Marketplace Mafia III - Game Over


Forum rules
User avatar
Harakiri
Harakiri
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Harakiri
Goon
Goon
Posts: 288
Joined: October 7, 2013

Post Post #1225 (ISO) » Sat Oct 19, 2013 2:16 am

Post by Harakiri »

In post 949, Lord Mhork wrote:I mean I figured he'd probably flip town, but he also was an easy target with definite scum on the wagon.
If this is true why didn't you use Medium on him?
User avatar
Klick
Klick
Flash Forward
User avatar
User avatar
Klick
Flash Forward
Flash Forward
Posts: 9013
Joined: September 1, 2012

Post Post #1226 (ISO) » Sat Oct 19, 2013 2:16 am

Post by Klick »

So, I'm going to skip over the pages of the hydras that are hard to memorize "sorting" each other with meta from games I haven't read.

@bald: I'm not playing as well because this game is freaking fast and not pleasurable to play in.
User avatar
Magua
Magua
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Magua
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6109
Joined: January 18, 2009

Post Post #1227 (ISO) » Sat Oct 19, 2013 2:42 am

Post by Magua »

Vote Count 2.3


With 20 alive, it takes 11 to lynch.

VoidedMafia (5): morph the cat, BBmolla, Garuda, 1baldeagle1, Klick
ProHawk (2): VoidedMafia, Lord Mhork
Seanald (1): PeregrineV
Harakiri (1): ProHawk
morph the cat (1): Pyrotechnics

Not Voting (10): Nero Cain, Seanald, guille2015, Lost Butterfly, Banakai, uʍop ǝpısdn, zMuffinMan, Zdenek, DoctorPepper, Harakiri

Deadline for Day 2 is Friday, November 1st, at 2:00pm EST (site time).
Countdown to deadline:
(expired on 2013-11-01 13:00:00)
User avatar
Banakai
Banakai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Banakai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 683
Joined: July 12, 2013

Post Post #1228 (ISO) » Sat Oct 19, 2013 2:56 am

Post by Banakai »

What is this? page 50? I was only a few pages away until this happened.

I'd replace out but that wouldn't help any.
User avatar
morph the cat
morph the cat
Sync Achieved
User avatar
User avatar
morph the cat
Sync Achieved
Sync Achieved
Posts: 8828
Joined: July 14, 2013

Post Post #1229 (ISO) » Sat Oct 19, 2013 4:29 am

Post by morph the cat »

In post 1222, Pyrotechnics wrote:
gods i hope you flip scum. It will be so justifying.
I am not even a tiny bit sorry that we'll disappoint.

Though I guess the feeling is mutual in a way. It would be nice to think that at the end of this all, I'll look back and think "well of course, they were scum." But, I don't think so. I think you're town, and yet the disconnect is so vast and pervasive that we're not likely to overcome it.
User avatar
Zdenek
Zdenek
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Zdenek
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6827
Joined: August 30, 2010

Post Post #1230 (ISO) » Sat Oct 19, 2013 4:55 am

Post by Zdenek »

Can you say why you think the strong players are all town? I'm inclined to think that's not the case because of no one dying last night.
I have secret plans and clever tricks.
- The Enormous Crocodile.
User avatar
morph the cat
morph the cat
Sync Achieved
User avatar
User avatar
morph the cat
Sync Achieved
Sync Achieved
Posts: 8828
Joined: July 14, 2013

Post Post #1231 (ISO) » Sat Oct 19, 2013 5:16 am

Post by morph the cat »

In post 1230, Zdenek wrote:Can you say why you think the strong players are all town? I'm inclined to think that's not the case because of no one dying last night.
First off, who do you think are "the strong players"?

