↑ TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:Honestly I disagree with Shos reasoning if he voted for TT based on TT push on Molly. This is bad reasoning but I do not nessarilly see this coming from a scum POV.From my view it seems like everything is coming from a frustrated town POV. If you can show me where I am wrong than I will be wiling to listen.
Alright, you disagree with shos' initial reason for voting me. Let's look at everything else:
shos accused me of only attacking those who scumread me. I posted an overview of all the players I had pressured during the game, and only 1 of those times actually fit that allegation(shos). Shos ignored this.
shos started the game with completely naked reads, and even after I challenged him to explain them. Shos ignored this.
shos accused me of only pressuring mollie, and trying to pass that off as scumhunting. I corrected him on that as well, I was very active with other players during the same time. Shos ignored this.
Shos asked me about my other reads. I gave them. Shos ignored this, and later pressured me again as not having any other reads.
Shos repeatedly says I have been scumreading mollie. I never scumread mollie. I corrected him multiple times. Shos ignored this.
Shos accused me of misrepping him(didn't bother to say how or when), but I've been quoting him. I pointed that out, shos ignored this.
Shos accused me of trying to policy lynch mollie, because I said I would rather she contribute or replace than having to resort to a policy lynch.
Do you think there is real town motivation behind consistently making shit up, ignoring when it's been corrected, and making new shit up? Sincere townhunting doesn't work like that. If I accused you of only having OMGUS scumreads, and you replied showing me how only 1 of your scumreads had been scumreading you, I would acknowledge that. I would say something like 'Oh, my bad'. I wouldn't just ignore it and attack you from a new angle.