La Isla de la Muerte (Game over!)

[Sakura Hana]

I put my reason in my voting post, I said i agreed with the vote, you still called it baseless. You asked me

why a baseless vote is serious

not

why I was voting you

JESUS CHRIST

[Desperado]

I'm using it as a way to start discussion. Nice misrep. And you still haven't answered the question. Why should your vote be taken as serious? It can't be without a clear reason. You get one more chance to answer.

Scum post

JASON IS TOWN.
KLICK IS A JESTER.
SAKURA IS TOWN.
WAYNEGG IS PROBABLY TOWN.
DISCUSS.

Do you have any reasons?

VIBE
OBVIOUS
A LITTLE BIT OF META
GUT

A+ REASONS RIIIGHT HERE

Town posts. But check your gut it seems to be malfunctioning; wayne is scum.

Vote: wayne

[waynegg]

Fail.

I asked "A baseless vote is supposed to be taken as serious why?"

Which could also be asked

Why is a baseless vote supposed to be taken as serious?

Which could also be written

What's you're reason for voting me?

[Sakura Hana]

I asked "A baseless vote is supposed to be taken as serious why?"

Why is a baseless vote supposed to be taken as serious?

What's you're reason for voting me?

Top 2 are synonims.
The Last one is different.

[waynegg]

Don't lump bellasarias with me just because he has reading comprehension.

pedit which you obviously don't have.

[Sakura Hana]

More like learn to write.

It's not my fault for misrepping you if you don't ask the correct question, the fact that you're using that as a means to vote me, shows how scummy you are.

[waynegg]

All three of those questions ask for the reason behind your vote. They're the same.

[Sakura Hana]

The first 2 ask me the difference (or similarity as in your question) between a baseless vote and a serious vote.

[JasonWazza]

A baseless vote is supposed to be taken as serious why?

Why react to this MAN?

When there is other SHIT.

That needs reactions from YOU.

I think that someone LURKED.

And reacted to this POSTING.

So fuck you scum BUTT.

JASON IS TOWN.
KLICK IS A JESTER.
SAKURA IS TOWN.
WAYNEGG IS PROBABLY TOWN.
DISCUSS.

Klick introduced, but jesting BAH.

You have to have REASONS.

That shit don't fly HERE.

So logic can come OUT.

Then we might start BELIEVING.

And what part of WAYNEGG.

And his scum fucking WAYS.

Is probably town to YOU?



Sakura and Waynegg that DISCUSSION.

It's a waster of SPACE.

So stop filling this THREAD.

With all your guys WASTE.

JASON IS TOWN.
KLICK IS A JESTER.
SAKURA IS TOWN.
WAYNEGG IS PROBABLY TOWN.
DISCUSS.

Do you have any reasons?

VIBE
OBVIOUS
A LITTLE BIT OF META
GUT

A+ REASONS RIIIGHT HERE

Town posts. But check your gut it seems to be malfunctioning; wayne is scum.

Vote: wayne

Dude you trolling us RIGHT?

How that being town DUDE?

Read lists don't make TOWN.



Now will all you FUCKERS.

Quit making me think HARD.

Cause doing this shit POSTING.

Is fucking annoying me DUDES.

[waynegg]

More like learn to write.

It's not my fault for misrepping you if you don't ask the correct question, the fact that you're using that as a means to vote me, shows how scummy you are.

The fact that I'm voting you because you stated you have a reason for an action you've taken and that you can't provide said reason is scummy how?

[Desperado]

Fail.

I asked "A baseless vote is supposed to be taken as serious why?"

Which could also be asked

Why is a baseless vote supposed to be taken as serious?

Which could also be written

What's you're reason for voting me?

So you admit that you obfuscated the meaning of your question and took an accusatory disposition in doing so?

Awesome, now I don't have to explain why your interaction with Sakura is scum motivated. Thanks!

[Desperado]

Dude you trolling us RIGHT?

How that being town DUDE?

Read lists don't make TOWN.



Now will all you FUCKERS.

Quit making me think HARD.

Cause doing this shit POSTING.

Is fucking annoying me DUDES.

Don't see a whole lot of scum motivation in being open and forthright about early reads and immediately responding when someone asks you for reasons.

[Sakura Hana]

1) I had already provided said reason before you even asked, why would I think you'd be asking me for a reason for it?
2) You voted me for a misrep, when there's no misrep, in fact you're the one misrepping me, that's kinda funny actually

@Jason: It's relevant because he's trying to push me for not answering a quesiton that not only I had already answered but he never asked!

