Looking back twice bringing up havo’s hammer is bad.In post 1038, eth0s wrote:Is it time to bring up Havo's d1 hammer yet?
Your omgus to tchill’s post was also bad.
Looking back twice bringing up havo’s hammer is bad.In post 1038, eth0s wrote:Is it time to bring up Havo's d1 hammer yet?
What's scummy is the fact that I tried to stop him from being lynched yet you contributed to killing a VT and somehow I am still supposed to look more suspicious than you because "he didnt answer mah question hurr durr"In post 1147, Chumba wrote:Oh this should be good. Please tell what’s scummy about making you answer a question that I asked you twice to answer.In post 1127, eth0s wrote:The weird 180 on mulch? Weird how you're still focusing on that when the last thing I said about you and mulch was that I thought your 1v1 was TvT and that we shoudn't be lynching him. My gut wants to read you as town but your behavior is reading kinda scummy to me now.
I’d love to hear your explanation
He was doing genuine scum hunting. Then, as I already explained, I let Tchill get in my head. And I was also partially voting him based on omgus, which you're trying to expose me for or whatever, even though I literally just admitted that in the post you're responding to.Chumba wrote:You said mulch was doing some genuine scum hunting. Tchill’s post contradicts that statement yet you find yourself agreeing with him and the only thing I can see that changed was that mulch started scum reading you.In post 1127, eth0s wrote:Okay. Mulch came into the game and seemingly put in a shit ton of effort. I had never played with him before so I gutread him as town. I know that effort =/= town, but I know personally that when I replace into games, I am likely to talk my head off a lot when I'm town, because I need people to quickly be able to develop a town read on me. I guessed that mulch was doing what I would do. I also had no reason to scumread tacos, I never did scumread tacos, and therefore I had not been scumreading mulch's slot all game.
Then at some point mulch scumread me. I think this was during his phase of spamming the thread with single-lined responses. Then Tchill posted 688. I felt compelled to agree with Tchill's line of thinking for some reason.
So if still love to see some examples of this genuine scum hunting. I don’t really understand how you can do a 180 on somebody who was scum hunting just for being annoying or how you can agree with tchill who basically says the opposite, that mulch isn’t realy scum hunting.
It doesn’t make sense to me.
OMGUS was bad, I agree. That's part of the reason whyChumba wrote:Looking back twice bringing up havo’s hammer is bad.In post 1038, eth0s wrote:Is it time to bring up Havo's d1 hammer yet?
Your omgus to tchill’s post was also bad.
You're hilarious. The chances of me claiming today are 0%. You're more than welcome to, though.In post 1152, Tchill13 wrote:Eth0s feel free to claim.
sorry, the chances of me claiming without a massclaim are 0%**In post 1154, eth0s wrote:You're hilarious. The chances of me claiming today are 0%. You're more than welcome to, though.In post 1152, Tchill13 wrote:Eth0s feel free to claim.
you briefly scumread mulch and take no responsibility for it. "tchill got in my head." I consistently gave effort to lynch that slot.In post 1143, eth0s wrote:In post 1137, Tchill13 wrote: @Eth0s this is about profii.Well, this is the only part that mattered.In post 1025, Tchill13 wrote:but I don't like to get too far ahead of myself.
This is my main and only account as of right now.profii wrote:btw eth0s i have an answer prepped and ready to go as soon as you tell me if youre an alt or notSo you're upset that I briefly scumread mulch when you made like 10 straight posts trying to get us to lynch him? And you call me eager?Tchill13 wrote:the 180 on mulch and the opportunistic push he had on me.In post 1074, Chumba wrote:oh and I am officially never playing with mulch again acrosss all my accounts. he is clearly a troll account and doesn't care about winning or losing.
and scratch that havo vote, i forgot about ethos
VOTE: ethos
i forgot about his weird 180 on mulch and I don't think he ever responded to my question about it.
he also called out L-3 which i dont see much on site. seemed a bit eager imo.
