Open 534 - Killing at the Frat (Day 5)

[EspeciallyTheLies]

When you've had the worst 3 days of your life then maybe you'll see why I'm just fluffing around

I'm sorry you are having a rough time in RL, but that is not a reason to take it out on other people. You can use your words more constructively to get the same ideas across without insulting others and acting generally abusive. If you are not doing well, I might suggest seeking a replacement so you can handle things.

[EspeciallyTheLies]

Both players in the ns vs. ETL feel natural and townish. both sides are feeling so tunnely in their thought processes, which I expect from ns...whereas ETL's overdefensiveness fits the vibe I recall from 1462.

I'm going to call bullshit, since refuting blatantly false statements and showing how another player is not actively scum hunting is not the same as being "over defensive". Tunnelling also implies that I'm not willing to look at other players for reads, which is not true. I was asked to discuss notscience's case, and I have done that. The fact that you come away from that thinking that ns is town is mind-boggling.

[EspeciallyTheLies]

I'd also like to point out that while you claim you get a town read from both of us, you have chosen not to unvote.

[startfromtheheart]

lol fuck you ns. That's totally not even the point of that post AT ALL and the fact that you are attempting to twist it that way is pretty indicative.

this is what I meant by overdefensive, but I digress. if you want that rephrased, your aggression in response to the pressure on you doesn't feel off. You remind me of Jake from State Farm I think, if I were to choose someone who your playstyle reminds me of. Also, I just checked back to see who I am voting, and I'm not voting you. Have you played with ns before??

Sit Back, Relax, and Enjoy the show.

This is one of those throwaway comments that feels town for some reason.

[EspeciallyTheLies]

Please keep in mind that post 243 was in response to ns being particularly rude to me before I'd even read the thread. It is, quite literally, not game related. But I can see why you made that comment.

And yes, I play with ns far more often than seems to be natural. I don't know who is stalking who, because the odds are astronomical.

[EspeciallyTheLies]

My bad, snoopy. I mixed you up with nacho. You're bert, aintcha? <3

[Dry-fit]

Half the playerlist is lurking. Your scumbuds are in the lurkers.

Actually I'd say Mario4 is the only player who has truly unacceptable activity right now. His iso is pretty terrible too.

[notscience]

Half the playerlist is lurking. Your scumbuds are in the lurkers.

Actually I'd say Mario4 is the only player who has truly unacceptable activity right now. His iso is pretty terrible too.

Okay.

[Marcrell]

I'm minorly annoyed by your statement that the lurkers must be scum and no one else besides ETL could be it. I understand that lurking can be a tell, but there are multitudes of other reasons that people could be lurking. They don't have anything to say, they had something to say but a post changed their mind, they think over what they had to say and it doesn't make much sense... Many reasons and saying they all scum must be lurkers is putting a lot on one way to read.

[notscience]

I'm minorly annoyed by your statement that the lurkers must be scum and no one else besides ETL could be it. I understand that lurking can be a tell, but there are multitudes of other reasons that people could be lurking. They don't have anything to say, they had something to say but a post changed their mind, they think over what they had to say and it doesn't make much sense... Many reasons and saying they all scum must be lurkers is putting a lot on one way to read.

I didn't say all scum were in the lurkers. I said 2 are. Why? Because of the active people, I have at least a nulltown read on everyone but ETL and start (who is just null)

[Sakura Hana]

V/LA until Monday.

[EspeciallyTheLies]

lol... I have produced more content in 24 hours than ns has produced since the start of the game, and I'm still scum.

[notscience]

lol... I have produced more content in 24 hours than ns has produced since the start of the game, and I'm still scum.

Now you're asking for it scumfuck.

Lets look at the reasons I'm voting your slot.

1) YOUR PREDECESSOR asking for content and not providing it.

2) You coming in and immediately going after the person pushing your slot

3) You trying to misrep my entire statement and say just because you have content that you aren't scum.

[notscience]

Don't even fucking try to 1v1 me. Scum tend to die when they do.

[EspeciallyTheLies]

Don't even fucking try to 1v1 me. Scum tend to die when they do.

Please get off your high horse, bitch. Come at me.

[EspeciallyTheLies]

Or better yet, why don't you just GTFO of this game since you're having such a hard time with your life you can't seem to see through your own bullshit. I mean seriously, fucking play or GET. THE FUCK. OUT.

You're just being a prick; it has nothing to do with the slots because you're being a prick to me elsewhere. So keep at it, and I'll keep reporting the posts.

[notscience]

Don't even fucking try to 1v1 me. Scum tend to die when they do.

Please get off your high horse, bitch. Come at me.

This g ame just got interesting.

Now, lets look at what you're accusing me of doing.

1) No content. So, I'm scum for 0 content when half the playerlist is lurking and yet you call out none? Instead, you say I'm not going after other reads. What are you doing exactly? Oh, focusing on me.

2) I am pressuring you instead of lurkers- Weird, you don't seem to be doing that. Hypocrisy much?