I don't necessarily think that the three players in my top town pile are beyond a shadow of a doubt all three town. But, I think at least two probably are and I think they'd be viewed as a serious threat.
User avatar
Zdenek
Zdenek
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Zdenek
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6827
Joined: August 30, 2010

Post Post #1232 (ISO) » Sat Oct 19, 2013 5:17 am

Post by Zdenek »

Why don't you answer my question?
I have secret plans and clever tricks.
- The Enormous Crocodile.
User avatar
Zdenek
Zdenek
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Zdenek
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6827
Joined: August 30, 2010

Post Post #1233 (ISO) » Sat Oct 19, 2013 5:18 am

Post by Zdenek »

In post 1106, morph the cat wrote:
In post 1104, Lost Butterfly wrote:
In post 1084, morph the cat wrote:I'm still waiting for someone with 2 brain cells to rub together to LOOK AT LAST NIGHT'S AUCTION and show the slightest indication that they see what we see in that, and what it means about the stronger players in this game. Because that one piece of hard evidence is more persuasive than all the walls I will ever write in this game.
I've worked this out despite my small brian!!!
My brain may very well be smaller than yours! But I was pretty excited when I did the math.
This is what I am talking about.
I have secret plans and clever tricks.
- The Enormous Crocodile.
User avatar
morph the cat
morph the cat
Sync Achieved
User avatar
User avatar
morph the cat
Sync Achieved
Sync Achieved
Posts: 8828
Joined: July 14, 2013

Post Post #1234 (ISO) » Sat Oct 19, 2013 5:26 am

Post by morph the cat »

In post 1233, Zdenek wrote:
In post 1106, morph the cat wrote:
In post 1104, Lost Butterfly wrote:
In post 1084, morph the cat wrote:I'm still waiting for someone with 2 brain cells to rub together to LOOK AT LAST NIGHT'S AUCTION and show the slightest indication that they see what we see in that, and what it means about the stronger players in this game. Because that one piece of hard evidence is more persuasive than all the walls I will ever write in this game.
I've worked this out despite my small brian!!!
My brain may very well be smaller than yours! But I was pretty excited when I did the math.
This is what I am talking about.
I was talking about my townbloc. And like I said not beyond a shadow of a doubt. The pattern we see in the auction results could be driven by scum concerns about strong players that aren't in my top townpile as well as those three.

Cabd and I need to discuss last night's posts when he's back online. I have a read that's in flux at the moment, so I want to wait to answer this in more detail.
User avatar
Lord Mhork
Lord Mhork
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Lord Mhork
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5201
Joined: October 26, 2011
Location: Clackamas, OR

Post Post #1235 (ISO) » Sat Oct 19, 2013 5:34 am

Post by Lord Mhork »

In post 1225, Harakiri wrote:
In post 949, Lord Mhork wrote:I mean I figured he'd probably flip town, but he also was an easy target with definite scum on the wagon.
If this is true why didn't you use Medium on him?
Because I couldn't? I don't understand your point.
Show
Seven Deadly Sins. Six thrilling chapters. One epic adventure.
Pathfinder: Rise of the Runelords
Chapter One: Burnt Offerings


~
Get to Know a Mhork
~
User avatar
Voidedmafia
Voidedmafia
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Voidedmafia
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9106
Joined: January 29, 2011
Contact:

Post Post #1236 (ISO) » Sat Oct 19, 2013 5:34 am

Post by Voidedmafia »

In post 1078, morph the cat wrote:BECAUSE NACHO.
It's perfectly acceptable to disregard whatever compulsion you have to sheep Nacho (or whatever) if your reads are that contrary, yknow. :?
In post 1084, morph the cat wrote:I'm still waiting for someone with 2 brain cells to rub together to LOOK AT LAST NIGHT'S AUCTION and show the slightest indication that they see what we see in that, and what it means about the stronger players in this game. Because that one piece of hard evidence is more persuasive than all the walls I will ever write in this game.
Would you rather I posted what I thought about it?
In post 1098, Harakiri wrote:I'm going to be quite frank, I was planning to make an effort today. But, truthfully, I don't want anything to possibly do with this game. It so inbred and hatefilled I'm not having a lick of fun even reading it. I'm not abandoning my hydra partner, though, so I'm stuck here. No one wants to have fun all just bitchbitchbitch, ugh. Actually giving me a headache more so than I already have.
I'm probably just going to townread/null-townread everyone I agree with because sorting out Pyro, et al., is starting to get tiring.
In post 1102, morph the cat wrote:Because I'm telling you I think it's pretty damn significant?
...And that absolves you of avoiding someone and only poking fun at them, how?
In post 1106, morph the cat wrote:My brain may very well be smaller than yours! But I was pretty excited when I did the math.
...nvm, I don't think I get it.
In post 1126, morph the cat wrote:
In post 1, Magua wrote:Night-kill x 1 (Targeted): Choose another player. That player will die.
If you are a Mafia member, this will fail if you target another Mafia member unless you choose otherwise.
I guess that does answer the "why no kill if the NK went to scum?" question.

