It seems a waste to vote someone if you can't even pretend to believe in it while pressured.In post 63, Goat on a Raft wrote:That's why we start the game with votes!
Why is that?In post 362, Goat on a Raft wrote:Also, yeah, Alfred is all sorts of right about quadz being town, in case our read wasn't clear enough.
Why did this matter again?In post 218, quadz08 wrote:I mean, I guess that Faraday could just flavor the scumteam as wights, but it doesn't seem like Faraday, especially when there are definitely a couple of explicitly undead characters that could get picked.
I sorta liked this.In post 267, quadz08 wrote:I don't put a ton of stock in my meta of players, but I just remember you being confident to the point of obnoxiousness. It stuck out in my head so felt it was worth mentioning. Plus, wanted to see what your response to being called out on it was.
In what kind of way? In a "they are both town" or "they are both scum" or "one is scum" kind of way?In post 298, quadz08 wrote:interesting.
Seems like a pretty scary thought to me too.In post 298, quadz08 wrote:I am extremely concerned that Andy is scum faking a Post Restriction, but that's :tinfoil: and has nothing substantiating it.
Why?
In post 437, quadz08 wrote:ooba, on the other hand, is someone who keeps making me go AHHH every time he posts and then I promptly forget about him in the sea of Not Shitty Posts that surround his play
Wanna join me on Goat? I still don't like quadz, but I can leave him alone for a second since there's some back and forth in his ISO.
Upon reread to determine whether I believe ooba is town, I now dislike the quoted quadz post a good deal. (incidentally, no verdict on ooba yet)In post 445, ooba wrote:- My reads are my contentIn post 441, quadz08 wrote:like seriously, check out ooba's iso
hello post
brief readslist
joke
explanation of joke
post 331, which is confusing at best and a misrep at worst
says he "still" reads elle as town after not mentioning outside of 331
response to question
asks about vote on himself
he has generated no actual content; his only reads were the initial readslist, his townread on elle, and then a couple of scumreads after Thor explicitly asked him to point out some scum for him
says he "still" reads elle as townafter not mentioning outside of 331
- elle is the first read on my "initial readslist"
"then a couple of scumreads after Thor explicitly asked him to point out some scum for him"
- This is a misrep that makes it sound like I never mentioned scumreads before this - kanye and Shadow were also mentioned in the "initial readslist" (although Cephrir and Garruk reduced on the scummy meter in the few pages in between)
- AlfredBow has not mentioned me anywhere except for the vote - so wanted to know why he thought I was scummy
They're probably second on my list of mild concerns. Perhaps down the line.In post 453, Nautilius wrote:Wanna join me on Goat? I still don't like quadz, but I can leave him alone for a second since there's some back and forth in his ISO.
Vote: Goat on a Raft
-In post 447, elleheathen wrote:Naked reads always give me a weird vibe when they come without any previous commenting. What strikes me as more odd there is that he has me, of all people, as his only town read in 271.
Doesn't provide anything further on his 'reads' as they are just 'vibes' but these vibes are apparently enough to vote on, just not to elaborate on? Ooba?
In 331, he misreps me by quoting a succession of posting that dubs it down to put me in the worst possible light (I really didn't need help there, yo!) but it's blank, not to mention erases what I am actually answering. When questioned on it, he says it was to 'get an explanation' but doesn't ask a question in the quotes with which to get a reaction.
@Ooba - If I'm your town read, why did you phrase the quotes to paint me as scummy - on top of an accusation of rolefishing on someone who'd already revealed their role? And why do you have me as town?
Can't tell exactly what part you're complaining about but it comes down to a theory thing and you're wrong about it so yah-boo-sucks.In post 450, Nautilius wrote:It seems a waste to vote someone if you can't even pretend to believe in it while pressured.
The reason we said "Alfred is right" specifically is because he hit the nail on the head in #353.Why is that?In post 362, Goat on a Raft wrote:Also, yeah, Alfred is all sorts of right about quadz being town, in case our read wasn't clear enough.
I'm going to guess that's meant to say whyIn post 449, Nautilius wrote: Why is self-voting bad if you're still self-voting in spirit?
