In post 179, Accountant wrote:The reason I changed my mind about drealmerz is twofold:
1) I was engaged in a protracted argument with him. I'm always suspicious of scumreads arising from stuff like that, because it's statistically unlikely for the person I hop into a game with and immediately get into a shouting match with to just coincidentally happen to be scum. It's far more likely to be confirmation bias - indeed, I found fewer instances of hypocrisy, misrepresentations and inconsistency than I thought existed when I went over both our ISOs in the writing up of the case above.
2) Marquis once said that since town are more likely to appear than scum, it's okay to throw away a body of scummy posts if you find a single post that you think is impossible to come from scum. I have not found such a post, but I have found something that is sufficiently unlikely to come from scum that it outweighs the evidence against drealmerz. Namely, this quote:
I like this reasoning too.
In post 187, copper223 wrote:Because of human nature, once you get into a discussion with someone else you want to prove you are right so you're often going to use the best argument you can come up with regardless of whether it can be applied to what you posted as well, also it's hard not to have a double standard when considering yourself (and knowing your alignment) and other people.
Some more good points, I can relate to this.
Could you possibly explain your reasons for this vote? (sorry if you already gave reasons a couple of pages ago and I missed them).
Current Reads:
Leaning town - Accountant, drealmerz, copper, Stapler
No real read - everyone else
Yes, I have no scumreads. No, this isn't normal for me, and I'm surprised I don't, but I haven't actually read a post yet which I deem as sufficiently scummy to warrant a scumread or vote. I did slightly scumread DDD's predecessor oncilla based on gut feelings, but I should probably put that aside since he has been replaced. After all, my own predecessor said some quite weird things.... Maybe I should do some more rereading.