Corpse Party Mafia [WRONG END]

[pieguyn]

aaaaaa;slkdjf;d

votecount 2.7

Shadowcat (1) - White Narcissus

Not voting (11) - Ankamius, notscience, Zymf, Skold, ZZZX, SXTLHGaiden, Mikazuki, Shadowcat, Witness Protection, Thor and Loki, ZeL1nK2

With 12 alive, it takes 7 to lynch. Deadline is April 14, 00:30 GMT-7 or in (expired on 2015-04-14 00:00:30).

Malakittens head of Shadowcat is V/LA until 4/8.

[pieguyn]

Zymf has failed to pick up his prod and, as such, I am searching for a replacement. He may remain in the game if he returns before a replacement is found.

[Mikazuki]

There are too many things that can go wrong if we try to 'confirm' Shadow's ability claim since we don't really know how the scum darkness stuff works, I don't think we can get reliable results.

[White Narcissus]

Part of me wonders why pieguy even gave Mayu that fake-claim in the first place when it was possibly going to be outright counter-claimed if Shadowcat is town. That seems like poor modding.

This. pieguy didn't give scum a fakeclaim so close to an actual role in a game. Of course he didn't give scum two similar fakeclaims either, so what's the answer? Shadowcat are faking theirs, not following their given one, for whatever reason.

~Wis

[White Narcissus]

What do you currently think of Skold?

And what do you think of the idea of lynching Skold today?

I don't care for random lurker lynches. Skold needs to get replaced, not lynched.

~Wis

[ZeL1nK2]

its not gaurennteed it will work because I dont know how much scum # of darkness they can raise

I find this statement a little awkward.

I think if I had their role, I'd be assuming I'm some sort of weakened form of doctor (with the ability to protect from darkness kills but not decrease their darkness completely).

Unless they're making the assumption scum can raise darkness over 140% or this was a brain fart, I don't really understand this post.

[ZeL1nK2]

I don't care for random lurker lynches. Skold needs to get replaced, not lynched.

I didn't really like his recent posts. None of the thoughts in them made any sense to me. I can't even really parse what he's trying to say a lot of the time.

For example, I

think

he called me town then FoSed me then called me town again? And I think he called you scummy for not flavour-claiming then decided you were a town lean?

It's a mess of a post.

[ZeL1nK2]

And that's ignoring the part about it not making any sense whatsoever because technically notscience has flavour-claimed (at least partially). And when I pointed this out he didn't even acknowledge it. I don't really know what he's doing and I can't make sense of what his posts are saying.

[Mikazuki]

its not gaurennteed it will work because I dont know how much scum # of darkness they can raise

I find this statement a little awkward.

I think if I had their role, I'd be assuming I'm some sort of weakened form of doctor (with the ability to protect from darkness kills but not decrease their darkness completely).

Unless they're making the assumption scum can raise darkness over 140% or this was a brain fart, I don't really understand this post.

I don't see a problem with the statement, OP says that scum can raise darkness of one or more people, we don't know exactly how much scum can raise darkness for one person (other than that at least with Sachiko alive they can raise to at least 100% overnight) or how it would work if they can raise more than one person. Therefore there's no way to accurately test out whether or not Shadow's ability claim is true. Does that make kinda make sense? My explaining sucks.

[Mikazuki]

Pretty much agree with you guys on Skold though, like I said before, don't like his catchup post all that much, hope he can post more before deadline.

[ZeL1nK2]

I could see scum being able to raise darkness to 100% in a single night (obviously). I just don't really see why pieguy would put a role like that in the game AND allow scum to raise darkness to over 140% (not 100%, 140%).

The statement is awkward because it assumes their role is a red herring, essentially.

[Mikazuki]

I could see scum being able to raise darkness to 100% in a single night (obviously). I just don't really see why pieguy would put a role like that in the game AND allow scum to raise darkness to over 140% (not 100%, 140%).

The statement is awkward because it assumes their role is a red herring, essentially.

Why would scum need to raise darkness to over 140%?
The point is that we don't know how much scum can raise darkness by or if they can divide it between more than one person. So, even if the person that Shadow targets doesn't die, there's no way of confirming if their ability actually worked, or if scum just didn't raise their darkness to over 100%. The problem is that we have no idea how much control the scum faction has over the darkness that gets distributed.

[Mikazuki]

Wait a sec, I seem to remember someone saying that scum can't die from darkness, where in the rules does it say that? All I see is:

Everyone in the game has a Darkness level. This starts at 0% and can range from 0% to 100%.
Certain game events can increase the Darkness level. If anyone reaches 100% darkness, they die.

[Mikazuki]

We need scum lynches to win, we can't count on killing scum via darkness

Ah here it is. Uh, yeah, where did you get this from? Did I miss something?

[Mikazuki]

I assume that what you mean is that scum are unlikely to gather enough darkness to die during the normal course of the game?

[White Narcissus]

Don't see how not making sense is scummy or lynchworthy

~Wis

[Mikazuki]

It's not, but it's something to keep in mind. Although tbh in my experience so far, town have been more likely to make somewhat nonsensical arguments than scum.

[White Narcissus]

Although I don't understand what doesn't make sense to you. His argument was that notscience didn't flavor claim when he wanted to mass flavor claim. It's a rather weak argument and means completely nothing, as like was explained the more scummy people are expected to claim first, but it does make sense.

~Wis

pedit: I was talking to zelink

[White Narcissus]

And I think he called you scummy for not flavour-claiming then decided you were a town lean?

No, he called ns scummy, not us. He gave a town lean on us.

~Wis

[ZeL1nK2]

Oh right, I misread that part.

[ZeL1nK2]

Don't see how not making sense is scummy or lynchworthy

Perhaps I described it badly. It's not

just

that his posts don't make sense (although they don't, and even if I misread the part about you, I don't think I'm misreading the part about me). It's that I'm having a hard time seeing genuine scum hunting in those thoughts.

What do you make of those posts?

[White Narcissus]

It seems genuine enough to me. First he likes you and says so, then he sees something from you he doesn't like and says so.

~Wis

[ZeL1nK2]

Ah, I didn't mean that particular part. Just the post in general as a catchup post and I guess the overall flow/direction of it. Unless you meant the post felt genuine as a whole?

Also, it bugs me a bit when someone says stuff like "this is my worst town game in a while" or something along those lines.

[ZeL1nK2]

The fact that Loki and Broki are lurking through this entire day phase is not cool. Not cool, Loki. Not cool.

[pieguyn]

ima kono basho de
kotaete hoshii