So, how do you feel about PV right now?
In post 1129, Pyrotechnics wrote:Well since ye actually read the last 4 pages, let's get some opinions.

Town v town?
Town v scum?
Scum v scum?
...
etc.
It's an annoying waste of time, that's my opinion.
In post 1134, morph the cat wrote:
In post 883, Lord Mhork wrote:So scum decided to no kill?
In post 884, Harakiri wrote:My theory is that they are stacking up the night kills to use them all later, or the night kill was won by town on N0.

vote: Prohawk
^Are both of these legit townslips, not-on-killing-team slips, or neither? It does bug me that the mechanical head of 'kiri would think town somehow won night kill when it went for 151, and town max budget at that time was under that.
...hmmm. Though, 'kiri's referring to N0's NK, not N1's. Your point stands, but.

Relevantly, I'm not entirely willing to call either of these townslips. Mhork posited a legit question, while kiri's post holds up more as a likely not-on-NK-team slip than a townslip.
In post 1136, Harakiri wrote:WRONG. In regards to which head said that, at least.
So which head DID say it?
In post 1147, uʍop ǝpısdn wrote:Nero? Has he even said anything?
Not today, nope.
In post 1151, uʍop ǝpısdn wrote:This is probably getting into MD stuffs, but why is this? I understand it in a micro or a mini or a newbie, where an early no lynch will put the game into evens and probably results in another no lynch at mylo, but this is a large with lots of abilities that can stop kills etc.
But were any of those kill stopping abilities owned by town or even available N0? Were they available N1? No and yes. Furthermore, I do think that having some kind of flip to work with via lynches certainly helps solidify reads (either through how people got the lynch through, or just from the lynch alone). Doc protects are a good way to avoid losing more when a townie is accidentally lynch (so long as they protect correctly), but just because the ability's there and just because this is a large doesn't mean that no-lynching should always be an option in the back of our heads.

Besides, no-lynching in that situation is still stupid to me. Doing that and trying to make the most on short time is better than just doing nothing because we suddenly only had 3 days to do anything.
In post 1160, uʍop ǝpısdn wrote:You don't think he added anyone last night?
I don't think PV-scum'd lose much by fishing for a partner N1, so long as it wasn't a blind toss. I would hope that if he is on a team they used other means to find scum last night. (and one in particular)
In post 1164, uʍop ǝpısdn wrote:What ProHawk is saying today is consistent with what he was saying yesterday. I don't see anything scummy in that.
So what led him to think Hermy was obvtown, then?
In post 1167, uʍop ǝpısdn wrote:Why would scum have bid exactly $100 on Neighborizer? Why would they not go that extra dollar to make sure they get it?
How likely is it that the scumteam who did win Neighborizor had already put enough money elsewhere that even $100 is the most they could put?
In post 1168, Pyrotechnics wrote:that was syry :/
...hrmmm... :?

(one more cut here, 48-50 next.)
2011 scummies winner (BTS help) and participant;

coming back to Mafia...slowly. Keep an eye for me as a mod.
Also keep an eye for setup review requests.
User avatar
Voidedmafia
Voidedmafia
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Voidedmafia
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9106
Joined: January 29, 2011
Contact:

Post Post #1237 (ISO) » Sat Oct 19, 2013 6:00 am

Post by Voidedmafia »

That's nice, dear. Now shush.

Plus, your insistence on this is getting scummy.
In post 1191, Pyrotechnics wrote:In kingdom hearts he was killed night one for well no one knows why.
...That feels like a very accurate description of how I felt. I suspect it was PR-hunting, tho.
In post 1191, Pyrotechnics wrote:the last time I talked to syry he had him as a scum read.
Ask him why he scumread me?

