Mafiascum.net

In post 1142, Hench Princesses wrote:

In post 1136, unwnd wrote:These are posts that I made that are only now flaring up in your mind

those were reasonable concerns initially but they're also superficial and attack the possibility of town cohesion. What if scum leads on the vote flip? What if scum dominates the conversation? Fearmongering scum controlling one mech but not others is scummy. You're acting scummy in this argument, and I think the reason you're acting scummy about mech through fearmongering at this point is because you're scum. The way you're approaching my slot right now in our interactions is *very not town*

I feel like you pretty much said nothing here

In post 2, SirCakez wrote:During pregame, the Sator Operatives may decide how to distribute themselves between the two timestreams.

does this mean scum get to decide the numbers alone and then they are randomized or does this mean scum get to choose which members of their faction are in which thread?

In post 1150, unwnd wrote:I feel like you pretty much said nothing here

if you take everything you said, and said it about the vote and flip, the conclusion would be that town shouldn't vote for vote eliminations because scum might lead the vote elimination

do you get how that argument is both stupid and stupid in a scummy way?

In post 1151, Hench Princesses wrote:

In post 2, SirCakez wrote:During pregame, the Sator Operatives may decide how to distribute themselves between the two timestreams.

@Cakez

does this mean scum get to decide the numbers alone and then they are randomized or does this mean scum get to choose which members of their faction are in which thread?

Both. Already asked that question.

I didn’t realize they got to decide too, my b

It does not feel like you are trying to read me, rather read the circumstance I was in

We're past it, I asked you again and you still can't answer: Why was it town consensus. It feels like you're leading your argument only based on faith because you happened to agree with the plan and nothing else. I'm trying to get you to give me reads on the situation and instead you just wanna tell me I'm scummy.

unwnd you're arguing town should not play to win because scum might try to win too

stop making scummy, bad arguments if you are town

Do you just ignore posts you don't like?

@Flavor so call you’ve called 2/3 of the pool I said scum was in on that side scum js

Annie, do you have general reads?

Currently the people I want out are contained in {pisskop, Pooky, Shelly} with A50 and Titus knocking on the outside though both are trending up. Do you have any concerns outside of that pool?

In post 1155, unwnd wrote:Why was it town consensus.

why was it not?

In post 1157, unwnd wrote:Do you just ignore posts you don't like?

the scummier you act, the more of your posts I will ignore

In post 919, Hench Princesses wrote:VOTE: brian skies

Can the people hard town on brian expand on why he's town beyond 'he agreed with me on some stuff'?

-E

I personally have nothing specific to point out (as in: quote a post and point out why scum Brian wouldn't say that), but I think his overall tone is genuine. I -of course- don't like his execution/elimination choices, but c'est la vie.

..Just commit to a read on why you felt it was town consensus. As in, you saying 'it was town consensus' means you thought everyone who agreed must've been town.

Yet your actions don't dictate this. Yet you have Pooky as null.

In post 1154, Annie Edison wrote:I didn’t realize they got to decide too, my b

unfortunately the window for townie dumbtells has passed but if this was like 24 hours ago I'd probably hard town you for this

Your stance;
I am scummy because I was being a maverick and going against town consensus, it was a good plan and you're scum for not wanting to use mech to our advantage

My stance:
You are being weird about not explaining why you think a plan co-opted within the first 5 pages of the game was town consensus, and you refuse to explain why you thought it was, because implying TOWN consensus means you think everyone who agreed was town.

In post 1160, Hench Princesses wrote:

In post 1155, unwnd wrote:Why was it town consensus.

why was it not?

In post 1163, unwnd wrote:..Just commit to a read on why you felt it was town consensus. As in, you saying 'it was town consensus' means you thought everyone who agreed must've been town.

Yet your actions don't dictate this. Yet you have Pooky as null.

I don't think this is a particularly important argument that is alignment-indicative for either of you. Could one of you explain why the "town consensus" piece is such a sticking point?

I think HP and Skitter are teamed based on my reading so far. Slight chance Skitter is whiteknighting HP but Skitter's reaction to peta's push is really bad.

