What ya mean? Kinda vague.In post 54, aphix wrote:Yukari doesn't follow directions well.
He started fishing for answers to his question.In post 47, Yukari wrote:What did bullish do that was, "very scummy"?In post 43, Flubbernugget wrote:Pushing a bandwagon lynch before we can get good reads? It's definitely weak reasoning, but it's what I have right now, although after the fact Bullish began to act very scummy.
Already answered that. But to add my gut feeling to the situation, there is probably one scum voting for Bullish right now, if he's town, and there's one more vote for him, that's the perfect opportunity for the other scum to step in and gain a free kill, which definitely isn't good for us.In post 48, aphix wrote:Flubbernugget: Below question, interested in your answer.In post 26, Yukari wrote:Ppl can vote how they wantz..
Also, being good at math doesn't seem very scummy.
In post 42, singersigner wrote:What's so bad about an L-2 vote this early?
If we were bulls scumbuddy we would be likely to jump on the bandwagon for him being an rvs bandwagon and possibly less likely to end in a lynch. For early distancing. Honestly if scumbuddy did very poorly at defending himself we would meybey even let him die for the extra distancing depending on the situation.In post 57, Flubbernugget wrote:Already answered that. But to add my gut feeling to the situation, there is probably one scum voting for Bullish right now, if he's town, and there's one more vote for him, that's the perfect opportunity for the other scum to step in and gain a free kill, which definitely isn't good for us.In post 48, aphix wrote:Flubbernugget: Below question, interested in your answer.In post 26, Yukari wrote:Ppl can vote how they wantz..
Also, being good at math doesn't seem very scummy.
In post 42, singersigner wrote:What's so bad about an L-2 vote this early?
Mind actually contributing, besides suggesting it might be a good reason to lynch the people looking most Town, and trying to tell us what you would do if you were Scum?In post 62, Yukari wrote:Not scum, just saiyan.
"I'm not going to scumhunt or give reasons for my vote but I'm planning on parking my vote here all day and continue not playing. K thanks bai."In post 61, mathbandit wrote:Yup. Definitely happy with my vote. Don't see it being moved much today, at this point.
Care to share with the class or continue the l-2 wagon on page three with naked vote sheeping a non tell?
In post 55, Yukari wrote:What ya mean? Kinda vague.In post 54, aphix wrote:Yukari doesn't follow directions well.
aphix wrote:Yukari: Also, without any quoting or posting links, curious as to what is your current opinion on RVS?
I wouldn't call what he did 'pushing' nor was it really a 'bandwagon.' Why did you interpret it that way?In post 43, Flubbernugget wrote:Pushing a bandwagon lynch before we can get good reads? It's definitely weak reasoning, but it's what I have right now, although after the fact Bullish began to act very scummy.
What exactly do you think is lacking from their play?mathbandit wrote:Mind actually contributing, besides suggesting it might be a good reason to lynch the people looking most Town, and trying to tell us what you would do if you were Scum?In post 62, Yukari wrote:Not scum, just saiyan.
Might help you see the reasons for my votes if you tried reading my posts.In post 66, aphix wrote:"I'm not going to scumhunt or give reasons for my vote but I'm planning on parking my vote here all day and continue not playing. K thanks bai."In post 61, mathbandit wrote:Yup. Definitely happy with my vote. Don't see it being moved much today, at this point.
Everything they post makes no sense from someone with as much experience as they have. And I don'y buy it as being sincere.In post 67, singersigner wrote:What exactly do you think is lacking from their play?mathbandit wrote:Mind actually contributing, besides suggesting it might be a good reason to lynch the people looking most Town, and trying to tell us what you would do if you were Scum?In post 62, Yukari wrote:Not scum, just saiyan.
That early in the game, those were the only straws to grasp at. Now I am more suspicious of Bullish for the reasons I have already stated. I have also noticed Yukari is attracting a lot of attention. I'm going to read into his posts a little more shortly.In post 67, singersigner wrote:I wouldn't call what he did 'pushing' nor was it really a 'bandwagon.' Why did you interpret it that way?In post 43, Flubbernugget wrote:Pushing a bandwagon lynch before we can get good reads? It's definitely weak reasoning, but it's what I have right now, although after the fact Bullish began to act very scummy.
Here. My games under my name and my hydra on site. Like two irl games.
Just think that someone could be possibly be tryin a bit too hard to blend in. In the least be suspicious of everyone, and dont let overly town facade prevent analysis.@Yukari...when you say that it might even be worth targeting the people who look the most town because scum have incentive to look more town, how would you distinguish that from a true town? Or... could you elaborate more on that point?
1 game of forum mafia a few months ago is not much. We played another 1 or 2 games before but that was years ago. So like 3 total.In post 69, mathbandit wrote:Everything they post makes no sense from someone with as much experience as they have. And I don'y buy it as being sincere.In post 67, singersigner wrote:What exactly do you think is lacking from their play?mathbandit wrote:Mind actually contributing, besides suggesting it might be a good reason to lynch the people looking most Town, and trying to tell us what you would do if you were Scum?In post 62, Yukari wrote:Not scum, just saiyan.
Are you talking about this?mathbandit wrote:Might help you see the reasons for my votes if you tried reading my posts.
If so, you are basing bad judgment and decision to being a scum tell. Reading Yukari posts here and in the one completed game I don't see the level of thought going into these posts that you seem to see. I see, and they explain it, exactly as I read it in the first place as someone trying tomathbandit wrote:Unvote, Vote: Yukari
I don't buy for a second that someone with a full game of MS forum Mafia plus multiple games of chat Mafia would be honestly making the suggestion of voting off the people that look most Town.
Here's my suggestion, that probably isn't going to happen. One, a hammer on flash wagon like that turns up on town, is probably going to be getting lynched the next day. Here's a hint, as town don't hammer on a flash wagon this early in day one. You are most likely only going to help scum by lynching a town player.In post 57, Flubbernugget wrote:
Already answered that. But to add my gut feeling to the situation, there is probably one scum voting for Bullish right now, if he's town, and there's one more vote for him, that's the perfect opportunity for the other scum to step in and gain a free kill, which definitely isn't good for us.
I don't tend to provide personal insight until I have all the facts to provide it.In post 70, Flubbernugget wrote:I have also noticed, singersigner, that you have been asking a lot of questions (rightfully so as the IC), but are hesitant to provide much personal insight into the situation at hand? Any reason behind doing so?