(Also, was that post I thought was towntammy really from Syr?)
In post 1200, uʍop ǝpısdn wrote:Yeah, I'm not some kind of egotistical loser!
...Right.
In post 1201, uʍop ǝpısdn wrote:Hey, so can everyone give me their money tonight so we can win all the stuff?
No.
In post 1203, uʍop ǝpısdn wrote:Also, anyone who disagrees with the
FACT
that Quilford is towny town is probably broken.
...It's not a fact, and the fact that you're tying to say it's a fact is in fact pinging my scumdar.
Now this is getting annoying and scummy. Why are you continuing this line instead of doing other, more helpful things?
In post 1208, uʍop ǝpısdn wrote:Didn't you guys just have this argument?
About PV? That seemed to be pushed aside for more *ahem* "relevant" conversations <_<.
Lovely. Now explain.
In post 1214, uʍop ǝpısdn wrote:Hey Voided when do you plan on using your doublevote?
idk. Why should I be thinking about using it now? I don't plan on just activating it one day for the sake of activating it, but would rather use it near the time that actual wagons start forming today or on later days. (in retrospect, I suppose I could've used it yesterday on Hermy, but I think that not using it was the better option.)
In post 1220, Pyrotechnics wrote:Oh and if anyone is wondering why this is N scum. This is fake content. He can't possibly be concerned over whether or not I would carry on my neighborizer crusade. if you look at the way he interacted with me yesterday, there was no indication whatsoever that he believed in my opinions on the neighborizer. So, why is he he trying to distract the conversation between morph and I regarding town working together? I mean Morph is doing the perfect fake rendition of looking like they're working together, and N is trying to pull up something from the day before and trying to make a big deal out of it even though the entirety of the game has sided against me on the matter. So, why is he trying to make a big deal with me about it? He's scum, that's why.
I think I can see this. UD's in the scummy pile.
In post 1224, 1baldeagle1 wrote:Scum is Voided and Klick. Not sure about Nero.
That's nice how you avoided answering anything I put toward you.
In post 1226, Klick wrote:So, I'm going to skip over the pages of the hydras that are hard to memorize "sorting" each other with meta from games I haven't read.

@bald: I'm not playing as well because this game is freaking fast and not pleasurable to play in.
start by explaining why I'm a scumread.
In post 1232, Zdenek wrote:Why don't you answer my question?
zdenek earned 1 idiot point!

Also, why would you just focus there? I get it if you're just trying to find someplace to start, but it feels like there might be someplace better to work with.

...phoo, finally done. Prohawk, baldeagle, upside down, Klick (to an extent) and morph are in my scumpile. Pyro and LB are the two most definite townreads that I have (not strongest, mind, just the ones I'm confident in being town). I still feel that prohawk should be lynched, but it seems that there is not enough support for it.

Vote: Baldeagle
2011 scummies winner (BTS help) and participant;

coming back to Mafia...slowly. Keep an eye for me as a mod.
Also keep an eye for setup review requests.
User avatar
Lord Mhork
Lord Mhork
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Lord Mhork
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5201
Joined: October 26, 2011
Location: Clackamas, OR

Post Post #1238 (ISO) » Sat Oct 19, 2013 6:06 am

Post by Lord Mhork »

Voided, baldeagle is a bad target. He's fairly town...
Show
Seven Deadly Sins. Six thrilling chapters. One epic adventure.
Pathfinder: Rise of the Runelords
Chapter One: Burnt Offerings


~
Get to Know a Mhork
~
User avatar
morph the cat
morph the cat
Sync Achieved
User avatar
User avatar
morph the cat
Sync Achieved
Sync Achieved
Posts: 8828
Joined: July 14, 2013

Post Post #1239 (ISO) » Sat Oct 19, 2013 6:31 am

Post by morph the cat »

In post 1236, Voidedmafia wrote:
In post 1078, morph the cat wrote:BECAUSE NACHO.
It's perfectly acceptable to disregard whatever compulsion you have to sheep Nacho (or whatever) if your reads are that contrary, yknow. :?
My reads aren't to the contrary though. My read on Pyro would have been hellifino-null. In cases where I can't figure someone out, I often take the opinions of people I'm town-reading into account to move the nulls up or down my lists.

