Varsoon wrote:506 : A bit late to be exploiting my posts for a mislynch, isn't it? No info is given in response to my posts, but just broad, victimizing speculation.
I posted what I felt about those posts. I didn’t post more of your posts because those were the ones that provided the most noise IMHO. However, I provided what I felt to be legitimate analysis of the posts, and it allowed me to take a starting stance.
510 : Doesn't seem to have experience with the Rach. Caught between a Rach and a hard place? Whatever gets his Rachs off. This post certainly can't stop the Rach. Okay, okay, I'm done. Really, though, I hate his buddy/corral of Muffin Man here and in the previous post. It's ugly.
1. I didn’t corral him. 2) The post 510 is NOT a buddying attempt. Try harder to paint me in a bad light. I merely told him to get off of the lynch, and that he “broke my heart,” which is actually a more common phrase of mine than you think for people that I believe to be town currently. For instance, your reads of a few people break my heart a bit.
629 : Gets so defensive with me, which is kinda cute, but not endearing in the least. Honestly, he assaults my character (you didn't read my posts approach), and somehow thinks his reads-list doesn't just parrot town sensibilities? Okay, sure. He even provided the qualifier of feeling weaker about scum, as if those reads could shift drastically given new evidence. Sounds real confident, individually progressive, and town. Wait, no, it's actually the opposite of that.
I’m not defensive. I’m pointing out posts that you obviously missed in an effort to actually be able to have a legitimate discussion and not a shitstorm involving you calling me some shallow and empty read. I rarely ever get defensive.
647 : I hate all the distance this slot keeps making with "You don't know/understand".
I made that comment a single time to someone who clearly did not have a grasp on the conversation and decided to interject at an inopportune time for them.
939 : Slips off my wagon when it's going nowhere to pursue an even easier one to push through to a mislynch? Oh, but I bet the reasons for it are soundly town and not something like, "I'm going to totally sheep Molliffy here, since it gives me the perfect reason to hop ships to a different wagon." Because, you know, that would only be like open admission to swapping to a wagon that you got consensus on before joining in scum-reading and then hopping when you saw an opportunity to do so! TheZMon would never implement such level-1 scum play! (Yeah bitches, the levels are back.)
Reach hard and misrep harder. I’ve always had a philosophy of wanting to lynch my best scumread whenever possible. If I have two very similar reads, then I’d be okay with leaving one for another if I’m not much more confident in the first. Of course, that’s not the case with Andy and Rach, because I DO feel I have something going here.
957 : It's a cool thing that you try to distance yourself from the scummy play of your slot earlier by being an insufferable elitist about it. Give me your number later cool guy, I want to go on a date and throw my drink at you and skip out on the bill. You'll probably call me scum for that, too, but won't hop on my wagon until a recognized townie does so. It's okay if you ironically refer to your play as scummy.
It’s pretty damn obvious that Bert’s play was seen as scummy by a number of people. However, when I came into the game, I played a much townier game, which is my reference. I am not saying he’s a bad player or whatever, but for the game I’ve played a better game for the town alignment.
1015 : You're okay with any mislynch, that's good. Oh, hey, hold on, what was that? "But nick is a bigger wagon and more support has been garnered for it." Where... is the town motivation for sheeping the Nick wagon again? I know you parroted reasons why -other- townies want Nick hung, but why do you get a pass when you're clearly playing Level 1 Scum? Well, at the very least, you're trying to consistently stay on a wagon that you support, rather than throwing your vote onto whatever wagon has mass-appeal, right?
See 939's point.
1354 : Well, at least, at the very least, TheZmon doesn't see it scummy when other people do the same thing as--"You go from championing a wagon... to immediately jumping ship the first logical sign of reasoning for mastin being town shows up? Anybody else get some whiplash here?" Okay, fuck it, I'm done. I give up. You're clearly yanking my chain or something. I bet you later go on to vote Rach, call more players useless, suffocate the IC, and tell people they are awful, don't understand, and CANNOT argue against you, for reasons that are poorly founded and contradict your play up to those points.
MS edit: Vig thezmon pls
Firstly, no. Just no. I didn’t champion a wagon until I decided I very, very much so wanted Rach lynched. Trust Fund was clearly the most vocal on the mastin wagon, and support was still garnered. Then, she switches when the first sign of something against the wagon that makes sense comes up. That is what I’m pointing to.
Secondly, go fucking misrep me harder.
