Mafiascum.net

I thought it was pretty clear.

I don't know you dude, Im not gonna meta-search your play.

The former, obvs.

Any posts in particular?

In post 134, Azuresky wrote: I like the use of the word "apathy" used in this. Its the same thing Aaron said earlier in regards to me. To me, it sounds like an excuse for elements to hop on. Anyone else, or am I reaching?

Nope I noticed it too. That's why I straight up asked him why he was sheeping me.

Elements wrote:

In post 135, Azuresky wrote:I don't think Elements had a real reason of voting me (per 108 and 116) and just copied Aarons reasoning (Bolded in 110 and 121)

My reasoning is Aaron's reasoning.

I agree with him. After I spelt his name wrong I wanted to change my vote and he gave a reasonable argument for voting you so I checked your ISO and agreed with him. I have effectively said I'm sheeping him on this so I don't see why it's such a big problem to you.

Did somebody clone me at some point in my life and I'm only just now being made aware of it? Because that's the only reason I can think of for this line.

I'm struggling to see the problem here. I sheeped Aaron and voted Azure because I agree with his reasoning.

Seems pretty simple to me.

Let me explain this to you as if you are 5.

I think you are scum.

That means I believe you know who is scum and who is town.

That means your reads will be manufactured because you KNOW who is town and who is scum.

You are sheeping Aaron based on his reasoning and only his. Nothing of your own opinion. Just Aarons because you KNOW who is scum and who is town.

Before you even mentioned Aaron, you voted me based on my ISO, which at the time had little besides a typo and some rvs reads.

You refused to give a decent reason WHY you THINK I am scum. Just saying ISO is vauge enough for people to be like "ok"

Since I believe you are scum, I believe you dont have a real reason to vote me, hence why your reasoning = Aaron.

In post 104, Elements wrote:

In post 103, AaronFrost wrote:I'll place my vote on someone who I think has a decent chance of being scum

VOTE: Azuresky

Why do you think they have a decent chance of being scum?

In post 108, Elements wrote:Yea , I just ISO'd azuresky I think my vote is better on them.
VOTE: Azuresky

Better yet, Aaron doesnt even answer between these two posts.

So, I intend to believe you were going to vote me anyways regardless of Aarons reasoning.

I ask again:

In post 126, NotMySpamAccount wrote:ok azuresky's entire iso is bad. my page 5 solve is reaper/azu.

Actually that question goes for Spam too:

What did you see in my ISO that screams scum? Or are you just blindly following aaron?

Ok in summary:

Aaron is Voting me for actual reasons for him to believe I am Scum.
Elements is sheeping Aaron
Spam says ISO
Tchill is being a salty bitch.

If you think this is town-motivated, I welcome someone to hammer.

In post 134, Azuresky wrote:I'm not voting Reaper for his spot on the wagon. There's only 9 people in this game, i doubt he know elements was L-1. His vote still looks bad regardless.

why are you voting reaper then ?

meh tchill is kinda scummy

i think azure has a townie-ish reaction to getting wagoned (specifically 141 and 144)

elements are you usually this antagonistic?

In post 105, skitter30 wrote:

In post 73, Elements wrote:

In post 72, skitter30 wrote:Elements i feel like ur searching for a wagon

In post 65, Elements wrote:We should probably start another wagon. Reaper or Hectic?

I don't know where you got that idea from

Y are u doing this tho ?

also did u answer this ?

In post 160, skitter30 wrote:meh tchill is kinda scummy

i think azure has a townie-ish reaction to getting wagoned (specifically 141 and 144)

To create a tchill you add a pinch of scummy, a dash of reaction testing and then you lightly sprinkle salt of the bitch variety... Apparently. I'm just reading the ingredients.

In post 161, skitter30 wrote:elements are you usually this antagonistic?

I feel like this is just his style. Probably bumps heads with a lot of people. He's also made it abundantly clear he's OK with an azure lynch this early.

In post 103, AaronFrost wrote:I'll place my vote on someone who I think has a decent chance of being scum

VOTE: Azuresky

Also the only reason I see frost voting azure is a reaction test. So that's actual reason?....and it's OK as long as you loudly proclaim that's the reason right?

2 wagons at L-1 before page 8. Doesn't surprise me that neither has went through, I highly doubt this one does. Other than frost azure can't pinpoint a reason for any vote. Can't really look too much into RVS votes imo, I mean I don't think either wagon has had good reason tbh because reapers and azures blew up for little to no reason.

In post 156, Azuresky wrote:

What did you see in my ISO that screams scum? Or are you just blindly following aaron?

At no point have I said I think you are scum.

In post 155, Azuresky wrote:That means I believe you know who is scum and who is town.
That means your reads will be manufactured because you KNOW who is town and who is scum.

Ah, I missed this part in your logic. Now it makes sense.

In post 161, skitter30 wrote:elements are you usually this antagonistic?

Good question. My game style has changed a lot I think in my last few games. I haven't claimed SK yet so Hectic will be relieved.



See you all Thursday evening!

In post 157, Azuresky wrote:

In post 126, NotMySpamAccount wrote:ok azuresky's entire iso is bad. my page 5 solve is reaper/azu.

Actually that question goes for Spam too:

What did you see in my ISO that screams scum? Or are you just blindly following aaron?

The tone is horrendous throughout. It's gotten a little better, so I might switch back to reaper, but I still like my vote here.

In post 168, Elements wrote:

In post 156, Azuresky wrote:

What did you see in my ISO that screams scum? Or are you just blindly following aaron?

At no point have I said I think you are scum.

Then why are you voting for her?

In post 170, AaronFrost wrote:

In post 168, Elements wrote:

In post 156, Azuresky wrote:

What did you see in my ISO that screams scum? Or are you just blindly following aaron?

At no point have I said I think you are scum.

Then why are you voting for her?

I'm not town reading her.

In post 164, Tchill13 wrote:

In post 161, skitter30 wrote:elements are you usually this antagonistic?

I feel like this is just his style. Probably bumps heads with a lot of people. He's also made it abundantly clear he's OK with an azure lynch this early.

I'm asking cuz the last time i played with (town!)him he felt very different and much more chilled out and less like actively going after things

In post 165, Tchill13 wrote:

In post 103, AaronFrost wrote:I'll place my vote on someone who I think has a decent chance of being scum

VOTE: Azuresky

Also the only reason I see frost voting azure is a reaction test. So that's actual reason?....and it's OK as long as you loudly proclaim that's the reason right?

It's p apparent that this isnt the only reason he's voting him

In post 168, Elements wrote:

In post 156, Azuresky wrote:

What did you see in my ISO that screams scum? Or are you just blindly following aaron?

At no point have I said I think you are scum.

In post 155, Azuresky wrote:That means I believe you know who is scum and who is town.
That means your reads will be manufactured because you KNOW who is town and who is scum.

Ah, I missed this part in your logic. Now it makes sense.

In post 161, skitter30 wrote:elements are you usually this antagonistic?

Good question. My game style has changed a lot I think in my last few games. I haven't claimed SK yet so Hectic will be relieved.

Spoiler:

In post 162, skitter30 wrote:

In post 105, skitter30 wrote:

In post 73, Elements wrote:

In post 72, skitter30 wrote:Elements i feel like ur searching for a wagon

In post 65, Elements wrote:We should probably start another wagon. Reaper or Hectic?

I don't know where you got that idea from

Y are u doing this tho ?

also did u answer this ?
Because I'm a sarcastic person.

See you all Thursday evening!

I hate like this entire post