Not so much aboutIn post 449, Nautilius wrote:I thrive in crowds where I don't know anyone and no one knows me. You shouldn't have a problem getting reads on people the usual way, right?In post 282, elleheathen wrote:But most of the scumhunting going on here is meta-based and I haven't played with a single person here -
Yeah, it probably isn't - but I think it's that he made two strong attempts at curttailing it. One that explained how it should be looked at and one that like 'nostahp'.In post 449, Nautilius wrote:Why? It seems pro-town, but not particularly difficult to replicate as scum.In post 447, elleheathen wrote:He got town points for stopping the attempted tunnel on the hydra issue that was taking the thread way off course.
Because I have Tammy as such a strong town read, initially yes, it lead me to believe Shadoweh might be scum. But their whole interaction confuses me (and I have a tendency to overthink things) and wanted a better idea on their flavors and to see what would happen when they found their hunky menz (thought it could be you with the 347 but no response to it from them) but:In post 449, Nautilius wrote:This suggests they are both third party or Shadoweh is scum, no?In post 447, elleheathen wrote:I can't really read - but something about the interaction between her and Tammy feels like they're on opposing sides but only between the two,
I'm complaining about all of it, mostly.In post 457, Goat on a Raft wrote:Can't tell exactly what part you're complaining about but it comes down to a theory thing and you're wrong about it so yah-boo-sucks.
The only decently strong position you've had all game is agreeing with Llamarble pretty much breaks my heart completely.In post 457, Goat on a Raft wrote:The reason we said "Alfred is right" specifically is because he hit the nail on the head in #353.
and it*In post 464, Nautilius wrote:agreeing with Llamarble pretty much breaks my heart completely.
This is what you quote:In post 456, ooba wrote: -"not to mention erases what I am actually answering."- so which part were you answering? It still isn't obvious.
This is what is actually there:In post 331, ooba wrote:Thor wrote:Also, seriously, my rolename will help you quantify the validity of the rather normal and pointed claim of 'Miller'?
...
How's that help your read of my roleclaim?elle wrote:P-Edit: It doesn't.
In post 328, Thor665 wrote: My vote on you is serious now.
How's that help your read of my roleclaim?
He says his vote is srs, which doesn't help my read of his roleclaim.In post 329, elleheathen wrote: P-Edit: It doesn't.
In post 456, ooba wrote: -"on top of an accusation of rolefishing on someone who'd already revealed their role"- ??
^In post 338, ooba wrote: - ShadowReh who isn't on the wagon but the reaction to the elle's rolefishing was pushing it
Meh. I find it weird because you posted it but didn't ask for this explanation you wanted until you were called out on the misrep and asked. If it were about seeing a response, it'd be one thing but you wanted anIn post 456, ooba wrote: -"@Ooba - If I'm your town read, why did you phrase the quotes to paint me as scummy"- I've already explained this. Either a self-contradiction on your part or a communication gap on my end - required an explanation. I approach the game like a puzzle to be solved - if there's a small piece that doesn't make sense, I want to see what that's about.
<3In post 448, Nautilius wrote:HEY WHY DON'T YOU HAVE A READ ON ME
must be a lot of workIn post 467, Goat on a Raft wrote:Yeah, we're working on it.
ya dawg
I liked his opening AND his response to quadz. It makes sense for him to withhold reasoning for his reads if he doesn't have strong things to back it up, and I liked the way that he responded to SSK (I could feel the same frustration behind his posts that I do when you don't get my jokes
), and I liked how he didn't try to fake any reasoning for it, just went for it. He just kinda owned quadz in his response, but the townie part was here:He added that bit in for clarification and it felt town to me because he was monitoring changes in his reads list, and i can see why pretty easily (cephrir and garruk both look pretty town right now), but I see no reason why he would have added that in as scum.In post 445, ooba wrote:- This is a misrep that makes it sound like I never mentioned scumreads before this - kanye and Shadow were also mentioned in the "initial readslist" (although Cephrir and Garruk reduced on the scummy meter in the few pages in between)