↑ RIP wrote:Might not*
U are too sure Huh?
Indeed, and attacking read certainty ("U are too sure") instead of read validity is a response I'd expect from scum more often than town.
There's a lot of surface-level thinking going on in your posts when there's evidence for more potential than that. You obviously have forum mafia experience, as shown by
Post 35 where you're apparently familiar with the customs and general meta style of other sites, (nota bene: site
s
, plural). So you're not a complete newbie at this. Yet we still see stuff like:
Post 34: The knee jerk reaction vote by itself is null, but it doesn't hold up to more than approximately five seconds of reflection. Rainbowdash had already explained why she thought a mass claim
might
be a good idea with the possible breakability of the set-up. From a town perspective, the vote only makes sense in a rigid, dogmatic, "burn the witch" kind of way which isn't supported by the accompanying reasoning ("We are not mass claiming, how it's that helpful?")
nor
the fact you're willing to let go of the matter very easily.
The entire initial Jingle push is surface level. You demonstrated a basic understanding of the early Jingle "scumslip" in
Post 37 but failed to note and follow through on key details such as the part about Antihero being the one to mention the Dark Coalition first. You're also not thinking about the win condition dimension which was being hammered on pretty hard at the time.
Post 68: The "pressure vote" that leads to a dead end. mainz has done all of jack squat since you voted her and yet you happily skip along off that vote without engaging her in any meaningful way; this goes against the point of a pressure vote. Being "opportunistic" also doesn't really mesh with the scumread on Jingle.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: RIP