Despite the protestations to the contrary, putting them in my 2nd-tier town on the basis of a Nacho endorsement was a reach-out.
In post 1084, morph the cat wrote:I'm still waiting for someone with 2 brain cells to rub together to LOOK AT LAST NIGHT'S AUCTION and show the slightest indication that they see what we see in that, and what it means about the stronger players in this game. Because that one piece of hard evidence is more persuasive than all the walls I will ever write in this game.
Would you rather I posted what I thought about it?
Why would you ask this?
In post 1102, morph the cat wrote:Because I'm telling you I think it's pretty damn significant?
...And that absolves you of
avoiding someone
and only poking fun at them, how?
laughed out loud for reals.
In post 1106, morph the cat wrote:My brain may very well be smaller than yours! But I was pretty excited when I did the math.
...nvm, I don't think I get it.
ok.
In post 1126, morph the cat wrote:
In post 1, Magua wrote:Night-kill x 1 (Targeted): Choose another player. That player will die.
If you are a Mafia member, this will fail if you target another Mafia member unless you choose otherwise.
I guess that does answer the "why no kill if the NK went to scum?" question.

So, how do you feel about PV right now?
That was Cabd, but I'll answer. He's a person of concern. Lots of concern.
In post 1134, morph the cat wrote:
In post 883, Lord Mhork wrote:So scum decided to no kill?
In post 884, Harakiri wrote:My theory is that they are stacking up the night kills to use them all later, or the night kill was won by town on N0.

vote: Prohawk
^Are both of these legit townslips, not-on-killing-team slips, or neither? It does bug me that the mechanical head of 'kiri would think town somehow won night kill when it went for 151, and town max budget at that time was under that.
...hmmm. Though, 'kiri's referring to N0's NK, not N1's. Your point stands, but.

Relevantly, I'm not entirely willing to call either of these townslips. Mhork posited a legit question,
while kiri's post holds up more as a likely not-on-NK-team slip than a townslip
.
How so?
In post 1151, uʍop ǝpısdn wrote:This is probably getting into MD stuffs, but why is this? I understand it in a micro or a mini or a newbie, where an early no lynch will put the game into evens and probably results in another no lynch at mylo, but this is a large with lots of abilities that can stop kills etc.
But were any of those kill stopping abilities owned by town or even available N0? Were they available N1? No and yes. Furthermore, I do think that having some kind of flip to work with via lynches certainly helps solidify reads (either through how people got the lynch through, or just from the lynch alone). Doc protects are a good way to avoid losing more when a townie is accidentally lynch (so long as they protect correctly), but just because the ability's there and just because this is a large doesn't mean that no-lynching should always be an option in the back of our heads.

Besides, no-lynching in that situation is still stupid to me. Doing that and trying to make the most on short time is better than just doing nothing because we suddenly only had 3 days to do anything.
This reads like you're scum annoyed with the other-scum team.
In post 1160, uʍop ǝpısdn wrote:You don't think he added anyone last night?
I don't think PV-scum'd lose much by fishing for a partner N1, so long as it wasn't a blind toss. I would hope that if he is on a team they used other means to find scum last night. (and one in particular)
This too, though it's a little confusing because it would be from the PoV of the opposite scum team unless I'm missing something here.
User avatar
morph the cat
morph the cat
Sync Achieved
User avatar
User avatar
morph the cat
Sync Achieved
Sync Achieved
Posts: 8828
Joined: July 14, 2013

Post Post #1240 (ISO) » Sat Oct 19, 2013 6:35 am

Post by morph the cat »

In post 1237, Voidedmafia wrote:
In post 1232, Zdenek wrote:Why don't you answer my question?
zdenek earned 1 idiot point!

Also, why would you just focus there? I get it if you're just trying to find someplace to start, but it feels like there might be someplace better to work with.

...phoo, finally done. Prohawk, baldeagle, upside down, Klick (to an extent) and morph are in my scumpile. Pyro and LB are the two most definite townreads that I have (not strongest, mind, just the ones I'm confident in being town). I still feel that prohawk should be lynched, but it seems that there is not enough support for it.

Vote: Baldeagle
You pick 1) someone who's been pretty obvtown so far and 2) the least experienced/lowest hanging fruit in your pile. Are you afraid that TammySyr won't get enough traction on us today?
User avatar
Lord Mhork
Lord Mhork
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Lord Mhork
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5201
Joined: October 26, 2011
Location: Clackamas, OR

Post Post #1241 (ISO) » Sat Oct 19, 2013 6:46 am

Post by Lord Mhork »

Here I'll make this easier on you, voided.

