With 6 alive it takes 4 to lynch.
[L-4] Lucky2u
[L-4] Thor665
[L-4] BBmolla
[L-4] Smudger
[L-4] EspeciallyTheLies
Not voting (3): BBmolla, Zekrom25, Thor665
[L-2]: Zekrom25
Y'see, my thought process is usually that town would try to keep coming up with new ways to show what they're thinking and scum would easily slide into simple repetition since it's easy.In post 1468, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:@thor: About smudger, it's a combination of his attitude and comments the last few days (most notably - "I know I'm town - It's absolutely lucky/zek!" - He keeps repeating this because, I think, he's tried to explain his reasoning otherwise and was not being heard/understood). What does a townie do at that point? They just keep repeating what they know. What does a scum do? They make up new theories because they can. Then, add in zek's responses, or lack thereof, and Lucky's reactions to both, and I'm leaning much more towards townSmudger than not. And the more I look back at the game, the more I like it.
I do though, usually see town react with more passion.
I do see that as a possibility, and it might have simply been scum portraying a town player in a poor light.In post 1479, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Do you see lucky+smudger as a possibility? And if so, how do you explain lucky's Smurfy explanation for why zek voted smudger at his entrance?
Yup town players are talking and this town player is tapping his foot waiting for you to lynch the scum.In post 1478, Thor665 wrote:Yeah, the town players are still talking - what's your problem with that?
I like this question.In post 1486, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Lucky, if zek is scum, who is the partner
Smudger. I thought I had said smudger/zek was my scum pair pick. I'm voting zek because that is clearly who is getting lynched today. Not because I stopped believing smudger to be scum.In post 1486, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:UNVOTE:
Not ending the day yet. I'm going to the store.
Lucky, if zek is scum, who is the partner
The town energy overflows.In post 1488, Smudger wrote:I have to come in here and say what more do you want me to do Thor, ETL, BB. There is absolutely nothing more I can say. I don't plead I just try to stick to the facts and let those who need to decide, decide. My only proof is what I know and what I have been saying since the later states of yesterday. Even if you line up mine and Lucky's ISO I agree there are good and bad things in equal measure from us both. You have to decide I fully realise that is an AtE but it's really all I have left.
I'm back from the store, Lucky. Can I see your case on smudger please?In post 1491, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:K. Why smudger?
Yours too, thor.In post 1483, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Is there more to your suspicion of smudger than his attitude? I mean, anything concrete as far as his voting patterns or the pushes he's made?