In post 1163, unwnd wrote:As in, you saying 'it was town consensus' means you thought everyone who agreed must've been town.

it doesn't mean that at all. It means *everyone* was for it that was posting. The ONLY voice of opposition I remember is you. If there's 5 players for it, and one player against, and six people who aren't objecting, then that's a town consensus imo

I can get you thinking I'm saying I think everyone saying it was a good idea was town but that has never been what I was implying, I was saying there was no voice of opposition to the plan on this side of the timestream that really was making any good, coherent argument against it. So it sounds like you're trying to present your own fearmongering as a sign there wasn't town consensus. If we're totally misunderstanding each other because you totally misrepresented what I mean by "town consensus" that's too bad but I don't like the way you were approaching my titus vote either at this point and your fearmongering looks even scummier now that you bring it up again

In post 1166, Imperium wrote:

In post 1160, Hench Princesses wrote:

In post 1155, unwnd wrote:Why was it town consensus.

why was it not?

In post 1163, unwnd wrote:..Just commit to a read on why you felt it was town consensus. As in, you saying 'it was town consensus' means you thought everyone who agreed must've been town.

Yet your actions don't dictate this. Yet you have Pooky as null.

I don't think this is a particularly important argument that is alignment-indicative for either of you. Could one of you explain why the "town consensus" piece is such a sticking point?

Usually town consensus to me is a phrase used once you've established more in the game to get there. I'm not trying to be petty in word usage but if they think it was town consensus then everyone who agreed must've just been town for...?

In post 1165, unwnd wrote:Your stance;
I am scummy because I was being a maverick and going against town consensus, it was a good plan and you're scum for not wanting to use mech to our advantage

My stance:
You are being weird about not explaining why you think a plan co-opted within the first 5 pages of the game was town consensus, and you refuse to explain why you thought it was, because implying TOWN consensus means you think everyone who agreed was town.

Most people agreed with the plan. I don't think it's crazy calling it town consensus - maybe not everyone agreed, but most did and you were the only one vocally opposed. Town consensus doesn't mean that everyone who agrees is town - you're misunderstanding the term there.

Hench's views of the mechanics are opinionated and polarizing but not necessarily correct; in particular, her view of the scum-sided portion of the setup and how it can only be reversed based on strong mechanics play is a bit chicken little, but I don't think there would be that much conviction behind that talk if she did not believe it.

In post 1168, Hench Princesses wrote:

In post 1163, unwnd wrote:As in, you saying 'it was town consensus' means you thought everyone who agreed must've been town.

it doesn't mean that at all. It means *everyone* was for it that was posting. The ONLY voice of opposition I remember is you. If there's 5 players for it, and one player against, and six people who aren't objecting, then that's a town consensus imo

I can get you thinking I'm saying I think everyone saying it was a good idea was town but that has never been what I was implying, I was saying there was no voice of opposition to the plan on this side of the timestream that really was making any good, coherent argument against it. So it sounds like you're trying to present your own fearmongering as a sign there wasn't town consensus. If we're totally misunderstanding each other because you totally misrepresented what I mean by "town consensus" that's too bad but I don't like the way you were approaching my titus vote either at this point and your fearmongering looks even scummier now that you bring it up again

Do you townread the people who agreed yes or no and if not why. I'm not doing this lol

In post 1165, unwnd wrote:because implying TOWN consensus means you think everyone who agreed was town.

like really?

I feel like scum is way more likely to make some sort of weird leap like this

In post 1171, unwnd wrote:Do you townread the people who agreed yes or no and if not why. I'm not doing this lol

You're misunderstanding the phrase town consensus, as I mentioned in my last post. This is a silly argument.

In post 1171, unwnd wrote:Do you townread the people who agreed yes or no and if not why. I'm not doing this lol

You're complaining about me not giving reads, but I have already given those reads and you are simply too lazy to connect to the players that agreed with the plan.

Yes, I have already stated townreads on some of the players that agreed with the plan