In post 1134, rousseau wrote: In post 1131, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Galron is addressing DGB in response to it voting Skitter.
Galron says, to DGB, does scum!Skitter push town [Kyouko] like this?
I identify this (Galron referring to me as town) feels TMI to me because so far I have felt that Galron viewed me as null or scummy, and that if anything, he should have a negative view of me because he sees the discussion about the callers as distracting.
1.
yeah first you meant not to be there
but asking
2.
do you think scum!skitter does pushes you like this as town?
3.
does not imply that you are town? like you are answering the question for drippinggoofball as 'yes' in order to conclude that
4.
galron was tmiing you as town?
5.
whereas asking 'do you think scum!skitter pushes a wagon likely to fall apart like this?'
6.
to me implies that galron thinks it is not super likely but is asking drippinggoofball for their opinion
In post 1135, rousseau wrote:
7.
and thus if not likely that galron thinks scum!skitter would do this, that implies galron thinks more likely town!skitter, thus not inconsistent with earlier interactions with you
8.
so i am asking why this sort of question means that to you
1. I'm thinking this is a reference to a typo, not sure. If it's important lmk.
2. This is the exact question that was asked, with the green inserted by me for clarity, because the wording in your post is unclear:
In post 295, Galron wrote:
Does a scum!Skitter spend this much effort trying to build a case on town
[Kyouko]
on day 1 of a phase when it's likely any wagon there is likely to break up?
3. I am the player that Skitter was spending effort in trying to build a case on, so yes, it does imply that I am town. If DGB had answered yes, it would follow that DGB also concedes that I am town for the purposes of answering the question. I have drawn no conclusions about anyone, including DGB, from a made-up answer to this question. I
have
drawn conlcusions about Galron based on the wording he used in his own question. He chose those words.
4. Galron
is
slipping that he thinks I am town here. If he were not, he would have worded the question differently.
5. <nothing to respond to>
6. I don't disagree with your conclusion here. This, however, has nothing to do with Galron TMIing me as town. If he was posing the question as though I were town, he would have said "town!Kyouko", instead of "town", because he did use "scum!Skitter" as a hypothetical.
7. Galron's read on skitter is not what is inconsistent. What is inconsistent is that he sees the discussions about the callers as a distraction, but even though I have been very focused on the callers, he slips that I am town, when he hasn't mentioned anything of the sort before. In fact, later on, when I further clarify that the inconsistency on me is related to my focus on the callers, he claims he has no read on me yet, but he does have a view on me:
In post 497, Galron wrote: In post 453, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Galron I think should have a different view of me based on his stance around the communications from the callers. He said they're a distraction and town should not abide a distraction taking hold of the thread
What is my view of you? I'm not even sure I've got a read on you yet, but I do have a view. I'll tell you about it after you tell me what you think it is.
I believe the initial communications were a distraction, yes, put there for color. Whether the subsequent ones are relevant, no idea yet.
8. Apples and oranges. My read on Galron is not related to "this sort of question" in the sense you seem to think it is. The only relation it has to that question is that in the wording of that question, Galron TMIs that I am town.
