoot srand.

In post 387, fuzzybutternut wrote:I haven't seen any major buddying.

It's not that everyone on the list is scum. In fact, I put you on there because 1.) I can't make heads or tails of who is scum, and 2.) I think you would make a good use of the gun.

DO NOT SHOOT ME.
I don't know who scum is, and I don't want to wind up in that position right now.

Read the second post as towny at first until i realised the blatent contradiction in sentiment from one of his first posts

JasonWazza · Post Post #830 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 8:40 am

Fuzzy make a compelling case as to why i shouldn't shoot you

@ everyone else, i am giving 24 hours before i shoot, say whatever you need to say.

Ineffective · Post Post #831 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 8:56 am

In post 162, fuzzybutternut wrote:Why would scum want to be shot? Then they die.

In post 289, fuzzybutternut wrote:Well, it's your decision who you want to shoot. You're going to shoot who you want anyway.

In post 299, fuzzybutternut wrote:He joined the second of April. 20 days ago.

In post 302, fuzzybutternut wrote:He may be, but epic mafia and MafiaScum are two completely different sites.

Stating the obvious

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #832 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 8:59 am

Compelling case?
Umm, I don't know who scum is, and I don't want to be shot. I'd like for you to survive, also.

Ineffective · Post Post #833 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 9:01 am

In post 128, fuzzybutternut wrote:
In post 127, Syryana wrote:OH GOD IT'S FUZZY KILL IT WITH FIRE

In post 718, fuzzybutternut wrote:Sure sure.
Def scum.

Reacting "sarcasticly" with emoticons in response to fosses

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #834 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 9:03 am

.........You're using emotes as a scum tell now?

JasonWazza · Post Post #835 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 9:04 am

In post 832, fuzzybutternut wrote:Compelling case?
Umm, I don't know who scum is, and I don't want to be shot. I'd like for you to survive, also.

Your not doing it right

Ineffective · Post Post #836 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 9:06 am

In post 100, fuzzybutternut wrote:VOTE: Srand

In post 263, fuzzybutternut wrote:VOTE: Catlord

there's something to post about.

In post 380, fuzzybutternut wrote:Syr
Srand
Ineffective

CrashTextDummie

Never giving reasons for fosses

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #837 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 9:07 am

In post 835, JasonWazza wrote:
In post 832, fuzzybutternut wrote:Compelling case?
Umm, I don't know who scum is, and I don't want to be shot. I'd like for you to survive, also.
Your not doing it right

Cool. So shoot scum then.

Ineffective · Post Post #838 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 9:08 am

In post 834, fuzzybutternut wrote:.........You're using emotes as a scum tell now?

No--- the combination of an implied scum claim with usage of emotes plus sarcasm struck me wrong

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #839 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 9:10 am

lol. Implied scum claim.
Because that happened.

Ineffective · Post Post #840 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 9:10 am

But ya i jokingly say emotes are a scumtell sometimes... And sometimes i actually believe it if it has the backdrop of awkward context like that... Also why did you. Post in RE: the emotes and not the other points

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #841 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 9:11 am

Because i didn't find it necessary, and that one was completely ridiculous.

Ineffective · Post Post #842 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 9:11 am

That "ya, sure, def scum (emote) was in response to a fos on you- it was an implied scum claim in the form of sarcasm with emotes---

Ineffective · Post Post #843 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 9:12 am

Im not saying you blatently claimed scum--- but your sarcastic jerk response looked very awkward --- how are you even denying that?

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #844 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 9:12 am

Uh, no, that was pure sarcasm. I thought that was obvious.

Ineffective · Post Post #845 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 9:14 am

In post 841, fuzzybutternut wrote:Because i didn't find it necessary, and that one was completely ridiculous.

So of the pool of obviously legitimate concerns you attack one post that may or may not be a tell? Instead of responding to the things that are almost universally indicative of scum posting?

Ineffective · Post Post #846 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 9:15 am

In post 844, fuzzybutternut wrote:Uh, no, that was pure sarcasm. I thought that was obvious.

THATS WHAT I FUCKING SAID.... YOUR SARCASM WAS IN THE FORM OF"YA IM SCUM" STOP PLAYING DUMB

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #847 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 9:16 am

What you call "universally indicative of scum posting" is actually not.

Stop scum raging. You called it an implied admittance that I was scum, and it wasn't.

Ineffective · Post Post #848 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 9:19 am

In post 847, fuzzybutternut wrote:What you call "universally indicative of scum posting" is actually not.

Stop scum raging. You called it an implied admittance that I was scum, and it wasn't.

actually - dumbtelling, posting obvious statements, not giving reasons for fosses because you dont have any reasons (consistantly)and lurking the entire thread in combination with each each other are ALMOST universally scum motivated--- as i said

also. I never said you "admitted" to being scum - i said you "implied a scumclaim using sarcasm" stop twisting my words

Ineffective · Post Post #849 (ISO) » Fri May 10, 2013 9:21 am

and the fact that you are still responding to that one post when i gave. A WEALTH of valid points to respond to (even if you consider that one in bad taste) shows me you have no defense or reason for your other actions