↑ True Ogre wrote:@Cerb
This happened while you were away, Mr This Game's At The Top Of My Priority List.
Refresh me on why you're townreading Seniors please. Do you know how to read them better than Marquis or Poper?
↑ True Ogre wrote: ↑ Cerberus v666 wrote:I find it doubtful that on this occasion I'll be more likely to talk you down than seniors,but normally I'd say yes to this question. If this is town tunneling one another, it means today, like every other day, is going to be all about the FS slot. We've generated a ridiculous amount of noise about them, which makes it especially difficult to figure out other slots (without seeing their flip), while simultaneously making it effortless for those who want to coast to simply do so.
Well you're calling it noise and I'm calling it faith in the slot.
I don't really see Piper getting away with a "soft-claiming to form a big wagon and push through a mislynch based on momentum and then retracting the soft-claim but still pushing the wagon through somehow because it's already big based on the soft-claim they retracted" (or whatever it is, as Dwlee and Seniors seem to be bafflingly explaining). One of the heads posted that we were going to hear about the "Old School" thing in a few days (although I don't think that eventuated) -- but do you really think that kind of push is going to go through and become a mislynch on a wing and a prayer and there aren't consequences for them tomorrow (or even today), just a glib explanation? I don't think they had reason to take that risk after Skybird flipped scum. Nor do I think it would *work*.
Which is why I'm finding it really strange that this focus on soft-claiming or claiming unspecified, being scummy, is credible to anyone.
However it is to {Seniors, Dwlee, dramonic} (the latter presumably)
And you {Cerberus} think Seniors are almost certainly town and you're citing this exchange:
(Seriously - this is the entire evolution for you)
↑ Cerberus v666 wrote:nope, I'm not pushing your wagon. I'd prefer that we lynch mirhawk. ^^ I will admit to some bias in knowing that if you end up not getting lynched, we're just going to default to ranger, and I'm 95% certain Ranger is town, whereas I'm absolutely uncertain about you.
↑ Cerberus v666 wrote: ↑ Friendless Seniors wrote:like, imagine if we had claimed cop.
and cerb was giving you guys this answer.
you'd lynch him in a minute.
pedit: you're scum cerb. Give it a break. You're doing a really shitty version of a distance from our wagon
If you had claimed cop I would tell the town it's really stupid to lynch a claimed cop on D1, and we should lynch you in Lylo if you were still alive then.
↑ Cerberus v666 wrote:(btw, you all realize this interaction FS is having with me is SUPER FUCKING TOWN RIGHT? I'm not being sarcastic. I don't know why scum him would do this, because there's literally no chance of a wagon being shifted over to me, of all people, at this stage in the day)
--snipped--
Now I realise this is mainly your end of the conversation but these posts are sequential in your ISO and in the first post you're claiming that you're absolutely uncertain about Seniors, then two posts later you're saying they're Super Fucking Town.
That doesn't make sense at all. You don't pick one single point in time or one single exchange to go from uncertain to Super-town and then spend the rest of the game coasting on that read.
And I don't believe that non-survivalism is alignment indicative to your mind when you told Skybird this:
↑ Cerberus v666 wrote:Survivalist is NAI, Skybird, unless the person you're pushing as an alternative is someone who you had previously considered town.
So you somehow think that Seniors is town because they decided *not* to take the survivalist route, and instead tried to drum up a bull wagon on you which had no chance of eventuating?
Why is that town if survivalism isn't alignment indicative to you?
I think it's a perfectly possible tactic from scum. Especially if there's a good chance they'll be lynched and the attack is on their buddy. Quite the wifommy legacy to leave.
Yeah, it was at the top of my priority list for mafia, but international tabletop day was yesterday and I spent 24 hours playing board games, plus an additional 14 hours or something sleeping+playing old dead ccg's with a friend. Top of my priority list isn't what it used to be.
Anyways, the issue wasn't that it wasn't a survivalistic move. It was the fact that it had no chance of actually accomplishing anything. There was no point to it for scum. Do you see a reason why scum!FS makes posts along those lines? I really don't, it doesn't seem to accomplish anything at all. Actually, never mind. If FS and I were scum together, then yes, that set of posts DOES have scum motivation. It essentially makes it so I can point to that post/set of posts when he flips, and use it as a defense. So okay, if you're positing a FS/Cerb team(which isn't unrealistic, given the interactions between us), I can understand seeing scum motivation there. If you're not positing such a team, then it makes no fucking sense as scum. And though I hate to be one to state the obvious/something I would have to say as scum, I know I'm town, therefore I see no scum motivation.
I have no idea if I know how to read them better than Marquis or Piper. I've only ever seen hiplop as scum at any length, and I've only ever seen EP as town, and generally I don't read people by "knowing them" so much as by tracing their play for inconsistencies and flaws or contradictions in their narratives, and by clearing people as town due to actions or lines they may take for which I can find no scum motivation. So yeah. Town clears due to things like the exchange I had with FS, which I found to have no scum motivation, and scum catches due to shifting narratives and inconsistencies in, well, anything.
What all that means, though, is that I'm REALLY bad at finding anything if I haven't actually been paying attention to the game.