Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2014 5:57 pm
Por qué
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
↑ POWERFUL TOWNIE wrote:↑ zMuffinMan wrote:do you think that was a slip, ap?
No it obviously wasn't, don't be coy.
Yeah, was thinking that, too.↑ POWERFUL TOWNIE wrote:Anybody scumreading muffin after this post is bad at mafia.
Agreed.↑ POWERFUL TOWNIE wrote:This is an excellent lynch candidate as well.↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:sorry slandaar, your reads are flawed. I'm town so one of those on your town list most likely isn't
it hurts bud i know
Sure, I can roll with these.
Probably not.
There was no missing kill.↑ Messiah Complex wrote:and there's no explanation given for how mastin went from town to null other than her being alive (after he docced her) makes him feel weird
↑ zMuffinMan wrote:↑ POWERFUL TOWNIE wrote:↑ zMuffinMan wrote:do you think that was a slip, ap?
No it obviously wasn't, don't be coy.
do you think titus believes it's a slip?
Meh.↑ ReallySexyDudes wrote:↑ TheAdrienC wrote:RSD, what's your case on Mastin and SKOT?
Mastin isn't interacting with me or Venmar, which isreallyfucking weird.
You'll note I'm more than happy to lynch SKOT, by the way.SKOT caught our attention with the Sala gambit, and has continued to opportunistically hop and make really awkward looking posts.
Well aside from the softclaim, there was the whole way Pants handled Salamance, and the way Pants handled DGB, and overall pushes and presence in the game. Just has seemed town, trying to figure out the game, entire time.↑ POWERFUL TOWNIE wrote:Can someone who think Dr. Pants is town give me a case for it?
He seems like a popular townread but Im not seeing it exactly.
Good↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:¯\_(ツ)_/¯
The only point I'm convinced by is the vezok slot's night actions not reconciling with reads, but that's already been said 100 times.
Slardar, your response to my suspecting you was valid - I don't really have a follow-up. It makes me uncomfortable that you're more or less Presumed Innocent but I think that was the extent of my suspicions.
I'm not super helpful with so many players and so few lynches.
VOTE: Vezok
↑ TheAdrienC wrote:It looked like a slip to me. And there was some speculation about that slot awhile back. I still think my vote is on the right person, but I would be okay with Muffin being lynched too.
↑ POWERFUL TOWNIE wrote:↑ zMuffinMan wrote:do you think that was a slip, ap?
No it obviously wasn't, don't be coy.
For someone claiming I'm evading.↑ Xisiqomelir wrote:The appeal to authority is gratuitous. Being in an uninformed majority is what the game is predicated on, and I have to make the best decisions I can with what information I have. Your hastening to respond to every point with dismissal rather than engagement is making me feel that my decision is highly sound.
Because I was sure DGB was town and that both the other members of the neighborhood were town and I am a strong believer in the meta nowadays being three town neighbors rather than two town and a scum.1) Why were you so highly insistent yesterday that the neighbourhood contained zero scum?
Done no such thing. I've acknowledged a stance I've held. I've also insisted said stance is no longer relevant, given that it's been proven wrong. It either was alignment-indicative or it wasn't, but going down the tangent about the stance is not productive since there's nothing to be gained from the elaboration. It's just me going into detail about something I quite clearly believed.2) Why are you hastening to avoid having to acknowledge your own prior stance?
Because they're on things that aren't relevant. Erroneous read, sure, yeah. But aside from a specific version of the traitor role, my alignment regardless, I wouldn't have known DGB was a traitor thus the erroneous read would not be alignment-indicative. And let's say it was. Then it'd be the reasons behind my townread that you'd be questioning, which didn't revolve around the neighborhood, but rather, the way DGB was acting. Basically, you're focusing on the part of the read that holds not relevance (my stance on the neighborhood) rather than the only part that could POSSIBLY be alignment-relevant (my stance on DGB).4) How is it not valid to query your positions and reasoning for those positions when they are proven to be erroneous?
Is still saying exactly what I said it was. You said you are not in a rush to lynch zMuffinman. That implies, however, that you can. "Not in a rush" = "will lynch, but not before others". You said you'd prefer not to lynch either, but you also said you'd be willing to lynch either.My post:↑ Xisiqomelir wrote:-I didn't think bookitty was scum. I am slightly perturbed that muffin's push on me doesn't involve interacting with me, butI'm notto fling rope in that directionin arush
-No one should cc vezok's claim, and the claim itself is peculiarly early. I guess this is lynchable but I would far prefer mastin
Trolling, and those voting him for it are idiots.↑ AngryPidgeon wrote:Muffin what the hell are you doing
↑ mastin2 wrote:There was no missing kill.↑ Messiah Complex wrote:and there's no explanation given for how mastin went from town to null other than her being alive (after he docced her) makes him feel weird
Thus, I was not scumkilled.
Thus, vezok's concern after doccing me is valid.
You'd have a point if vezok said this after a failed kill.
But he didn't.
Point invalid.
I don't see how this is a point.
Who said you were null? That's a lesser town list. Frankly, as is, I already have one too many scumread. As for vezok...because the case against vezok is (pardon the language) absolute crap?↑ Messiah Complex wrote:@ mastin: why the fuck are we still null? and why are you assuming vezok is town?