Mafiascum.net

In post 1150, rousseau wrote:

In post 1147, Infinity 324 wrote:@shiki

i think kyouko was saying that galron's scenario assumed that she was town and it's tmi simply for that reason

if galron had included a scenario where kyouko was scum in the question then i don't think it would've been a problem

i think it's an overuse of tmi

but it was prompted by drippinggoofball's vote of skitter

so asking drippinggoofball about a potential scum!skitter scenario that assumed kyouko was town would be like

'hm, do you really think scum!skitter would do this?'

which does not imply an information slip to me?

and i am having a lot of trouble understanding how it would to someone else

but also i know i am probably doing the thing where i am consumed right now

In post 1224, Roden wrote:I'm sheeping Kyouko because y'all won't fucking stop hyper posting. I can barely attempt to play with how fast the game is going and the best I could do was follow along with my strongest town read.

In post 1164, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:

In post 1160, rousseau wrote:

In post 1155, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:That took a while to write because Rousseau is obfuscating the issue with the formatting and misquoting the actual content of the quotes because it's coming from memory^

now it just looks to me like your point is,

is tmi because 'town' instead of 'town!kyouko'

which, uh, shrug

what's the rest of the reasoning as to why galron is a scums?

shortly thereafter he says he doesn't have a read on me yet, which is in contradiction with him calling me town in his question to DGB. I think this further indicates that calling me town was a slip and he's backtracking to cover it up.
I also haven't seen anything since then to convince me he's townie or solving.
Furthermore, the way he says he "leaned in" to your meme question about the triangle of being annoyed between Tetrina, you, and him, makes me think he's having trouble engaging in general and is "leaning in" to try to force some involvement. Describing it as leaning in reveals that he is aware he is detached, and it feels like something scum would do: Open up about what they're actually feeling in a game to appear genuine and therefore townie.

In post 1234, Galron wrote:

In post 1164, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:

In post 1160, rousseau wrote:

In post 1155, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:That took a while to write because Rousseau is obfuscating the issue with the formatting and misquoting the actual content of the quotes because it's coming from memory^

now it just looks to me like your point is,

is tmi because 'town' instead of 'town!kyouko'

which, uh, shrug

what's the rest of the reasoning as to why galron is a scums?

shortly thereafter he says he doesn't have a read on me yet, which is in contradiction with him calling me town in his question to DGB. I think this further indicates that calling me town was a slip and he's backtracking to cover it up.
I also haven't seen anything since then to convince me he's townie or solving.
Furthermore, the way he says he "leaned in" to your meme question about the triangle of being annoyed between Tetrina, you, and him, makes me think he's having trouble engaging in general and is "leaning in" to try to force some involvement. Describing it as leaning in reveals that he is aware he is detached, and it feels like something scum would do: Open up about what they're actually feeling in a game to appear genuine and therefore townie.

You know when you hear an interview and the interviewed says something snarky about the guest and the guest goes along with it? That's leaning into a bit.

In post 1232, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I will give you my corn cob pipe in exchange for your japanese fan

In post 1170, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 602, DrippingGoofball wrote:Galron, what was the point of that tedious post-by-post Tetrina iso? It was very boring.

In post 1186, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 789, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 788, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I'm a doctor I will keep you safe

Ahem

Counterclaim

VOTE: Pooky

In post 790, DrippingGoofball wrote:Oh were you joking? Nvm

VOTE: Cephrir

this is such a jank play
DGB's counterclaim looked like a joke, but then goes like "oh wait that wasn't serious?"
feelsbadman

In post 1201, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1187, Tetrina wrote:Are you worried about anything?

this could be scum in a supporting role.

In post 1202, Gamma Emerald wrote:DGB once again seems to be flailing in response to pressure

In post 1237, Galron wrote:

In post 1170, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 602, DrippingGoofball wrote:Galron, what was the point of that tedious post-by-post Tetrina iso? It was very boring.

I answered that a couple of times. If you're re reading you'll come across it. I basically made a serious post it of something that didn't start out serious.

In post 1240, Galron wrote:

In post 1202, Gamma Emerald wrote:DGB once again seems to be flailing in response to pressure

Where do you see flailing?

In post 1218, Tetrina wrote:

In post 1214, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1187, Tetrina wrote:Are you worried about anything?

the conversation at this time confused me, was this @ me?

It was at DrippingGoofball and their reply wasn't good, they're desperate or worried about

something

like how they're talking

In post 1243, Galron wrote:

In post 1218, Tetrina wrote:

In post 1214, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1187, Tetrina wrote:Are you worried about anything?

the conversation at this time confused me, was this @ me?

It was at DrippingGoofball and their reply wasn't good, they're desperate or worried about

something

like how they're talking

Okay now I'm thinking I've got to take a look at dgb and gamma. Tetrina I think is pretty solidly town atp so something doesn't track here.

In post 1228, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:VOTE: DGB

In post 1241, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1237, Galron wrote:

In post 1170, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 602, DrippingGoofball wrote:Galron, what was the point of that tedious post-by-post Tetrina iso? It was very boring.

I answered that a couple of times. If you're re reading you'll come across it. I basically made a serious post it of something that didn't start out serious.

I was reacting to DGB's post, you weren't involved