VOTE: Tchill
You know if you are scum you can stay off wagons and criticize others. If you are town i don’t see how you can be so wishy washy on mulch and then act heroic for being off the wagon.In post 1153, eth0s wrote:What's scummy is the fact that I tried to stop him from being lynched yet you contributed to killing a VT and somehow I am still supposed to look more suspicious than you because "he didnt answer mah question hurr durr"
I can't tell if you have trouble reading or what but I just claimed responsibility for it. Sure I was influenced by you tunneling him but you're trying to push this all off onto me right now and its actually hilarious to watch it unfoldIn post 1157, Tchill13 wrote:you briefly scumread mulch and take no responsibility for it. "tchill got in my head." I consistently gave effort to lynch that slot.In post 1143, eth0s wrote:In post 1137, Tchill13 wrote: @Eth0s this is about profii.Well, this is the only part that mattered.In post 1025, Tchill13 wrote:but I don't like to get too far ahead of myself.
This is my main and only account as of right now.profii wrote:btw eth0s i have an answer prepped and ready to go as soon as you tell me if youre an alt or notSo you're upset that I briefly scumread mulch when you made like 10 straight posts trying to get us to lynch him? And you call me eager?Tchill13 wrote:the 180 on mulch and the opportunistic push he had on me.In post 1074, Chumba wrote:oh and I am officially never playing with mulch again acrosss all my accounts. he is clearly a troll account and doesn't care about winning or losing.
and scratch that havo vote, i forgot about ethos
VOTE: ethos
i forgot about his weird 180 on mulch and I don't think he ever responded to my question about it.
he also called out L-3 which i dont see much on site. seemed a bit eager imo.
VOTE: Tchill
I have an issue reading slots that Replace in or out.
I'm just saying if you want to keep hounding me about mulch when you voted on him and I didn't, that's sketchy. Sure, scum can do exactly what you just said, but I had first vote on mulch. Why would I remove it if I were scum? That's right where scum wants their vote to be..In post 1158, Chumba wrote:You know if you are scum you can stay off wagons and criticize others. If you are town i don’t see how you can be so wishy washy on mulch and then act heroic for being off the wagon.In post 1153, eth0s wrote:What's scummy is the fact that I tried to stop him from being lynched yet you contributed to killing a VT and somehow I am still supposed to look more suspicious than you because "he didnt answer mah question hurr durr"
In post 1160, Dunkerdoodles wrote:wheres my claim
I'm a bit confused. Chumba is upset because of me 180'ing my vote on mulch from town to scum. Not vice versa. So I think you are mistaken and I honestly don't know if you have a firm grasp on the situation.In post 1163, profii wrote:@eth0s
I retract my theory. You said when i replaced in, I thought you are new, so i checked the replace queue for your name and didnt get any results but looking at your history you've replaced in some games. I was going to call you a fibber but never mind. I just wanted you to admit no alts so i could pin you right down, but never mind. (I also said it was a lock town theory so you didnt get worried about what i was up to and answer honestly sorry )
anyway, I did say I was going to answer you query, so despite planning to destroy you for lying, I feel like I at least owe you one
Just to be clear, you had scum read the Taco/Mulch slot (not sure during the taco/mulch era) then at some point based on Mulchs contributions you decided to town read him. Chumba is apparently pushing you because he scum read the slot and wasn't sure what made you change your mind?
The rest of this post is based on that premise, so if I've misunderstood, ignore anything from here on in...
Idk man. But I also don’t know why you ignored my question and then got all weirdIn post 1161, eth0s wrote:I'm just saying if you want to keep hounding me about mulch when you voted on him and I didn't, that's sketchy. Sure, scum can do exactly what you just said, but I had first vote on mulch. Why would I remove it if I were scum? That's right where scum wants their vote to be..In post 1158, Chumba wrote:You know if you are scum you can stay off wagons and criticize others. If you are town i don’t see how you can be so wishy washy on mulch and then act heroic for being off the wagon.In post 1153, eth0s wrote:What's scummy is the fact that I tried to stop him from being lynched yet you contributed to killing a VT and somehow I am still supposed to look more suspicious than you because "he didnt answer mah question hurr durr"