Nazgul (2) - CoolBot, Glork , Ibaesha
Not voting (2) - Beaker, PJ
SIX TO LYNCH!
Pointing out Cropcircles’ “lurking”…Nazgul wrote:I noticed Cropcircles posting in another thread in the forum today, but still nothing here. Looks like an attempt to lurk to me.
This in response to Coolbot’sNazgul wrote:your continued defence of cropcircles is duely noted... My vote stays on cropcircles.
Asking Coolbot to vote for Cropcircles… funny how you find him suspicious today after he had first refused to vote for Cropcircles...Nazgul wrote:So, Coolbot, are you now going to pressurize your buddy cropcircles into claiming? or do you have double standards?
Again, showing a willingness to lynch Cropcircles.Nazgul wrote:Anyway, I'm sticking to my vote. People who vote for themselves in a situation like this can hardly be on our side.
So now the voters on Cropcircles are suspect, and you claim innocence. You then ask Coolbot what the rush is: I think that is entirely stupid. You push for Cropcircles the entire day, and then when somebody lays down the hammer (after actually waiting for a claim, so the worst we could possibly do was a lynch a townie anyways) you criticize the people who voted for the same person you pushed.Nazgul wrote:In his [Fritzler’s] place, I would look first at the other Cropcircles voters: Nazgul, raj, pwnz, and Coolbot. So it seems a reasonable bet that it is one of these. I know I'm innocent, but of course I should be in the list of suspects.
I'm inclined to vote Coolbot, because of his reasoning in post 151 - why the rush?
How else would you interpret this than that the role blocker Fritzler blocked on of his attackers?elvis_knits wrote: Fritzler was having a sweet time when one of them tried to chop his balls off. Fritzler wasn’t about to fall for that one again, so he quickly fought off the attack.
He was not so lucky with the second attack. Even though he was a baller and totally kicked ass, he still got his face eaten off.
WTF are you talking about? My exact words, underlined for convenience, were "In his place, I would look first at the other Cropcircles voters:petroleumjelly wrote:Secondly, your taking yourself out of the Cropcircles lynchers (after so heavily pursuing it yesterday) is disturbing. There is no way you can dissociate yourself from it at this point.
You have me there. In contrast to all other players who have performed brilliantly, pointed out scum and led town to victory.Nazgul, you have not contributed very much to this game other than the pushing and eventual lynching of an innocent...
Fine, I can see how you might interpret that as Fritzler being able to role-block one of his attackers. I still disagree. I have rarely seen Mods come out and show a role-blocking like this: most Mods, when dealing with a double-kill, show the attacked as surviving a first attack but succumbing to the second. For example, please look at Survivor Mafia, where on Night One, Harry Potter (Jeff Varner) "survived" an attack from a machete only to have his head hacked off. Most Mods simply allow the player to "survive" in order to show that the player was attacked twice. If Fritzler had correctly role-blocked the "ball-cutter", I am positive that we never would have seen a double attempt on Fritzler's life.Elvis_Knits wrote:Fritzler was having a sweet time when one of them tried to chop his balls off. Fritzler wasn’t about to fall for that one again, so he quickly fought off the attack.
He was not so lucky with the second attack. Even though he was a baller and totally kicked ass, he still got his face eaten off.
Is not helpful whatsoever. You are not responding, but instead leaving wry comments about the rest of the town.Nazgul wrote:You have me there. In contrast to all other players who have performed brilliantly, pointed out scum and led town to victory.
i agree. but this is elvis first game so it will be hard to compare with other modding attempts.petroleumjelly wrote:Most Mods simply allow the player to "survive" in order to show that the player was attacked twice. If Fritzler had correctly role-blocked the "ball-cutter", I am positive that we never would have seen a double attempt on Fritzler's life.
Hmmm? Sharp contrast from your behavior yesterday...ibaesha wrote:Checking in.
I won't be voting for PJ today. Even if he's wrong.
since the day started an was already moving i still think that making a random vote at that stage of the game was counter productive to finding scum.Glork wrote:You voted him because he voted for Nazgul -- which, considering it was his first post/vote, and we had just started Page 2, was not necessarily expected to be completely serious/legit in nature. You overlooked this fact, whether intentionally or naively. Either way, you should have recognized this fact and backed off, and you didn't.