[waynegg]

You have poor reading comprehension or are obfuscating stupidity or ESL Sakura. Which is it?

pedit no. I asked a question which anyone with a tenth grade education should be able to deduce and answer.

pedit two you still haven't provided a reason for your vote. If you would like to quote where you did so, or even give it now that would be nice.

[waynegg]

Serious isn't a reason. It's a conclusion.

[waynegg]

And I don't think you know what obfuscated means Desparado's. it means falsified, which is clearly not the case.

[JasonWazza]

Dude you trolling us RIGHT?

How that being town DUDE?

Read lists don't make TOWN.



Now will all you FUCKERS.

Quit making me think HARD.

Cause doing this shit POSTING.

Is fucking annoying me DUDES.

Don't see a whole lot of scum motivation in being open and forthright about early reads and immediately responding when someone asks you for reasons.

Early reads can be FAKED.

And switching them ain't SCUMMY.

That's why read lists SUCK.

This early fake bussing RULES.

And buddying townies breaks RULES.

@Jason: It's relevant because he's trying to push me for not answering a quesiton that not only I had already answered but he never asked!

Arguing a good point ONCE.

Is not a bad THING.

But clearly he being STUPID.

And not choosing to LISTEN.

If he don't listen ONCE.

He won't listen second TIMES.

P-Editing cause Waynegg's a POSTING.

Dude your vote is SHIT.

She ain't misrepping any THING.

Semantics shouldn't be being ARGUED.

Forget it and find SCUM.

[Desperado]

Here's the bottom line: you thought he didn't give a reason, but you didn't ask him what his reason was, you applied meaning to it yourself (that's a baseless vote) and then asked rhetorically why a baseless vote should be taken seriously.

If you wanted to know why he was voting you, you did it wrong. And you did it wrong in a scum motivated way.

PEdit: No, it means to make something confusing. You

obfuscated

the intent of your inquiry (why are you voting me?) by beginning with the premise that his vote didn't have a reason at all, and so why should you take it seriously? It was scummy as fuck and you should get lynched for it (and for trying to argue semantics rather than address the main thrust of my accusation).

[Desperado]

Early reads can be FAKED.

And switching them ain't SCUMMY.

That's why read lists SUCK.

This early fake bussing RULES.

And buddying townies breaks RULES.

OK. I think the way he gave the reads was town.

[Sakura Hana]

Alright in that case i'll drop the argument, i'll leave my vote on him because of the

already specificed reasons

[waynegg]

Until she can answer the question, I feel I've found scum. I'll quote something from Sakura page two to bring it all together.

I'd think that a serious vote is less baseless than a random one by definition.

And following that definition, for something to be serious it has to have a reason to be serious. Which she has been unable to explain.

[waynegg]

That's just it Sakura. You haven't specified reasons for your vote. Finding reasons afterward doesn't validate nonreasons prior.

[JasonWazza]

Early reads can be FAKED.

And switching them ain't SCUMMY.

That's why read lists SUCK.

This early fake bussing RULES.

And buddying townies breaks RULES.

OK. I think the way he gave the reads was town.

How did he do IT?

Differently to the rest DUDE?

Motivation is the key DUDE.

So look for the KEY.

How was it differently MOTIVATED?

Tell me that then MAYBE.

I'll sit back and LISTEN.

Until she can answer the question, I feel I've found scum. I'll quote something from Sakura page two to bring it all together.

I'd think that a serious vote is less baseless than a random one by definition.

And following that definition, for something to be serious it has to have a reason to be serious. Which she has been unable to explain.

How is this silly ARGUMENT.

Meant to find us SCUM?

If your asking me DUDE.

Your argument is weak FOOL.

You assumed no reason THEN.

Made it seem scummy BUT.

Assuming someone has no REASON.

Is scummy on it's OWN.

Maybe start truely scum HUNTING.

And quit the semantic BULLSHIT.

P-Editing again Waynegg posting FOOLISHLY

What so now we CAN'T?

Have a vote out FIRST?

The fuck is this SHIT?

What the hell do YOU.

Think RVS is damn FOOL?

[waynegg]

So Jason, you find nothing at all scummy about a player saying they have a reason for taking an action and then failing to be able to even begin said reason? Because right now, Sakura is voting for me because I pressed for her reason which has STILL not been given for voting me. And you feel like that's sum good town postingz from her. Check...

[Desperado]

How did he do IT?

Differently to the rest DUDE?

Motivation is the key DUDE.

So look for the KEY.

How was it differently MOTIVATED?

Tell me that then MAYBE.

I'll sit back and LISTEN.

He gave reads unprompted, and his reasons for his reads weren't great (vibes, gut, little bit of meta) but he acknowledged that the reasons were weak and gave them anyway. He's town.