Open 538: Diffusion of Power (Game Over)

[BBmolla]

One sec DBK lemme prove a point

[BBmolla]

The only familiar names I see are Aptil and ETL.

What were you thinking when you made this post?

We're good, ETL. <3

Whoever's saying they've got a guilty on me is lying.

What were you thinking when you made this post?

I still really like my lucky vote. Plus his first and only post is lame.

Site outages be damned!

VOTE: mafiascum.net

Complete unwillingness to commit to voting anyone on the playerlist.

Lame lame lame.

His post wasn't serious.

What were you thinking when you made this post?

Yeah, I don't like this from you two. His first post wasn't serious, and was a playful poke at MS for its problems. I'd do the same. Your reason for voting him is nonexistent.having an unserious post isn't Scummy, and you know that, so what are you doing?

What were you thinking when you made this post?

That's a crap reason to vote him.

Both scum and Town can do what he did.

His act isn't inherantly Scummy.

What were you thinking when you made this post?

Your reasoning is not sound, because you're voting him because you feel an unserious post is Scummy. It's not. I do that all the time as Scum. It's over.

As for who vote for, that's up to you. However, if you want me to be alright with it, there has to be a real reason for that person being Scummy.

What were you thinking when you made this post?

*as Scum and Town.

What were you thinking when you made this post?

It's still a crap reason.

If that's the best "reason" ETL can find, then we're either screwed or eveyone needs to start engaging more.

What were you thinking when you made this post?

There are at least 80 posts here.

A better reason than fluff must exist.

What were you thinking when you made this post?

if you want me to be alright with it,

You do know I don't give a shit if you're alright with my vote or not.... right? Because I'm alright with it, and since it's my vote, that's all that's necessary.

If you truly didn't care, you wouldn't argue with me about it.

Do you normally find fluff suspicious?

What were you thinking when you made this post?

What makes you assume he's avoiding?

With all these crashes, I doubt that.

What were you thinking when you made this post?

...

I'll sort this out later.

What were you thinking when you made this post?

Give him time.

Lucky, I'm assuming you do plan to get into this game.

What were you thinking when you made this post?

*Reveals

Annihilator Beam

*

What were you thinking when you made this post?

DBK/ETL, it's not trolling. In five games right now. Working on this one at the moment. Whatever you think it is, it's not trolling. You can trust me on that.

What were you thinking when you made this post?

[BBmolla]

Do I need to continue

[BBmolla]

All I have is Wake doesn't understand the concept of too much information being anti-town.

[Mr_Blonde]

Jesus fuck this is a ton of stuff to slog through.

UNVOTE: BB

Originally I didn't buy the N0 Cop claim considering the Wiki says PRs will be designated randomly for Nights 1-5. Additionally, why add the further pressure of a guilty viewing to a player that was already gaining a few RVS votes? Anyway, he reads better from where I stopped.

Liking ETL. Where are you from btw? I posted this morning and since have been busy, but alas I am home. Technically it's still 'tonight' as I said I would be posting earlier.

On re-read Lucky stands out for the dice-roller vote thing. Aptil's response to it I didn't like much considering he was attacking Lucky for not voting someone based on the previous content when he hadn't as well. VOTE: aptil

I give-up on the re-read. I'll be more active now that I'm back with my laptop and my schedule will be considerably less busy for the time being.

[BBmolla]

I give-up on the re-read.

@Wake: Any guesses why

[Cheery Dog]

Re: end of page before this quote came from: zeke's read list - It has given my a thought of him being scum with lucky and me thrown in on that list as town as a poor bussing excuse.

Her reasoning for voting Gam has no grounding, because over five people have posted less than he has.

Pardon me for unearthing inconsistencies. Gotta keep people honest and busy here.

It is only less from ask of us with the shear number of posts and /or content?

[gamsimbre]

Gamsimbre

———✹

Would you please share your thoughts on ETL and the other players who have voted for you?

———✹

Do you still feel there is one or zero Scum between either me or BBMolla?

———✹

Between me, ETL, and DBK, in what order would you rank us from Towniest to Scummiest, and why?

--> If memory serves me right the only people that have voted for me were ETL and Bo. I found ETL's case on me valid, but like I said before my vote on lucky was to pressure him, because up until that point he didn't really post anything of value. Bo's vote I found to be more of a pressure vote, and trying to be the one starting the bandwagon.

--> Honestly, I'm not sure. Both of you are towards the middle of that line where I think you are town or scum. Let me throw the same question back to you. Between you and BBMolla, do you think there is one or zero (or two if you are so kind) scum there?

--> ETL is my strongest town read because she seems to be asking the right questions and hasn't done anything scummy. Between you and Bo I'd have to say you are the scummiest, because like I've said I don't think you're really taking an active role in this game which is scummy.

