Page 54 of 109

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 5:21 pm
by fferyllt
well...he flounced and actually left, it seems.

When I'm town with a bandwagon on me, even if I give up on shaking the lynch I still have a town win as my goal. I work to the bitter end trying to refine my reads and leave the best cases I can.

Neither of them are doing that.

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 5:27 pm
by goodmorning
I wouldn't expect that sort of thing from AA9 anyway, but the type of player Fe is I would think wouldn't just say "I'm tired of it and I don't wanna give reads or reasons."

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 5:28 pm
by goodmorning
(unless he was Scum)

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 5:33 pm
by GuyInFreezer
Then what kind of response would you expect from him?

Also CAKE

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 5:36 pm
by goodmorning
Something like what ff said: "When I'm town with a bandwagon on me, even if I give up on shaking the lynch I still have a town win as my goal. I work to the bitter end trying to refine my reads and leave the best cases I can." I think Town!Fe would be likely to do that rather than basically tell everyone to fuck off.

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 5:46 pm
by fferyllt
All these damn acronyms. What does this one mean?

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 5:48 pm
by goodmorning
It means it's his birthday.

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 5:50 pm
by fferyllt
literally laughed out loud.

Happy Birthday!

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 6:51 pm
by VisceraEyes
I'm sorry to see AA and Eye go out that way but meh. Scum can never defeat us anyway.

Also drunkpost XD

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 8:52 pm
by fferyllt
In post 1329, goodmorning wrote:Something like what ff said: "When I'm town with a bandwagon on me, even if I give up on shaking the lynch I still have a town win as my goal. I work to the bitter end trying to refine my reads and leave the best cases I can." I think Town!Fe would be likely to do that rather than basically tell everyone to fuck off.
Ok, so from the quality of the flounces you think this could be town- AA9? And you kind of extrapolate into unseen territory that town-FE wouldn't have given up in quite this way?

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 2:47 am
by goodmorning
Yes and based on the quality of his play, yes.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 2:54 am
by fferyllt
In post 1335, goodmorning wrote:Yes and based on the quality of his play, yes.
The sort of shut-down he has done fits a conservative scum motivation. It minimizes the associative trails.

The sort of shut-down AA has done fits a more gambit-driven scum motivation. It lays down gazilions of associative trails and increases WIFOM.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 3:27 am
by goodmorning
That's her playstyle as any alignment pretty much though. She's definitely got me in flip-flop mode.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 4:01 am
by fferyllt
Z7 you keep popping in here. What are your thoughts about this?

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 4:30 am
by Z7-852
I have been away for few days and basically not much interesting have happened. I like how people have opened up about their reads. This helps to figure players out better. Goodmorning in particularly haven't given complete thoughts in long time so it eases my mind when she finally does (#1287). Don't know why everyone is ranking VisceraEyes to be a townie, but it's more likely that I'am wrong than rest of you (fferyllt and GuyInFreezer). These two players are at least my strongest town reads at the moment.

Game really started moving when GuyInFreezer put ArcAngel9 to L-1. Problem here is that nobody is trying to derail this bandwagon. That means even if we hit a scum we don't get much information about other scum. To me ArcAngel9 reactions (#1315) seem to vulgar to be lies. Ether that or she is a really good actress. Well we will have much better ground to start playing this game after the night.

Currently I don't have time to write long posts. I'am V/LA as I said earlier but I still try to catch up as much as I can.

Scumometer (tm)
fferyllt < GuyInFreezer < Deras < Mac < Eye urn < ArcAngel9 < goodmorning < VisceraEyes

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 4:38 am
by fferyllt
In post 1339, Z7-852 wrote:Problem here is that nobody is trying to derail this bandwagon
dude, I've been second guessing this wagon since the minute I put my vote down. :lol:

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 4:55 am
by VisceraEyes
We need to make decision guys. Are you content with nolynch in this situation? I'm not.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:00 am
by fferyllt
Nolynch day 1? No.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:17 am
by goodmorning
As I've said, I'm willing to hammer AA9 this evening but would MUCH prefer an Fe lynch.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:21 am
by goodmorning
So it's not like we're really really in danger of a no lynch.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:24 am
by VisceraEyes
I just see sentiment about AA maybe being town for calling everyone pathetic - I just want to make sure we're all after the same thing.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:30 am
by fferyllt
In post 1345, VisceraEyes wrote:I just see sentiment about AA maybe being town for calling everyone pathetic - I just want to make sure we're all after the same thing.
Not everyone. There were two bandwagoneers missing from her diatribe.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 6:43 am
by VisceraEyes
Are the people missing off-voting or in some other fashion important to her not getting lynched? Because if so then someone just needs to hammer and we'll get this thing going.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 6:46 am
by GuyInFreezer
In post 1346, fferyllt wrote:
In post 1345, VisceraEyes wrote:I just see sentiment about AA maybe being town for calling everyone pathetic - I just want to make sure we're all after the same thing.
Not everyone. There were two bandwagoneers missing from her diatribe.
Hmm?

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 7:06 am
by fferyllt
In post 1348, GuyInFreezer wrote:
In post 1346, fferyllt wrote:
In post 1345, VisceraEyes wrote:I just see sentiment about AA maybe being town for calling everyone pathetic - I just want to make sure we're all after the same thing.
Not everyone. There were two bandwagoneers missing from her diatribe.
Hmm?
Eye and VE IIRC.