Either I didn't explain myself throughout D1/early D2 clear enough, it got swept away in confirmation bias, or it was an intentional misrepresentation after being put at L-1. I'm leaning towards the first one honestly.
There was like, a day, where I thought Enefpe/Karnos was a sensible scumteam, but when looking back on
439 reminds me too much of the bad scumhunting I pointed out earlier and rescinded it because it was bad scumhunting. When the pendulum swung back, I thought it swung too far because I had started to look at Karnos as if he could do no wrong, which was almost as bad as before. I'd rather remain suspicious of town than completely overlook scum.
The next few paragraphs are complete misunderstandings of the reasons I changed my vote on Karnos. At that time, I was thinking "eh Karnos miiiiiiiiiight be scum maybe" but I was still thinking Enefpe/Enomis and Transcend was the scumteam. When I discover that "omg Enomis is like almost definitely not scum" the pairing I thought clearly couldn't be accurate. Karnos was my #3 at the time, and when my #1 suddenly becomes conf-town, #3 becomes #2.
You (Karnos) changing your opinion on Enomis, as well as pushing to get Enomis to claim, are hardly why my opinion changed (and tbh it did not change that much, just the rest of the environment changed). Stove pushed for the reveal, I pushed for the reveal, Karnos pushed for the reveal, and even Transcend pushed for the reveal (which in hindsight I probably should have taken into more account). And, whoa, Stove unvoted, I unvoted, and you (Karnos) unvoted. Crazy that this then has nothing to do with why I voted for you is it?
Ultimately, like I said, it has so much more to do with the fact that my #1 dropped out of the scum-race and you as #3 jumped up to #2
Cool, that's done, let's see where we're at now.
