Mafiascum.net

In post 1359, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Someone who just replaced in and has no content, so it has to be a read on my predecessor, which you have yet to explain.

In post 1334, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 1223, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:

In post 1221, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 1219, House wrote:

In post 1216, Dwlee99 wrote:I will be more engaged when I feel more strongly about things. Right now I don't even feel completely solid forming a poe so I'm just kinda trudging along

C'mon dwlee, perk up.

VOTE: dwlee

Too early to be demoralized.

No

In post 1222, Dwlee99 wrote:It isn't demoralized btw, it's just a lack of strong feels

Feeling a little down that your easy elimination for later got replaced with someone notoriously difficult to murder?

I get it, it's okay. The scum QT must be really quiet for you to be this sad out here though.

This one actually bad though (I just had to post that image)

In post 1370, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:so I need to ask in what way are my posts condescending?

In post 1379, Dannflor wrote:I’m sorry to pile on the questions here, but I have to ask, why did you assume this initial post by LLD was like 100% serious? I’m not saying it wasn’t but I don’t think that would’ve been my first reaction

In post 1224, Dwlee99 wrote:Gamma? Difficult to murder?

In post 1381, unwnd wrote:I think you should compile your evidence instead of tacking it on through practice

If your conviction is strong enough on LLD, I'm willing to listen. I just don't know if I believe it given how circumstantial it is?

In post 1384, the worst wrote:

In post 1224, Dwlee99 wrote:Gamma? Difficult to murder?

is this a slip???

In post 1383, Dannflor wrote:I’m not sure that litigating this specific point is the best use of either of your time at the moment

In post 1385, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 1381, unwnd wrote:I think you should compile your evidence instead of tacking it on through practice

If your conviction is strong enough on LLD, I'm willing to listen. I just don't know if I believe it given how circumstantial it is?

My evidence is that every single time someone pushes me in this way they've been scum. Pooky in Dogs v Cats, Menalque in Dead Silence, Guillotina in MT 2225, goats in white flag, probably others I'm forgetting.

In post 1382, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 1379, Dannflor wrote:I’m sorry to pile on the questions here, but I have to ask, why did you assume this initial post by LLD was like 100% serious? I’m not saying it wasn’t but I don’t think that would’ve been my first reaction

I don't think it comes across as a joke at all. The tone is completely serious

In post 1388, Dwlee99 wrote:I mean I'm not a meta person but this is also exactly what LLD did in Yggdrasil to Murdercat while he protested that she was obviously scum and we didn't believe him cause she had bussed day one

In post 1385, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 1381, unwnd wrote:I think you should compile your evidence instead of tacking it on through practice

If your conviction is strong enough on LLD, I'm willing to listen. I just don't know if I believe it given how circumstantial it is?

My evidence is that every single time someone pushes me in this way they've been scum. Pooky in Dogs v Cats, Menalque in Dead Silence, Guillotina in MT 2225, goats in white flag, probably others I'm forgetting.

In post 1390, Dannflor wrote:

In post 1382, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 1379, Dannflor wrote:I’m sorry to pile on the questions here, but I have to ask, why did you assume this initial post by LLD was like 100% serious? I’m not saying it wasn’t but I don’t think that would’ve been my first reaction

I don't think it comes across as a joke at all. The tone is completely serious

Ehhhh I don’t mean a joke necessarily

Just like I feel there is definitely some hyperbole here that she is using to poke at you, she didn’t assume you were 100% scum off those two posts as she has self admitted

I guess I’m just struggling to see what your initial problem was because to me it just reads like she’s poking at you

In post 1387, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:

In post 1383, Dannflor wrote:I’m not sure that litigating this specific point is the best use of either of your time at the moment

I happen to agree.

What's your read on Dwlee? Because at this point, I'm seeing a lot of possible faked anger, starting from the initial fuck off to now, that I think might be AtE deflection.

In post 1392, unwnd wrote:

In post 1385, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 1381, unwnd wrote:I think you should compile your evidence instead of tacking it on through practice

If your conviction is strong enough on LLD, I'm willing to listen. I just don't know if I believe it given how circumstantial it is?

My evidence is that every single time someone pushes me in this way they've been scum. Pooky in Dogs v Cats, Menalque in Dead Silence, Guillotina in MT 2225, goats in white flag, probably others I'm forgetting.

Well for Dogs v Cats, you were scum too

Wasn't your read before LLD though?

In post 1395, Dwlee99 wrote:That aggressive poking is scummy. That's the entire point. And notice how she is using this push on me to try to reach out into the rest of the game. It's tunnel -> interact by asking opinions on me. It's an inorganic way to get engaged because it's focusing on a specific spot to generate content on cause it's much easier to just post about one person than 12.

MURDERCAT wrote:

In post 5150, Chara wrote:so wait, where is your scum LLD read from if not from thinking she was bussing?

My LLD read developed well before that and comes from the fact that LLD hasn't once given me the benefit of the doubt except for one moment with morph that I read as very fake. LLD has continued to push me in a way that I find very opportunistic, and her read on me only started when I revealed that I was scum reading LLD. In other words, if I'm the only townie that thinks that scum LLD is scum I am a good target to push and she has continued to push me with no deeper thought behind whether she believes she is correct.