Mafiascum.net

In post 1349, Enchant wrote:Well. Yes?

In post 1351, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1349, Enchant wrote:Well. Yes?

Okay.
Why am I scummier than MM to you?

In post 1351, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1349, Enchant wrote:Well. Yes?

Okay.
Why am I scummier than MM to you?

In post 1244, Miss Midnight wrote:Could someone who was scum... make this??

In post 1353, Enchant wrote:

In post 1351, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1349, Enchant wrote:Well. Yes?

Okay.
Why am I scummier than MM to you?

Hard to explain.

I don't think mafia makes something like this:

In post 1244, Miss Midnight wrote:Could someone who was scum... make this??

In post 1253, Harvey and Haley wrote:

In post 1240, the worst wrote:

In post 1234, Flea The Magician wrote:My big issue with Harvey and Haley rn is WIM telling. Haley being absent is probably the biggest red flag for me here, especially if I assume it's Anya based on Auro's previous interactions with them, and having played with them being absent scum.

Haley is always low pressure D1 and I don't think he's been playing mafia lately. I'm more focused on what Harvey is doing rather than literal absence.

pedit: VOTE: gamma emerald

Why is this pedit aligned to the right? I wasn't able to spot it easily.

VOTE: Gamma Emerald

-Harvey

In post 1259, Titus wrote:

In post 1044, ManateeGal wrote:if enough people arent reading it the same way i am then im ready to admit my interpretation is wrong

and
VOTE: Enchant

Town.

In post 1288, House wrote:

In post 1259, Titus wrote:

In post 1044, ManateeGal wrote:if enough people arent reading it the same way i am then im ready to admit my interpretation is wrong

and
VOTE: Enchant

Town.

Hard disagree.

She used it as an excuse to hop off me because my wagon dissipated.

In post 1301, House wrote:

In post 1298, Miss Midnight wrote:I think you're overstating or overthinking your own importance/ the importance of events surrounding you when it comes to the thread at large. I think that this is probably town indicative.

No. What's important is the notice behind actions.

If she had jumped off you like that after pushing you from your first post in the game, I'd say the same thing.

In post 1359, the worst wrote:

In post 1288, House wrote:

In post 1259, Titus wrote:

In post 1044, ManateeGal wrote:if enough people arent reading it the same way i am then im ready to admit my interpretation is wrong

and
VOTE: Enchant

Town.

Hard disagree.

She used it as an excuse to hop off me because my wagon dissipated.

.. after enchant was a popular wagon, but while enchant is still low hanging fruit?

I don't think that's a particularly intuitive move for scum there unless they're trying to look scummy. :p

In post 1362, Flea The Magician wrote:Themes memes are worrying.

In post 1326, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Idk

Not really feeling either the Gamma or the Enchant wagon

In post 1364, the worst wrote:

In post 1326, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Idk

Not really feeling either the Gamma or the Enchant wagon

don't feel bad for this, stock in the enchant wagon is tanking and you're in a good spot

In post 1313, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1311, Gamma Emerald wrote:okay, but it feels like she's putting more emphasis on the gamma!scum read than the thor!scum read

and if you don't get why I think that's scummy, see below

In post 1304, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1303, Miss Midnight wrote:

In post 1299, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1296, Miss Midnight wrote:I'm not sure I see the relevance. I don't think that everything scum does has to be part of some scum plot or agenda. Think that this may have just been a not really thought through vote indicative of the underlying mindset, like I said.

what alignment do you think scum!Thor would be more willing to hop on for bad reasons?