VOTE: Nero

Now you can sheep a better wagon with more traction.
Show
Seven Deadly Sins. Six thrilling chapters. One epic adventure.
Pathfinder: Rise of the Runelords
Chapter One: Burnt Offerings


~
Get to Know a Mhork
~
User avatar
1baldeagle1
1baldeagle1
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
1baldeagle1
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1955
Joined: July 28, 2013

Post Post #1242 (ISO) » Sat Oct 19, 2013 6:57 am

Post by 1baldeagle1 »

Voided, you do realize you have been obsessing over the votes on you ever since the wagons started on you both days, right?
You can find my meta on my wiki.
User avatar
1baldeagle1
1baldeagle1
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
1baldeagle1
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1955
Joined: July 28, 2013

Post Post #1243 (ISO) » Sat Oct 19, 2013 6:59 am

Post by 1baldeagle1 »

In post 855, Voidedmafia wrote:
In post 845, uʍop ǝpısdn wrote:governor? really?
Ayup. I say we lynch him tomorrow.
Also, note where Voided says I need to be lynched tomorrow, thus calling me the scummiest. (This was on Day 1)

And look how long it took for Voided to vote me. He posted quite a few times before he realized that he was being inconsistent with the scumread on me and tries to vote me. He hopes that the vote will cover up his inconsist read.
You can find my meta on my wiki.
User avatar
Voidedmafia
Voidedmafia
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Voidedmafia
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9106
Joined: January 29, 2011
Contact:

Post Post #1244 (ISO) » Sat Oct 19, 2013 7:07 am

Post by Voidedmafia »

In post 1238, Lord Mhork wrote:Voided, baldeagle is a bad target. He's fairly town...
Not to me, he hasn't.
In post 1239, morph the cat wrote:My reads aren't to the contrary though.
At the time, though, it seemed like they were. Hence why I said that.
In post 1239, morph the cat wrote:Despite the protestations to the contrary, putting them in my 2nd-tier town on the basis of a Nacho endorsement was a reach-out.
reach out for what?
In post 1239, morph the cat wrote:Why would you ask this?
Because I wanted to know if you wanted discourse over it or if you just wanted people to try and see what you saw on their own.
In post 1239, morph the cat wrote:That was Cabd, but I'll answer. He's a person of concern. Lots of concern.
And how is he a person of concern? A lack of posting? A lack of presence? Both? The fact that he has neighborizer? *insert other option(s)*?
In post 1239, morph the cat wrote:How so?
Honestly, I can't give you a straight "here's why" answer. I just don't see hara-kiri's post as a townslip.
In post 1240, morph the cat wrote:You pick 1) someone who's been pretty obvtown so far and 2) the least experienced/lowest hanging fruit in your pile. Are you afraid that TammySyr won't get enough traction on us today?
1.) I don't see why Bald's been obvtown. Feel free to enlighten me.

2.) Uh, no. I've just felt that Bald has been scum, and I honestly don't see why he's town. Prohawk topped him in scumminess come the start of D2, which is why I was going for him most of today. If not bald or pro, then I'd be voting upside.
In post 1241, Lord Mhork wrote:Here I'll make this easier on you, voided.

VOTE: Nero

Now you can sheep a better wagon with more traction.
I'm undecided on Nero, tho. upside down's a more developed read of mine.
In post 1242, 1baldeagle1 wrote:Voided, you do realize you have been obsessing over the votes on you ever since the wagons started on you both days, right?
And this makes me scum, how?
In post 1243, 1baldeagle1 wrote:Also, note where Voided says I need to be lynched tomorrow, thus calling me the scummiest. (This was on Day 1)

And look how long it took for Voided to vote me. He posted quite a few times before he realized that he was being inconsistent with the scumread on me and tries to vote me. He hopes that the vote will cover up his inconsist read.
There s such a thing as someone being scummier than you, yknow. I'm sorry that you got eclipsed if only for the span of a couple/few IRL days and have to paint this in a scummy light to push your read on me. :roll:
2011 scummies winner (BTS help) and participant;

coming back to Mafia...slowly. Keep an eye for me as a mod.
Also keep an eye for setup review requests.
User avatar
Lord Mhork
Lord Mhork
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Lord Mhork
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5201
Joined: October 26, 2011
Location: Clackamas, OR