[gamsimbre]

Gah I'm tired and have been looking at this game far too long. G'night.

[EspeciallyTheLies]

Re: end of page before this quote came from: zeke's read list - It has given my a thought of him being scum with lucky and me thrown in on that list as town as a poor bussing excuse.

Her reasoning for voting Gam has no grounding, because over five people have posted less than he has.

Pardon me for unearthing inconsistencies. Gotta keep people honest and busy here.

It is only less from ask of us with the shear number of posts and /or content?

Can somebody translate?

[Cheery Dog]

I am very happy with my vote.

Damn. I was hoping to keep a Gam wagon going to see how certain people would react, but that's not happening.

UNVOTE:

I'll read up on things later and probably set another vote some time soon.

You keep mentioning getting people to react towards this gam wagon, which people were you expecting?

[Does Bo Know]

Yeah I'm giving up on it.

Mainly BBmolla and Zebe. I'll explain when I get home (like 10 minutes)

[Does Bo Know]

What do you like about gam?

His love of mafia

But I don't know if that's alignment relevent. I'm still deciding if his bad hop on is scummy.

@Lucky and ETL:
To clarify:
Null is 'no useful or very useless activity'
Nothing is 'no activity to even start with'
And the uncategorized category is 'a slight idea, but nothing major'

I'm sorry if this confuzzles you, but that just happens sometimes. I'm not sure if it's me giving more mainstream names to my obscure categories, translation mistakes or something completely different.

@DBK: I don't feel this is 100% out of RVS yet. Half of the players are under 10 posts and something. I consider RVS more than just "random" stage of the game (None of the votes are

never truly

random). My "RVS" is can be described as the time to get the game rolling properly. Like in the scum/null/nothing/wth case above, lines I draw are never straight.

Kalimar & gam, who's scummier? With only 1 post from K, I have to choose gam. That contradiction with 114 and 115.

I was trying to keep the wagon on Gam to see how BBmolla and Zebe would get on it. I didn't expect to get anything huge out of BBmolla since he seems to be very experienced, but he might've jumped on the wagon. I did wanna see what Zebe would do once Kalimar posted since supposedly, Zebe decided to put a first-vote on Kalimar as opposed to a wagon vote on someone even scummier.

Oh and thinking it over again, I pretty much know ETL is town now. I'm thinking if ETL were scum he wouldn't have called me out so suddenly on the buddying issue or whatever and instead just let me townread her no questions asked.

[Wake1]

*That awkward moment where you have one side whining about too much information being generated, and the other side bitching about not doing enough to gather and use information. It'd be great if they'd just take each other out so I don't have to hear any more belly-aching.

[Does Bo Know]

Which side am I again? I feel like I'm on both sides. You're saying a lot of crap that basically says you're trying to get information, when in reality all the crap you are saying seems to lead to no information.

What are your conclusions Wake? I want conclusions from you about anything this game, because then I'll have a much better chance of properly reading you

[BBmolla]

Wake why are you avoiding my questions?

[Does Bo Know]

BB are you still reading Wake as town that you'd rather not have around? Or scum?

[Wake1]

I think the problem is I'm in too many games at once.

[Does Bo Know]

I think the problem is I'm in too many games at once.

Then replace out. You better not start using that as an excuse for lackluster play.

[Wake1]

My play is not lackluster. I just need more time. I'll get around to it when I can, or I'll just take a short vacation.

[BBmolla]

BB are you still reading Wake as town that you'd rather not have around? Or scum?

Former

[BBmolla]

Props for trying Wake, I just think you need to find the right questions to ask instead of trying the shotgun effect of asking every question.

[Does Bo Know]

My play is not lackluster.

I just need more time. I'll get around to it when I can, or I'll just take a short vacation.

God forbid someone thinks badly of you

But I meant throwing the "I'm not playing as well as I should because something else is happening" card is crap, because you should probably just replace out. Otherwise it looks like a convenient excuse.

ETL knows, we kinda talked about this in the lover game: not to let outside stuff alter the quality of your play when replacing out is a thing.

[Wake1]

If I wasn't spread so thin, it'd be different. I don't JUST ask questions. I then ANALYZE and USE every ounce of information gathered from the responses to form reads and conclusions. Time allows me to ask the questions, but I'm struggling to get around to the breaking down and digesting of all of the information. In one or two games tops it's a breeze, and turns my ISO into atreasure trove. My mistake was having the itch to try some additional neat games that grabbed my attention.

[Does Bo Know]

^^That. That shit right there.

That's basically claiming your play's worse because you're in more games.

Which is exactly what I said I hated.

You're also admitting it would be a breeze if you were in less games. Meaning you'd be playing better over a set interval of time.

I think if more games is halting your ability to overperform, then you should replace out or tough it up and never expect to gain any sympathy for being in more games than you could handle.