fuck this shitIn post 749, Revan wrote:Going to try and write up a case on UD tomorrow if I have the time.
could be useless town.
but really he has done nothing all game. no inclination to find scum whatsoever.
scum revan, ud and fitz/hans
fuck this shitIn post 749, Revan wrote:Going to try and write up a case on UD tomorrow if I have the time.
So basic VCA and situational analysis (FC/Sesq were probably doomed, no other wagons had much momentum other than a brief spurt towards revan) means that virtually always you're gonna have at least one, and probably two, scum in the off voters (theoretically you might even have three, but that seems unlikely IMO). The interesting question given the vote counts is whether hans/revan might actually be w/w with a nice distancing setup.
Here's the thing, though: your actual questionsIn post 712, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Color me unimpressed with this response. The whole point of the exercise is to highlight what I see as fake-reads from your slot. Your ISO shows some softball questions tossed towards Moz Day 1 that supposedly pointed to a scum read. Yet today you’ve conspicuously avoided voting for the slot up until just now. And I don’t see anything in your Day 2 ISO that says “I revoked that read” (in fact you in this response squash that notion) or significant scum-hunting elsewhere (I discount your back and forth with Lucca as that is mostly driven by disproving his read on you not commenting on his alignment).In post 690, Ultimate Despair wrote:I don't even get where you're coming from on point 1. We had a bunch of posts addressing and discussing Moz on day 1; are you asking us to restate our reasoning? Did you miss it? Like, what exactly are you getting at here, because it would be fairly difficult to miss our thoughts on Moz from day 1, and we have under 100 posts, so it would be hard to miss given the ISO feature. If you have questions about our read from day 1 ask them, but it's not my job to rehash previous events for your convenience.
I really should let junko answer for herself, but here goesWhat do you think specifically is scummy about those posts?In post 711, Ultimate Despair wrote:Not a discussed vote with my hydra partner ftr, but im sure mukuro will agree given 701 and 702.
--
I don't think I hate this one as much as Junko, but I'll note she made a LAMIST note about it in hydra threadIn post 701, mozamis wrote:UNVOTE
HE SEEMD A BIT BLAND BUT HIS LAST FEW POSTS HAVE BEEN "SCUM HUNTERY" SO HE'S BACK TO NULL
This one is worse. It's a "POE" that doesn't seem especially strong (as a simple example, the very post before, he bumped Lucca to "null", which strikes me as a poor basis of using POE to create scum reads, if you're to the point where you're dumping out null reads). It's also super hedgy on revan, while expressing an interest in focusing on fitz/us (not clear why). I'll let junko talk about if she saw more than that, but that's where my take is.In post 702, mozamis wrote:leaving p.oe
wguerts, rev, UD and fitz as possible scum
of these i wgeurts i guess is the weakest scum read, since he looked very fucking town earlier on. But as someone else mentioned, his total lack of content ment that that his towniness has evaporated.
Still, rev ud and fitz i guess makes more sense.
dan, i thought rev was looking more town so thats confusing. Still, i could vote him.
But we should focus on fitz and UD, and work out the last scummer later.
Pretty much. The point being that he's such an easy target that scum would have gone after him by now were he town.In post 742, havingfitz wrote:Lol...so what are you saying about his lack of wagonning? That it suggests he could be scum?In post 738, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Yet aside from being occasionally scum-read there is no inclination to wagon him
Well, in the event that Moz flips town, I doin't know that there's anyone in particular that screams out scum due to that flip.In post 697, Superhans wrote:I wanna know. Don't buy your point that it being nightless invidates this question, I think that pre flips can generate pretty insightful content.In post 691, Ultimate Despair wrote:Why do you care about this? I'll admit that I occasionally do pre-flip associations when I'm in the mood, but w'ere in a game without a night kill, which means that there's probably LESS utility from this than usual. Like, say moz is lynched and flips scum and then we get day-vigged before we can talk about associations. While there would be less of a legacy on our end, there would also be the benefit that scum is out of kill shots, which strikes me as a perfectly fine outcome.
TLDR: I'm not especially in the mood to discuss pre-flip associations, although I suppose that's potentially subject to change if I get in the mood.
-M
Name 2 things you've done.In post 752, Revan wrote:I've done a lot actually, just haven't put it down yet. I have a lot of stuff in my head.
Wguerts should vote. It's late.In post 739, karnos wrote:
wgeurts & revan are being prodded.
(expired on 2017-02-04 09:00:01) until deadline.
Revan hasn't made a scum argument on me ALL day and his vote is still on me.In post 749, Revan wrote:Going to try and write up a case on UD tomorrow if I have the time.
In post 764, Revan wrote:Before I start making my mega posts, MOO referred to me as lynchbait. On my home site, I was mislynched a lot and I came here trying to improve that. Does anyone have any tips?
In post 746, Superhans wrote:i'd rather lynch Revan today tbh,
like i know im going to get shit for it, cos it looks like im backing off of Moz, and I have been accused of being partners with him (im not btw @Fitz)
but i think that Revans lurking is deliberate, and scummy, think his previous post was a prod dodge. keeping his vote on me (after saying i looked better (?!)
And these are exactly the kind of posts I expected from scum after I made 738. Having gets promoted up to my likely Town pool for 743 as that is exactly the skeptical kind of approach to my post.In post 750, mozamis wrote:fuck this shit
vote revan
could be useless town.
but really he has done nothing all game. no inclination to find scum whatsoever.
scum revan, ud and fitz/hans
Play the game. Actually put in effort. This whole notion of “I’m doing stuff in my head” is pure crap and pretending otherwise is foolish. Long-deadline forums Mafia is a commitment of time. You haven’t given anything close to an acceptable level of engagement.In post 764, Revan wrote:Before I start making my mega posts, MOO referred to me as lynchbait. On my home site, I was mislynched a lot and I came here trying to improve that. Does anyone have any tips?
Then you are absolutely failing at playing forums Mafia given it is absolutely a game of written communications. This response only furthers my frustration with you as a player if you are Town. Instead of actually giving content you continue to make these empty posts.In post 767, Revan wrote:I am doing stuff in my head. I have reads, and I have opinions on who I think is scum. I just haven't gotten to a computer so I can share that with you guys.
FWIW, this is basically a classic lynchbait post. I guess I'm a bit concerned that he may be intentionally playing into it after Magna called out the lynchbait possibility less than 24 hours prior though *shrugs*In post 752, Revan wrote:I've done a lot actually, just haven't put it down yet. I have a lot of stuff in my head.
if u dont have a computer how r u writing this post?In post 767, Revan wrote:I am doing stuff in my head. I have reads, and I have opinions on who I think is scum. I just haven't gotten to a computer so I can share that with you guys.
lol subtle. u gonna vote Rev? cos i want to see it lynched.In post 765, havingfitz wrote:In post 764, Revan wrote:Before I start making my mega posts, MOO referred to me as lynchbait. On my home site, I was mislynched a lot and I came here trying to improve that. Does anyone have any tips?
Um....participate. Talk to people. Ask and answer questions. Try to find scum. Lay low when you are scu.....