This is the most game-relevant thing that Robot posted this entire game, meaning we're seeing a trending of lurking, similar to last game.
I don't like that the only purpose this post serves is to shut down an early effort to get the game going.In post 69, DiamondCrash wrote:I'm not sure what GM could have said to the statement "youre scum" [sic] that isn't "hah no".CrisP wrote:Of course we are all fishing at the moment GM, still you could try to be proactive instead of defensive.
If you ask me, I think the idea of stimulating discussion can be very easily done by anyone, town or not. Moreover, why would a townsperson not be defensive while on the recieving end of the heat; and why would that be a bad thing for a townsperson to do?CrisP wrote:I liked the vote on me plus discussion, given my mistake about the game setup last time it's reasonable, but you could have elaborated more and after that you spent your time defending yourself, which is not pro town in my eyes, there's not much you can say to defend yourself at the start so you might as well show you are town by helping and ignore the random heat (if you're town).
Coincidence does not equal evidence, I'm afraid, and I'm one of those tricky people who insists on a bit more than "they're not here mostly" as a reason. Also; I don't see how that relates to that jmo16mla quote at all.CrisP wrote:In my opinion newbs lurk, especially if they are mafia. I want to point out to BW, since he didn't believe me at the time, that following that rule last game we would have found the two mafia after 40 posts day 1.
Decent point.In post 122, DiamondCrash wrote:You yourself voted people in order to garner reactions in 1442 the first. Hypocritical, much?
Decent point.In post 122, DiamondCrash wrote:...which has been rightly justified as getting a reaction from people. In addition, you have also voted for people as a method for getting a reaction in the previous game; this can only lead me to believe that you are unjustly pushing to throw suspicion at GIF, I can't see that as anything other than highly scummy. I'm not buying it for one second.
The reasoning was incorrect, but why would it be something that he would do as scum?In post 141, RachMarie wrote:Crisp why would you vote and get on DC saying he was lying about being a VT last game? So was I. At most we have 2 PRs for town and can just have one. Sometimes the mafia also has a PR sometimes both are goons. That is in the matrix set up in the OP.
What does this mean?In post 145, RachMarie wrote:GM would love more from you since you are the IC and I dont want to step on your toes here
#145 doesn't have anything else impressive, either.
Vote: RachMarie
DC's case on Buckwild was decent enough to keep me off him, although I don't agree with it and it doesn't propel him to the town category quite yet. IDR seems to have disappeared, which is a shame.
Rach, I've posted. Sort me.
