Mafiascum.net

In post 1173, MURDERCAT wrote:I was like one of the first people to claim

In post 1174, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:its basically a shot in the dark if scum get their bonus NK without any accountability.

In post 1177, MURDERCAT wrote:Can't we reconstruct that knowledge from the hoods though? I'm not convinced that knowing it in advance changes anything in that regard.

In post 1175, Akarin wrote:

In post 1173, MURDERCAT wrote:I was like one of the first people to claim

and?

In post 1178, Akarin wrote:So show me where I'm wrong then.

I thought I demonstrated pretty clearly why you can't reconstruct it from the hoods.

In post 1180, MURDERCAT wrote:And you are acting like I am tip toeing when I have clearly been in favor of claiming the whole time. Have you even claimed your rooms yet? What I'm not convinced of is that we know enough about the setup to force others to agree, because basically the only way to do this is to threaten to vote them out otherwise. I think that not wanting share info is a reasonable position a townie might have and so I'm not in favor of voting people out if they don't comply. And if we aren't willing to do that then there is no way to actually get people to group how we want.

In post 1179, Titus wrote:Can we move on to no elimination and compliance? I am bored and this feels like an RVS that will last forever.

In post 1058, SirCakez wrote:I'm not voting BM?
If you mean others, I think they are unfamiliar with him. He has a...unique playstyle

In post 1060, Gamma Emerald wrote:Cakez has been defending bm

In post 1064, Titus wrote:

In post 1063, Akarin wrote:SIGH

I wasn't at any point suggesting going to random rooms.

The assumption of random is that everyone just doing one of their tasks amounts to random rooms, assuming roughly equal distribution of tasks among the rooms.

Except it doesn't. For instance, Alisae has two tasks. One takes her to electrical the other to another room. By actively selecting electrical, we force a room of three (assuming BM lives).

That's a strong reason for BM to live. He has to try and complete his one task and can have another passed off to him from the dead corpse. It's a win-win situation regardless of BM's alignment.

In post 1083, Titus wrote:

In post 1081, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1064, Titus wrote:It's a win-win situation regardless of BM's alignment.

Not if he's scum????

It is.

We force him to take a task. It auto completes. If he refuses, we kill him.

The task lets us also control what room he goes to. So he's a liability to scum.

In post 1084, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 793, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 784, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:wait r we going to compete to see who has the worst post restriction

i got one that makes me post in rhyming couplets

i dont even know what rhyming couplets are.

just stay alert
don't drop your guard
you might get hurt
if i tunnel you hard

this is rather wrong
it's much like a song
each odd and even line
must have a rhyme to be fine

In post 1093, Akarin wrote:I need to go to sleep, but I just really wanted to hammer this home because I feel like a bunch of people are being unrealistic about the POE chances after a double NK.

And people keep picking at little things without really acknowledging the point I’m trying to make, but I feel like I need to answer those things.

If we just all do tasks willy-nilly,

2 town are going to die every night

and there will

not

be useful POE to figure out who killed them.

In exchange, we avoid giving scum information and we get the tasks done slightly faster. I don't think this is worth it, and I haven't actually seen an argument that it is, beyond vague handwaving and dogmatism.

In post 1179, Titus wrote:Can we move on to no elimination and compliance? I am bored and this feels like an RVS that will last forever.

In post 1183, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:i think we need to start eliming in the no room claim pool


we can probly hit bad guys

and if they're townies we were never going to win this game

VOTE: Reck

my tolerance for gamethrowing is gone

In post 1183, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:i think we need to start eliming in the no room claim pool


we can probly hit bad guys

and if they're townies we were never going to win this game

VOTE: Reck

my tolerance for gamethrowing is gone

In post 1185, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:if reck flips red here it proves our no-elim plan can probly win the game

In post 1138, OutWorldER wrote:

Spoiler: Quote

In post 1127, Taly wrote:

Haschel Cedricson wrote:Taly is by far my strongest townread for being the person who is visibly doing the most scumhunting.

This wasn't on the list of things I think I'd read upon my lazy half-ass skim But I'll take it.

Flea/OWER/Murder

, you all have very different vibes than in https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=83&t=84987 where I was scum hydra with

Ali

wolfing on all of you townies

flea

, you are much more upfront with POV, kind of hard to navigate and get to the meat of your posting, and you take so much initiative here that I don't know how genuine that is.

OWER

, your dog pic is really fucking cute and that probably contributes to the pocket, can you give me an in depth take on

BM/Ali/Pooky

? You are far more active in pushing your ideas than the linked game above.

Murder

, WHERE YOU AT? methinks I skim over you so much that you are an assassin meant to kill us all quietly... but tbh I sympathize, I think I'd be FAR less

"not-on-the-radar"

if people took the time to read me more.

I stand by

Bell/Ali/Pooky/Reck/OWER/Gamma

town

TENTATIVELY

. I want to reread them as well as

BM/Murder/Flea

before I double-down 100%.

If I can make a solid towncore with at LEAST 6-7 people AND find a vote this dayphase, I'd be golden with solving in the future.

DG

;3 I'll vote soon, I never disappoint.

also who is

Blitzo

? i demand everybody who reads this post to say

"

Blitzo

is town/scum/?"

so I can gauge how many wagons this gamestate actually wants to have...

BM's play is far different from what I remember in the game I played with him, where was very active in engaging other people and wasn't really a passive fluff-poster like he is here. Especially given there's a lot of contradictions in his play so far. (Compare 111 to 129, 75 and 153). Other posts like 198 and such ping me.

In post 1188, Akarin wrote:Pooky, why Reck over Haschel?

In post 1179, Titus wrote:Can we move on to no elimination and compliance? I am bored and this feels like an RVS that will last forever.