Post Post #1245 (ISO) » Sat Oct 19, 2013 7:12 am

Post by Lord Mhork »

But voided. Pressure on Nero is all upside.
Show
Seven Deadly Sins. Six thrilling chapters. One epic adventure.
Pathfinder: Rise of the Runelords
Chapter One: Burnt Offerings


~
Get to Know a Mhork
~
User avatar
Lost Butterfly
Lost Butterfly
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Lost Butterfly
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2429
Joined: October 15, 2010

Post Post #1246 (ISO) » Sat Oct 19, 2013 7:13 am

Post by Lost Butterfly »

Voided can you just explain why baldagle is scum in like a short paragraph that I can actually read without scrolling.
Mafiascum Fantasy Camp 2 - Day 7 ongoing
User avatar
Lost Butterfly
Lost Butterfly
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Lost Butterfly
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2429
Joined: October 15, 2010

Post Post #1247 (ISO) » Sat Oct 19, 2013 7:23 am

Post by Lost Butterfly »

Voided who are your townreads at the moment?
Mafiascum Fantasy Camp 2 - Day 7 ongoing
User avatar
morph the cat
morph the cat
Sync Achieved
User avatar
User avatar
morph the cat
Sync Achieved
Sync Achieved
Posts: 8828
Joined: July 14, 2013

Post Post #1248 (ISO) » Sat Oct 19, 2013 7:52 am

Post by morph the cat »

In post 1236, Voidedmafia wrote:
In post 1239, morph the cat wrote:Despite the protestations to the contrary, putting them in my 2nd-tier town on the basis of a Nacho endorsement was a reach-out.
reach out for what?
Discussion and maybe movement toward consensus on a few things where we strongly differ. I'm not holding my breath but stranger things have happened.

This game is becoming reminiscent of the Walking Dead mafia game in some ways. Nacho and I hydra'd in that one and it seemed like we spent most of the game trying to get our town reads to stop FoSing and voting each othere. In that game, one of the town reads was actually scum and was the source of a lot of the friction and disintegration in the town bloc. It's too early to call that in this game, and I'm not getting the same vibe at all. I think the friction comes from genuinely differing points of view about other players.
In post 1239, morph the cat wrote:Why would you ask this?
Because I wanted to know if you wanted discourse over it or if you just wanted people to try and see what you saw on their own.
I don't plan to explain what I'm seeing this early. I'm curious to see if someone else independently comes up with it.
In post 1239, morph the cat wrote:That was Cabd, but I'll answer. He's a person of concern. Lots of concern.
And how is he a person of concern? A lack of posting? A lack of presence? Both? The fact that he has neighborizer? *insert other option(s)*?
Above all, the neighborizer claim. If he's town and was able to grab it, he's in a strong position to help set the course here. He's not using that position so far, e.g., lack of posting/presence.
In post 1239, morph the cat wrote:How so?
Honestly, I can't give you a straight "here's why" answer. I just don't see hara-kiri's post as a townslip.
Ok.
In post 1240, morph the cat wrote:You pick 1) someone who's been pretty obvtown so far and 2) the least experienced/lowest hanging fruit in your pile. Are you afraid that TammySyr won't get enough traction on us today?
1.) I don't see why Bald's been obvtown. Feel free to enlighten me.
ISO me and search his name.
2.) Uh, no. I've just felt that Bald has been scum, and I honestly don't see why he's town. Prohawk topped him in scumminess come the start of D2, which is why I was going for him most of today. If not bald or pro, then I'd be voting upside.
And I can't see the basis for either of those reads.
User avatar
Nero Cain
Nero Cain
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Nero Cain
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 44912
Joined: December 6, 2009

Post Post #1249 (ISO) » Sat Oct 19, 2013 8:12 am

Post by Nero Cain »

The push on Pro-Hawk is crap. I can see where Klick's push on Pro-Hawk might look oppertunistic but its Klick and he always seems scummy as fuck to me so idk.

Just finished p. 39
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

edited c.s. lewis quote b/c limit
Locked