Mini 1537: ATTACK ON TITAN (Game Over!)

pieguyn · Post Post #1550 (ISO) » Tue Jan 21, 2014 11:35 am

that's not weak. sounds to me like you just took the weak modifier and added it to a non-weak role

how did that quote go again? "paraphrasing your role PM takes seconds, fixing your fakeclaim's mistakes takes an eternity"?

Kazekirimaru · Post Post #1551 (ISO) » Tue Jan 21, 2014 11:36 am

You're

weak too, NatiMuffin?

Kazekirimaru · Post Post #1552 (ISO) » Tue Jan 21, 2014 11:36 am

You're

weak too, NatiMuffin?

Kazekirimaru · Post Post #1553 (ISO) » Tue Jan 21, 2014 11:36 am

You're

weak too, NatiMuffin?

pieguyn · Post Post #1554 (ISO) » Tue Jan 21, 2014 11:37 am

@mastin: here

In post 1301, pieguyn wrote:well that's interesting. fakegod quite obviously had that planned out. the way FG did it it was 100% fakeable and there was nothing whatsoever that would stop him from doing it as scum. not to mention I don't really know how much fakegod's plan would even help and it certainly wouldn't break the entire setup. this felt different in that it lookde like she was legitimately trying to figure out shit. the way she want about it felt town and seemed like it came from an angle of having an idea and trying to get the most info possible while withholding info from scum

I'm really bad at explaining this. does anyone else see what I'm seeing here?

I can't really link exact things bc it's more of the way she went about it, but I can try if you really want

Rancid Broderick Drake · Post Post #1555 (ISO) » Tue Jan 21, 2014 11:38 am

In post 1553, Kazekirimaru wrote:
You're
weak too, NatiMuffin?

Aye.

Bert · Post Post #1556 (ISO) » Tue Jan 21, 2014 11:40 am

In post 1555, Rancid Broderick Drake wrote:
In post 1553, Kazekirimaru wrote:
You're
weak too, NatiMuffin?
Aye.

Yarrr! Hi-ho thar fellows how be ye?

Rancid Broderick Drake · Post Post #1557 (ISO) » Tue Jan 21, 2014 11:43 am

The waves be clear for sailing today!

Kazekirimaru · Post Post #1558 (ISO) » Tue Jan 21, 2014 11:46 am

In post 1549, Rancid Broderick Drake wrote:Arr that not be how me role pm have weak phrased at all!

Anyway, what's wrong with it? Is it just phrased bad or did he get the mechanic wrong?

Mafia Theory · Post Post #1559 (ISO) » Tue Jan 21, 2014 11:50 am

In post 1549, Rancid Broderick Drake wrote:Arr that not be how me role pm have weak phrased at all!

Check again. It's a passive ability. Not active. Named Cowardice. Preventing the use of the 3D gear.

Kazekirimaru · Post Post #1560 (ISO) » Tue Jan 21, 2014 11:52 am

In post 1548, mastin2 wrote:a passive sometimes preventing the activation of my 3-D gear.

In post 1559, Mafia Theory wrote:Preventing the use of the 3D gear.

Hm.

pieguyn · Post Post #1561 (ISO) » Tue Jan 21, 2014 11:53 am

weak means you don't even have maneuver gear to begin with

you just took the weak modifier and threw it on top of your non-weak role bc you realized claiming weak wouldn't work and you couldn't redact it to a normal human

Rancid Broderick Drake · Post Post #1562 (ISO) » Tue Jan 21, 2014 12:00 pm

In post 1559, Mafia Theory wrote:Check again. It's a passive ability. Not active. Named Cowardice. Preventing the use of the 3D gear.

It's not named Cowardice here, for one, I'm not outing the name of ours because I'm kinda paranoid about a Death Note at the moment(esp after Plum's flip).

Rancid Broderick Drake · Post Post #1563 (ISO) » Tue Jan 21, 2014 12:01 pm

btw you seem conveniently 'around' for someone who's, well, supposed to be really busy.

Mafia Theory · Post Post #1564 (ISO) » Tue Jan 21, 2014 12:01 pm

Look.
THE DAMN FLAVOR SAYS I HAVE A 3-D GEAR, BUT CAN'T USE IT.
Read the damn flavor.

Against titans, trepidation unable to use it. No abilities. It's a passive. I can't get any more clear than that.

pieguyn · Post Post #1565 (ISO) » Tue Jan 21, 2014 12:02 pm

then you're not weak

Rancid Broderick Drake · Post Post #1566 (ISO) » Tue Jan 21, 2014 12:03 pm

I'm not even worried about that.

PEDIT: Pie, stop it. This line of reasoning has come to an end and nothing more good can come of it. Wait for Kagami.

And a readslist from you mastin would be appreciated.

mastin2 · Post Post #1567 (ISO) » Tue Jan 21, 2014 12:09 pm

In post 1563, Rancid Broderick Drake wrote:btw you seem conveniently 'around' for someone who's, well, supposed to be really busy.

I'm here when I really shouldn't be. Basically, I AM busy, but am cramming in time here that I shouldn't be cramming in. (It's the same type of thing which caused me to be overwhelmed during the weekend. This stuff does have consequences.)

In post 1566, Rancid Broderick Drake wrote:And a readslist from you mastin would be appreciated.

Kaze's scum, Bert's scum, and Brian Skies is probably scum. I said all of this before. I'm also not strongly townreading Kagami, and will need to check out pie's view on it.

Kagami · Post Post #1568 (ISO) » Tue Jan 21, 2014 12:14 pm

My weak is not that I don't "have" maneuver gear, simply that I can't use it as a night action. i.e. don't have the maneuver gear ability

My flavor "ability" is Penance: I am so super sad because of my first mission that I can't evade actions at night

Bert · Post Post #1569 (ISO) » Tue Jan 21, 2014 12:15 pm

Got caught up in a phone call. Anyone here ever watched Hot in Cleveland or Happily Divorced? I haven't...I'm gonna be watching that tonight apparently!

Also,

Vote: Bert

Be back later.

Kazekirimaru · Post Post #1570 (ISO) » Tue Jan 21, 2014 12:18 pm

Okay. So the flavour ability can vary depending on the character.

But the means, I dunno.

Kagami · Post Post #1571 (ISO) » Tue Jan 21, 2014 12:21 pm

Just kill bert, he's claimed scum.

Kagami · Post Post #1572 (ISO) » Tue Jan 21, 2014 12:22 pm

The only person who's "weak"ness doesn't fit is bert's, since he doesn't have a flavor ability about why he can't evade actions. Mastin's is plausible

Kazekirimaru · Post Post #1573 (ISO) » Tue Jan 21, 2014 12:23 pm

Yep. Set course for lynchville.

BROseidon · Post Post #1574 (ISO) » Tue Jan 21, 2014 12:23 pm

We should finish mass claim first before lynching him. Mastin needs to popcorn.