Mafiascum.net

No. Titus is scum

VOTE: Titus

Care to develop on this vote?

Don't argue with obvious night result.

VOTE: Titus

personally im also not understanding why titus is the obvious scum...

VOTE: Pickaxe Pete

I was wrong day 1 on shelley.

@DGB,

You and I both know that reading the rules a night result is impossible. Why the fake?

To be fair, night results aren't impossible, i'd like an answer from eddie though

In post 1027, DrippingGoofball wrote:Don't argue with obvious night result.

VOTE: Titus

I don't understand. The night kill?

In post 1030, Gypyx wrote:To be fair, night results aren't impossible, i'd like an answer from eddie though

If they exist they're not obvious.

In post 1029, Titus wrote:VOTE: Pickaxe Pete

I was wrong day 1 on shelley.

@DGB,

You and I both know that reading the rules a night result is impossible. Why the fake?

That's the joke.

I am working on the assumption that the gladiate was some kind of shenanigan outside of our roles.

Given that mindset, a night result is not completely impossible, but I would give it a very low probability.

Here's another joke, hardy har har, ladies and germs:


VOTE: EddieFenix

In post 1026, Gypyx wrote:Care to develop on this vote?

Titus has been on both of the town lynches that have happened. I can see her making smart plans and kills to keep the heat down.

In post 1036, EddieFenix wrote:Titus has been on both of the town lynches that have happened.

So what? What a cheap way to reward lurkers, non-voters, the uncommitted and the wishy-washy scumbaggos.

EddieFenix's scum pals are lurksacks, mark my words.

In post 1021, EddieFenix wrote:After sheeping Titus day 1 and coming back to a green flip after the weekend, I'm holding my vote to use it wisely.

Hey

Did you guys decide to keep her alive because you thought you could frame her?

In post 714, EddieFenix wrote:

Spoiler:

In post 713, Tayl0r Swift wrote:

In post 712, EddieFenix wrote:

In post 707, Titus wrote:

In post 702, EddieFenix wrote:

In post 698, Titus wrote:I propose that if we hit scum, regardless of who we lynch, that we keep lynching in these 3 until we hit town or win lol.

What if we hit town right off?

If we hit town right off, we do VCA.

If I die, force Taylor to do it.

Not my favorite way to do it. Wouldn't you want to take care of the VCA yourself?

yes if titus is dead titus will definitely want to do the VCA

That's assuming Titus dies.

HA LOOK AT THAT

In post 787, EddieFenix wrote:Thank you Titus and Fidget.

Taylor and Gypyx, who would you shoot if you had a free bullet?

In post 820, EddieFenix wrote:To the Gladiator's: Who would you shoot with a free bullet?

In post 849, EddieFenix wrote:PJ, could you answer my free bullet shot question, please. I'd appreciate it . Same for you, DGB when you get the time.

In post 890, EddieFenix wrote:

In post 858, Marashu wrote:@Eddie what are you trying to accomplish?

I have a plan that I wish to not reveal yet. However, if you had a shot, who would you shoot?

Who would you shoot?
Who would you shoot?
Who would you shoot?
Who would you shoot?
Who would you shoot?
Who would you shoot?
Who would you shoot?
I HAVE PLANZZZZ

That was a whole lot of scummy nothing, wasting the town's time.

You're not looking for scum, your whole strategy is to cause unforced errors in as many players as possible so that you can fabricate scum cases later.

In post 1024, Gypyx wrote:Hmmmm... weird kill tbh, and no gladiate

VOTE: Vecna

The ISO looks pretty bad upon re-reading it, anyone else in for this wagon?

hmm ive been townreading vecna to this point. what exactly did you see in the iso?

to be clear eddie, the reason you think titus is scum is that she was on both wagons? that sounds like the sort of weak bullshit id make up as scum to look solvy. why isnt she simply a confused townie?

In post 950, Nosferatu wrote:ive been scumreading gypyx ever since 97

Do you still scumreak gypyx?

In post 1044, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 950, Nosferatu wrote:ive been scumreading gypyx ever since 97

Do you still scumreak gypyx?

i call BS on that post anyway - nos joined the site in 15, gypyx this year, yet nos claims to have had a scumread for over 20 years?

is it safe to assume that at least one trial was passed since we are not in "maximum failure"?

i think not actually. the conditions for maximum failure are that we mislunch all three times AND two trials are failed. nevermind.

In post 1045, Tayl0r Swift wrote:i call BS on that post anyway - nos joined the site in 15, gypyx this year, yet nos claims to have had a scumread for over 20 years?

You can win the game.

In post 1045, Tayl0r Swift wrote:

In post 1044, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 950, Nosferatu wrote:ive been scumreading gypyx ever since 97

Do you still scumreak gypyx?

i call BS on that post anyway - nos joined the site in 15, gypyx this year, yet nos claims to have had a scumread for over 20 years?

We know each other irl since about 30 years and he managed to guess that i was going to roll scum this game