Why does it matter? If you're trying to argue that me thinking this should lead to me believing that you're more likely to be town, I'm not so arrogant as to be unable to consider different worlds in which I may not be right. I can scumread Thor but consider a world in which he's town but you're scum. And vice versa. Not all of your scumreads need to be fit together as partners at all times without any flips whatsoever, that would be a wildly ineffective way to play the game.

it feels more like you're trying to skirt around the chance I'm town because I'm the juicy miselim wagon rn

In post 1231, Datisi wrote:

vote count 1.17

with 14 votes in play, it takes 8 to make a decision. day 1 ends in (expired on 2021-09-03 17:20:00).

yeet

Enchant [4]:

Bee, Titus, PenguinPower, ManateeGal

Miss Midnight [4]:

Thor Ragnarok, Cat Scratch Fever, Harvey and Haley, the worst

Harvey and Haley [2]:

Flea The Magician, Gamma Emerald

Thor Ragnarok [1]:

Miss Midnight

Cat Scratch Fever [1]:

Enchant

ManateeGal [1]:

House

not voting [1]:

Something_Smart

mod notes

~ dual mod iso

flavour

In post 1239, Miss Midnight wrote:I'm caught up.

VOTE: Gamma Emerald

In post 1240, the worst wrote:

In post 1234, Flea The Magician wrote:My big issue with Harvey and Haley rn is WIM telling. Haley being absent is probably the biggest red flag for me here, especially if I assume it's Anya based on Auro's previous interactions with them, and having played with them being absent scum.

Haley is always low pressure D1 and I don't think he's been playing mafia lately. I'm more focused on what Harvey is doing rather than literal absence.

pedit: VOTE: gamma emerald

In post 1320, Flea The Magician wrote:

In post 937, Flea The Magician wrote:

In post 911, Bee wrote:

In post 899, Flea The Magician wrote:

In post 885, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 880, Flea The Magician wrote:OK this is absolutely busywork and some weird ass BS.

Do you think it's scummy?

I'm starting to lean that way.

I love mech spec, and if you look at the style of games I play I tend to go for mech heavy or bastard games. Looking at the games I've run (all 2 of them - still need an outside reviewer for the second) you can see I love mech weirdness.

If you want me to get down and dirty in the mech here, I can and I will, but the conclsion is always going to be the same. The human element alone here is enough to throw the spec out of the window.

I can tell you what my options were that I was going to choose from, and few people will actually believe me because of how I approach these games.

I was looking at PGO, Vengeful and Universial Backup. I'm not going to say what I actually selected but I was looking at those as I sent my number in.

Wait what does your role and what you wanted have anything to do with this, like, offhandedly bringing this up?

Your vote on Thor was :/ to me because I see him as you in Yin and Yang where everyone jumped on you for not playing the game the same way. What differences do you see in your play there and what’s happening now?

Bringing it up to give evidence of the human element, because frankly I ain't a normal human. You look at the list, and think about what you would pick, then compare to what I'd narrowed my options to - bearing in mind even if I was the first to pick, that would be my pool.

I haven't voted for Thor either, my vote is an RVS vote that stuck.
The difference in mechanical information available is the difference here. I was using in-game mechanics as I believed them at the time. Thor has gone as far as the game setup is not randomised but arbitrarily picked, and now as far as pagetop counts. The setup rand I can forgive, I saw that as a legitimate mistake. If it turns out I know the player behind the alt, that could change. Going on pagetops and out of game mechanics is considerably different to what I was doing.

In post 941, Bee wrote:I’ll try to respond later Flea I need to focus on work for a bit.

Just bringing this back, because I want to know what the response is

In post 1366, Bee wrote:I don't get it still even while reading what MM's saying about you. It doesn't feel like she's skirting around it but just admitting that it might not be right or fit perfectly together. Which I feel is like... a "good faith" approach because she's willing to admit it might not be right and the implication in that is that you could prove her wrong and she wouldn't still try to yeet you.

In post 1371, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1366, Bee wrote:I don't get it still even while reading what MM's saying about you. It doesn't feel like she's skirting around it but just admitting that it might not be right or fit perfectly together. Which I feel is like... a "good faith" approach because she's willing to admit it might not be right and the implication in that is that you could prove her wrong and she wouldn't still try to yeet you.

That would be a good faith approach if it was being applied without bias, which it definitely isn’t

In post 1331, House wrote:

In post 1330, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:What's troubling about it?

I wouldn't expect 2 of my scumreads to make up half of a wagon if I'm right.