Mafiascum.net

Although isnt tunnel vision focusing on one player and only one player, igonoring the rest. I think what he's doing would be more akin to confirmation bias than tunnel vision (or are they synonims?)

In post 1369, CooLDoG wrote:and not taking into account a wide range of players

Ah nvm I forgot this.
Eh, idk.

In post 1374, Quick wrote:

In post 1364, Persivul wrote:p-edit: Quick, can you also explain the porkens case to me?

There is no case on Pokins. People just don't like him. You can praise FB for that brilliant idea.

But that's, like, not true though.

In post 1368, Porkens wrote:

In post 1361, Quick wrote:

In post 1359, Porkens wrote:Why are you his lawyer?

Because the case against him is fucking retarded.

Lemme ask you this. Are his posts excusably bad or do they add value from a town perspective?

They add value. I don't think his content is awful. It was just his catch up. I am waiting to see what he does because if he is the kind of player I think he is, he could very well be a great asset to Town. Despite his less than stellar case on Norwegian, Norwegian's reaction to it sucks balls and is little more than an OMGUS because he wants to be popular.

God, I think Nor is right about quick. Goddamn it.

VOTE: quick

In post 1377, CooLDoG wrote:

In post 1374, Quick wrote:

In post 1364, Persivul wrote:p-edit: Quick, can you also explain the porkens case to me?

There is no case on Pokins. People just don't like him. You can praise FB for that brilliant idea.

But that's, like, not true though.

Okay..

In post 1378, Quick wrote:

In post 1368, Porkens wrote:

In post 1361, Quick wrote:

In post 1359, Porkens wrote:Why are you his lawyer?

Because the case against him is fucking retarded.

Lemme ask you this. Are his posts excusably bad or do they add value from a town perspective?

They add value. I don't think his content is awful. It was just his catch up. I am waiting to see what he does because if he is the kind of player I think he is, he could very well be a great asset to Town. Despite his less than stellar case on Norwegian, Norwegian's reaction to it sucks balls and is little more than an OMGUS because he wants to be popular.

There’s no need to be such a dick just because i call you out for being a tryhard.

In post 1379, CooLDoG wrote:God, I think Nor is right about quick. Goddamn it.

VOTE: quick

I didn't think you could read me so well based on gut. I tried...

/s

In post 1367, Sakura Hana wrote:The case on Porkens is that he called me out for not scumhunting, and kept "attacking" me (put into quote marks for a reason and you'll see why soon), and so I decide to OMGUS vote him, and he counters with "I never voted you nor scumread you". And some awkward vote patterns.

That's as far as I understand it.

“Never called you scummy”

In post 1381, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 1378, Quick wrote:

In post 1368, Porkens wrote:

In post 1361, Quick wrote:

In post 1359, Porkens wrote:Why are you his lawyer?

Because the case against him is fucking retarded.

Lemme ask you this. Are his posts excusably bad or do they add value from a town perspective?

They add value. I don't think his content is awful. It was just his catch up. I am waiting to see what he does because if he is the kind of player I think he is, he could very well be a great asset to Town. Despite his less than stellar case on Norwegian, Norwegian's reaction to it sucks balls and is little more than an OMGUS because he wants to be popular.

There’s no need to be such a dick just because i call you out for being a tryhard.

I have not even made a case yet.

Part of the problem is that you defend people and still haven't made a case.

In post 1374, Quick wrote:There is no case on Pokins. People just don't like him. You can praise FB for that brilliant idea.

Yeah, I already saw that. More disturbing IMO is nopower sheeping fire. Any thoughts on nopower, particularly the relationship with fire?

In post 1383, Porkens wrote:

In post 1367, Sakura Hana wrote:The case on Porkens is that he called me out for not scumhunting, and kept "attacking" me (put into quote marks for a reason and you'll see why soon), and so I decide to OMGUS vote him, and he counters with "I never voted you nor scumread you". And some awkward vote patterns.

That's as far as I understand it.

“Never called you scummy”

DETAILS.
But the point is understandable enough.

This had nothing to do with a case. Case me all you want. I was referring to your less than kind "wants to be popular" comment.

In post 1030, Quick wrote:Actually?

VOTE: Farkran

Your vote is basically on the guy who replaced in and is catching up.

In post 1010, Farkran wrote:Drewsta should claim now

I this the reason for the vote, quick?

In post 1375, Sakura Hana wrote:Although isnt tunnel vision focusing on one player and only one player, igonoring the rest. I think what he's doing would be more akin to confirmation bias than tunnel vision (or are they synonims?)

You'll get differences of opinion, but the wiki entry on tunneling just redirects to confirmation bias.

Note the true confirmation bias is necessarily coming from town. Scum can't confbias themselves into something they already know for certain.

In post 1386, Persivul wrote:

In post 1374, Quick wrote:There is no case on Pokins. People just don't like him. You can praise FB for that brilliant idea.

Yeah, I already saw that. More disturbing IMO is nopower sheeping fire. Any thoughts on nopower, particularly the relationship with fire?

Not a fucking clue, but it probably has something to do with NPOM's main and the fact that [Redacted] if NPOM is Scum here.

In post 1390, CooLDoG wrote:

In post 1010, Farkran wrote:Drewsta should claim now

I this the reason for the vote, quick?

Yes.

In post 1386, Persivul wrote:

In post 1374, Quick wrote:There is no case on Pokins. People just don't like him. You can praise FB for that brilliant idea.

Yeah, I already saw that. More disturbing IMO is nopower sheeping fire. Any thoughts on nopower, particularly the relationship with fire?

Yeah, he doesn't post content, and sheeping fire is kinda the worse sheep you could make. I don't understand why scum or town would sheep him. Maybe his gut reads are legendary????

In post 1093, Porkens wrote:Keys unlock locks

VOTE: unvote

VOTE: norweeganbouee

This is a pretty bad vote tbh.

@quick, then why don't you talk about him for pages after the vote?

In post 1395, CooLDoG wrote:

In post 1093, Porkens wrote:Keys unlock locks

VOTE: unvote

VOTE: norweeganbouee

This is a pretty bad vote tbh.

@quick, then why don't you talk about him for pages after the vote?

Porky can take care of himself.

Yeah that one isn’t great.

In post 1115, Porkens wrote:Don’t worry too much loan. Here, let’s just take a step back to where we were

VOTE: unvote
VOTE: drew

His next post is this. We never get a justification for Nor, from what I can tell.

In post 1394, CooLDoG wrote:Maybe his gut reads are legendary????

Fire is a very strong player as town, he just, doesnt like playing like most people do, I've played with his alt where he actually plays normally and he's actually pretty good, but he generally plays the way he plays coz it's more fun.

That is if i recall correctly.