Now, lets look at reasons why you're scum.

1) Hypocrisy. See above.

2) I called out your PREDECESSOR for asking for content then not providing it. Lets see what that served- Getting out of RVS, getting some action. Yet, you make false accusations.

3) You come in and scumread me for a "bad push" on your predecessor. Now, what's the town motivation for this?

gg no re scum.

Pedit- I am seriously playing. Now, I'm not replacing. And I'm not going into the ongoing game bit, but we can discuss it with the list mod if you'd like.

I'm not even being a prick, but I'm not letting scum waltz around my town unchallenged.

[notscience]

You have YET to see my finalform.

[notscience]

Also, in addendum.

Anyone not voting ETLScum needs to provide a reason why their person is more scummy or more deserving of a vote as of this post. It must be included in your next post.

[bubbajack8]

Let's keep it civil.

My recap:

I still don't like ETL's 252 as explained in my 253.

ETL says that NS's case on wake is poor. The reason (NS) used is okay, but was used improperly (according to ETL).

NS rewords ETL's question.

ETL accuses NS of question dodging. Asks him if his case is worthy for a vote. Also finds it interesting how agressive and rude he's being. Find's it defensive.

Notsicence is happy with his case. And says his "defensiveness" is not putting up with scumshit.

ETL says he's not scum and says NS isn't considering that or trying to find other scum.

NS says why bother consider something that isn't true, and says ETL's scumbuddies are in the lurkers.

ETL AGAIN says that NS has failed to show proof of him being scum. And says his IOS has 0 intention for finding scum.

NS asks if ETL is trying to lecture him. says that ETL already said he can't justify his predecessor. Says he's not pressuring lurkers like scum normally do. Claims he'll find scum after ETL flip.

ETL votes NS. Asks NS serious questions. Says NS's "you said you can't justify your predecessor" is bull. Quotes post where NS got it from.

Ns responds to serious questions. Reinterates scum in lurkers. Says he's had a bad 3 days.

ETL responds to NS' questions with questions. Says hes sorry NS is having a rough time. Claims he's produced more content then NS in 24 hours.

NS gives points to his vote. says Don't 1v1 me.

I'm thinking NS is scum

Spoiler:

this

So ETL, is there something I'm missing here, or is this actually what you're claiming is too little for this point in the game?

Is a dodge of this.

So, ns, is there something I'm missing here, or is this actually what you're claiming is your case on my slot?

doesn't actually answer the question until 287.

Half the playerlist is lurking. Your scumbuds are in the lurkers.

Claims scum is in lurkers.

So I am scum for not pressuring lurkers? Like scum do for easy lynches? Do tell. I already said we can find your scumfuck friends after we lynch you.

Worries about self-appearance even though he thinks scum are in lurkers.

Why did you try to cultivate other reads on the rest of the playerlist?

Because they're lurking. For assorted reasonings, some being newbies. What'll we get for pressuring them? Newbie flail.

Another reason for no pressure on lurkers. Doesn't want newbie flail. I think that NS doesn't want to pressure the lurkers because his scum buddy is a lurker. I'd also like to say I think it's a new person. As he's worried about newbie flail. It's one thing to be worried about mislynching someone, but to just worry about newbie flail is sad.

Overall: Notscience is convinced that ETL's scum is in the lurkers. But shows that he doesn't want to pressure them for fear of his self-image, and fear of "newbie flail".

P:edit; Perfect Notscience.

1) No content. So, I'm scum for 0 content when half the playerlist is lurking and yet you call out none? Instead, you say I'm not going after other reads. What are you doing exactly? Oh, focusing on me.

More about lurkers. Disgust in ETL's focus on him, even though what are his options? Let you walk all over him? And aren't You doing the same?

2) I am pressuring you instead of lurkers- Weird, you don't seem to be doing that. Hypocrisy much?

More about lurkers. when has ETL expressed that he thinks a lurker could be scum? you just said that ETL was focused on you.

PP:Edit Is this good enough reason for a vote on you Not? Even though your reasons are splotchy? And who gave YOU the authority to dictate that "Anyone not voting ETLScum needs to provide a reason why their person is more scummy or more deserving of a vote as of this post. It must be included in your next post."

So controlling.

VOTE: NotScience

[notscience]

Lmfao. I'll respond to that later. And I don't give two shits who says what authority I have, noone else is stepping up to the plate to do jack shit.

[EspeciallyTheLies]

VOTE: ETL

I don't feel like playing with an abusive player like you, ns. You've really gone beyond the game here and elsewhere. Instead of subjecting someone else to it or having the mod replace this slot yet again, I'm just going to leave.

I hope you get whatever is going on with you sorted out, but please, do not sign up for games I have signed up for and I will give you the same respect. Thank you.

[EspeciallyTheLies]

Bubba, please replace your vote on me, as this is not going to be resolved any other way. When I flip town, you can lynch ns.

[BoroPhil]

VOTE: notscience

[notscience]

lol