Mafiascum.net

↑ Guilty Gunsmith wrote:EtL should be happy Im deciding to trust her ZZZX read.

She needs to trust my BBT read though.

Swifty has been nothing but town Today.

like, i agree with all this.

bbt looks like he's getting set up.

let's lynch josh.

Anti, you acting like something is obvious is a very dangerous way of thinking. I see all your points on why you think BBT is scum, but they can all be explained by BBT simply being in the wrong place at the wrong time in terms of his reads or by Flubbernugget being scum and wanting to intentionally mislead everyone. I submit to you that ZZZX has no such explanation for his behavior the first day and he's been avoiding my most recent line of questioning. He has yet to explain to me why AP is a scumread of his and now he's making this broad assertion that scum was on the Flubbernugget lynch yesterday which is as unsubstantiated as it is self-serving.

Articulate your townread on ZZZX. It has to see the light of day now. I thought I asked you to do this a while ago, and it never ended up getting done. If it sounds like I'm a little irritated with you, I am. Please do this.

: Don't you dare shut down on me. You and Antihero can have your little Alpha male fight later, but we're still left with issues now. If that takes pages of discussion, so be it. I'm willing to have that talk, why aren't you?

: Let's talk about your Josh read. Given that Flubbernugget was one of Josh's most vocal detractors for a good portion of the day, why is it you seem to think they're teammates?

-TTH

totes, in a bit. i might be completely wrong. i gotta go do some work first.

↑ Heartless wrote:You and Antihero can have your little Alpha male fight later

↑ Heartless wrote:If that takes pages of discussion, so be it. I'm willing to have that talk, why aren't you?

Because the anti-depressants I'm taking are making me more confident about myself and I really wanna
people instead of going on and on about logic in a game where logic only gets you so far.

I'm going to make a case.

↑ T S O wrote:

Unvote
Vote: Josh_B

I don't really see the other two.

↑ T S O wrote:I voted Josh, because he is really the only person I'm scumreading atm (excluding you).

↑ T S O wrote:I'm hard scumreading Josh

↑ T S O wrote:1. Guilty Gunsmith (AngryPidgeon + EspeciallyTheLies) - ns
2. BlueBloodedToffee - ns
3. Lying Cat - nt
4. awestfie - n
5. Josh_B - s
6. Flubbernugget - nt
7. ZZZX - t
8. Heartless - nt
9. T S O - t

↑ T S O wrote:I think Josh is scum.

You think Josh is scum.

There's a natural follow-up to this.

↑ T S O wrote:

↑ Josh_B wrote:@Heartless, I'm actually fine with my vote. It's these two votes that I'm concerned about...

Lying Cat - [2] - Guilty Gunsmith, awestfie
BlueBloodedToffee - [2] - Heartless, T S O

Translation: I have a problem with any wagon larger than 1.

↑ Josh_B wrote:Especialy considering that there are so many Vote Kangaroos.

Translation: I have a kangaroo fetish.

↑ Josh_B wrote:Guilty Gunsmith, you are probably the chief. It took me a while to get it, but I think I'm going to jump off of any wagon that grows past two. At least for D1, and probably for D2. We can't no lynch, but I can un-voat.

Translation: I am not allowed to be on wagons with more than two votes for the first two days.

↑ Josh_B wrote:I thought I got the game at first, but then I was like ok, I guess, I have to vote someone, and now I'm like, no I really don't. As long as the vote count stays low, I'm good. 3 votes are probably enough to lynch. Unless it's scum, and then they get a 2 vote boost on whoever they want. I probably won't be upvoting anyone past the highest number of votes, and I'm probably going to stay vote parked for the rest of the phase, unless it becomes more obvious that someone is scum.

Translation: I have finally learned how to play Mafia. Votepark every day, and if the largest wagon is at L-4, putting it or any other wagon to L-3 is tantamount to idiocy. Scum have superpowers called "2 vote boost."

↑ Josh_B wrote:

@mod How will you decide plurality if two people have the same number of votes? If you send it to Random.org, Will players be included who have had the most total votes against them, the highest number of votes at thread closing, or the highest number of votes gained? [/bold]

Translation: I'm advocating not reaching a majority.

↑ T S O wrote:I still believe there's scum in Josh/BBT.

That was the case.

TSO had a boner for lynching Josh.

TSO dies.

Who dunnit?

↑ Wickedestjr wrote:1 or 2 Mafia vs. 2 Chosen is a town win.

Jesus why didn't I think of this. There is literally no way scum can win unless we mislynch chosen townies.

AP, vote no lynch please.

The scum can't kill the chosen, they have to lynch them. Let them kill people, while we no lynch to victory.

FFS etl we can't no lynch. that was a day 1 conversation/

I have more case on josh, but im busy right now.

Are you shitting me sthar? Mr. I no-lynch-no-kill-3-days-in-a-row because that was the way to win!?

↑ Wickedestjr wrote:In order for the town to perform a no-lynch, you would have to first ignore the part where I said you couldn't no-lynch and then embarrass yourselves trying to do it even though you can't.

i'm a fucking dipshit

↑ EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Are you shitting me sthar? Mr. I no-lynch-no-kill-3-days-in-a-row because that was the way to win!?

sometimes it is. not here though.

↑ EspeciallyTheLies wrote:The scum can't kill the chosen, they have to lynch them. Let them kill people, while we no lynch to victory.

That was actually plan at the beginning, and what followed is the reason I started town reading zzzx. I'm not sure what my normal playstyle is, but if you mean erratically jumping to conclusions and never being right? I am trying to change that but I'm still working on it.

Besides what I've already said, BBT also said that there wasn't a bus on D1, yet in order for him to vote me, he has to believe that there was a bus.

Town {Heartless, Josh B, ZZZX}

BBT flips town, this order: LC, Swifty.

LC, your push on Josh despite common sense is troubling.

AP, TSO also had a boner for lynching us. So.....

You wanna cool your shit for a while and then talk to me about it AP?

I'm off work in like five hours.

Resisting the scum lynch....

i have a reason. and i want to talk through it. i'm not saying you're wrong; i'm saying i have misgivings...

↑ Guilty Gunsmith wrote:

↑ Heartless wrote:You and Antihero can have your little Alpha male fight later

I don't need any of your sass, Mister AngryPidgeon.

Don't make me come smack the pretty off your face.

↑ Heartless wrote:If that takes pages of discussion, so be it. I'm willing to have that talk, why aren't you?

Because the anti-depressants I'm taking are making me more confident about myself and I really wanna
people instead of going on and on about logic in a game where logic only gets you so far.

You've changed your mind quite a few times since this day's started, AP. It sounds like the logic games are still at play to me.

Guilty Gunsmith wrote:That was the case.

TSO had a boner for lynching Josh.

TSO dies.

Who dunnit?

Nightkills for townies don't seem to imply good reads. I've only finished one game and I've already figured that out. Anything else?

-TTH

↑ Heartless wrote:Anything else?

Please TTH! TRUSSSSSSST.

ETL

ETL, this isn't really about if I "trust" you or Anti or anyone else.

Of course I respect you all and your opinions, I just want to get this right.

-TTH

Man, Z', you are posting up a storm all over the site but here! Golly!

No etL is right though you are totally town.