no not really.
people lose bets constantly.
↑ Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:So you had no reason to think there would be a link between alignment and how'd I feel? I find that a little weird considering I'm the only player here where there's a strong relation between the two, as far as I know. I really got my hopes up.
↑ Fishythefish wrote:@Fenchurch: what makes you think I'm "poss scum" (56)?
↑ Fenchurch wrote:↑ Fishythefish wrote:@Fenchurch: what makes you think I'm "poss scum" (56)?
The fact that you've reacted very little to being at L-1. If you were town I would expect you be much quicker to try and defend yourself, since you would have an explanation anything you've done.
And I don't think the wagon on you was totally bad to begin with. I think your posts so far have been a little empty. Not having much to say is a scumtell imo; it implies you're having to fabricate your cases, rather than them coming naturally.
↑ Fishythefish wrote:The first reason is horrible. With no reasons given for me being at L-1, how should I have reacted? But much worse - when you posted your read, I hadn't posted since being at L-1, and had been there for exactly 5 minutes. So thiscannothave been your real reason. Makes me happy with my vote - you've gone back and invented a reason why you thought I was scum.
↑ Fishythefish wrote:For the second reason - well, at this stage of the game I'm voting on anything I find even a little bit scummy. So obviously my cases are going to look weaker than usual. I don't think that makes them "empty"...
↑ Fishythefish wrote:...compared with all the people who have basically been talking crap because it's the RVS.
↑ Fishythefish wrote:And still, this just can't have been your reason in 56. Because
a) as you say, it had only been 30 minutes sinceanyonehad voted for me.
. . .
I asked you what you meant in 56, and you responded with something you can't sensibly have been thinking when you made that post.
↑ Fishythefish wrote:b) my only posts in that timewereasking for reasons from Faraday and refuting the only point actually made against me (by Elli).
↑ Fishythefish wrote:2. What do you mean by "fake-empty", and how do you tell the difference between it and "weak-empty"?
↑ Fenchurch wrote:No, I don't actually know your alignment preference; but I still like to know the answer to the question. Even without knowing your preference (and frankly I don't expect it makes a big difference, as scum I wouldn't expect you to give a truthful answer) it can still be useful to gauge whether the response is truthful or whether you are hiding something.
↑ Fishythefish wrote:1. So, you really are claiming that you thought I was scum based on the following:
9:47 - Faraday votes Fishy
9:50 - Fishy asks why
9:51 - Elli gives a reason; Faraday tells Fishy to guess why
9:59 - Fishy answers the reason, and doesn't guess
10:00 - 10:27 - Two more people vote Fishy; Fishy doesn't post.
Your reason reduces tohalf an hour of inactivity. Nothing else. That's what you're calling scummy. And that's what I find totally unbelievable. If I've misunderstood you, please explain what I'm missing.
↑ Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:Kiwi, with me!