A Musical Mafia! (Game over)

ISO · Post Post #6575 (ISO) » Mon Jun 06, 2016 9:16 am

Why would a town Jailkeeper jail TO night 1 and 2?

pistachi0n · Post Post #6576 (ISO) » Mon Jun 06, 2016 9:38 am

In post 6573, Cerberus v666 wrote:
In post 6572, pistachi0n wrote:With TPP's analysis, dram and podo are still the best votes for today (by POE.)

If there really is a vig who doesn't want to claim, why is a vig shot bad? Best case scenario, scum gets shot, worst case, it helps with POE.
Is my analysis flawed pistachion, with regards to the likely existence of a town aligned jailkeeper as the explanation for shotty's repeated power failures?

I think it's more likely to be a scum jailkeeper--everyone is desperate for information, so why no claim?

Cerberus v666 · Post Post #6577 (ISO) » Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:07 am

In post 6575, SirCakez wrote:Why would a town Jailkeeper jail TO night 1 and 2?

Because he was obvtown as fuck and a likely nk target?

pistachi0n · Post Post #6578 (ISO) » Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:09 am

In post 6577, Cerberus v666 wrote:
In post 6575, SirCakez wrote:Why would a town Jailkeeper jail TO night 1 and 2?
Because he was obvtown as fuck and a likely nk target?

I'm still more concerned about the lack of a claim--it means they have something to hide at this point.

ISO · Post Post #6579 (ISO) » Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:11 am

Ok on night 1 that makes sense but after claiming an Investigative?

Cerberus v666 · Post Post #6580 (ISO) » Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:37 am

A shitty investigative? Yes, you jail keep that still. Pistachion thought conftown waa a ghost, no reason to protect her at that stage.

Flubbernugget · Post Post #6581 (ISO) » Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:39 am

Resetting my timer

pistachi0n · Post Post #6582 (ISO) » Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:53 am

In post 6580, Cerberus v666 wrote:Pistachion thought conftown waa a ghost

?

ISO · Post Post #6583 (ISO) » Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:54 am

In post 6580, Cerberus v666 wrote:A shitty investigative? Yes, you jail keep that still. Pistachion thought conftown waa a ghost, no reason to protect her at that stage.

Not if you want to test any of those flavor claims or actually get them confirmed <.<

pistachi0n · Post Post #6584 (ISO) » Mon Jun 06, 2016 11:26 am

Anyway, TO being widely townread could go either way--you can argue that he got JK'd because a town JK thought he'd be targeted, or you can argue that he got JK'd because scum thought he was a town PR. I think scum JK is more likely.

dramonic · Post Post #6585 (ISO) » Mon Jun 06, 2016 11:29 am

In post 6572, pistachi0n wrote:If there really is a vig who doesn't want to claim, why is a vig shot bad? Best case scenario, scum gets shot, worst case, it helps with POE.

If the vig is refusing to claim its because they think they're worth more than confirmed town.
Hint: They're not.

All that WIFOM is ridiculous. Shameful from Cerb, I expect much better than that.

pistachi0n · Post Post #6586 (ISO) » Mon Jun 06, 2016 11:57 am

I agree the vig should claim, and I wonder if scum is trying to stall again.

podoboq · Post Post #6587 (ISO) » Mon Jun 06, 2016 12:22 pm

In post 6586, pistachi0n wrote:I agree the vig should claim, and I wonder if scum is trying to stall again.

In post 6581, Flubbernugget wrote:Resetting my timer

Just sayin

pistachi0n · Post Post #6588 (ISO) » Mon Jun 06, 2016 12:43 pm

In post 6587, podoboq wrote:
In post 6586, pistachi0n wrote:I agree the vig should claim, and I wonder if scum is trying to stall again.

In post 6581, Flubbernugget wrote:Resetting my timer
Just sayin

Yes, also Cerberus "I don't care about this game lol" v666.

ISO · Post Post #6589 (ISO) » Mon Jun 06, 2016 12:44 pm

Flubber is a great lynch target still.

Cerberus v666 · Post Post #6590 (ISO) » Mon Jun 06, 2016 12:44 pm

? I just told you guys there's scum within a very small pool. *shrug* You should lynch in that pool.

ISO · Post Post #6591 (ISO) » Mon Jun 06, 2016 12:46 pm

I still think the vig claiming today is stupid ftr
If it's actually a SK let them kill another scummy person to keep up their act tonight. If they kill someone townie then they confirm a SK.

dramonic · Post Post #6592 (ISO) » Mon Jun 06, 2016 12:47 pm

I'm glad you're confirming you're not reading the game.

ISO · Post Post #6593 (ISO) » Mon Jun 06, 2016 12:47 pm

I am reading the game ffs <.<

dramonic · Post Post #6594 (ISO) » Mon Jun 06, 2016 12:54 pm

If who gets shot tonight, changes if you want to lynch the shooter or not, you're not reading.
OR you don't understand the gamestate.

itlepip · Post Post #6595 (ISO) » Mon Jun 06, 2016 1:00 pm

I actually kind of like the idea of vigi not claiming today since with two shots on people outside of the auto circle we get an extra lynch, but since I could be RBed and he might be SK that reasoning is weaker.

pistachi0n · Post Post #6596 (ISO) » Mon Jun 06, 2016 1:15 pm

In post 6590, Cerberus v666 wrote:? I just told you guys there's scum within a very small pool. *shrug* You should lynch in that pool.

That's what I'm trying to do.

dramonic · Post Post #6597 (ISO) » Mon Jun 06, 2016 1:43 pm

What exactly are you calling the auto circle?

pistachi0n · Post Post #6598 (ISO) » Mon Jun 06, 2016 1:46 pm

I think it's you, podo, Cakez, Mirhawk, and Cerb.

dramonic · Post Post #6599 (ISO) » Mon Jun 06, 2016 1:49 pm

Why do you assume those 5?