Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2021 11:15 am
i think a stroll is probably a good idea
In post 1521, the worst wrote:you're not using buzzwords imo. your play is just really cliche.
I'm the one under YOUR skin, while you are still insulting me.In post 1523, the worst wrote:i'm perpetually sensitive and i'm trying to decide if i need to take a stroll because you're legitimately under my skin.
Go take a nap.In post 1520, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Nah dude I'm not playing with alignment stuff right now because I've got beef.In post 1515, the worst wrote:noting that's the part of the question that relates the least to your alignmentIn post 1513, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:In what way am I actively unpleasant, or is this another personal crack?In post 1505, the worst wrote:like you're not meaningfully advancing the game. you're loudly virtue signalling that you're here to advance the game. you're called out, and you're actively unpleasant. what's your game here?
I've been trying to be pleasant and not be angry this game, and you're making fun of me and then tone policing me when I tell you I'm upset.
I'm pretty far from okay with you rn, so I'm trying to figure out if this is some personal bullshit or if you're just insensitive.
In post 1091, unwnd wrote:I'll drink your 'worst is bad' tea if MCat doesn't flip Red. I don't think worst's vote is a 'meh my partner is going under' vanity vote
what happened between here and here?
Might be reading too hard into how he put MCat on his readlist but that's what made it half-seriousIn post 1533, Gorkington wrote:In post 1091, unwnd wrote:I'll drink your 'worst is bad' tea if MCat doesn't flip Red. I don't think worst's vote is a 'meh my partner is going under' vanity votewhat happened between here and here?
this isn't rude, but it's ham fisted and i have no regrets calling it out.In post 1333, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Hey guys, want to actually revive this game instead of letting it become a status quo slog?
Let's flash wagon Dwlee for their recent vote and posting. If they don't want to give answers, we can just kill them.
Isn't that the old adage?
this is you being called out on doing the thing you're doing and then doubling down on it because....blinkIn post 1339, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:I poked you about a feeling I was getting from you. It's a weak feeling, but the real goal was to see your reaction.In post 1337, Dwlee99 wrote:You went 0 to 100 on literally nothing
Your reaction was to ask if I meant someone else, when I hadn't even read the game, to the point where Pooky had to point out I obviously meant myself.
Which to me, reads like you were feigning ignorance for a reaction dodge.
That's scummy.
Also, more importantly, what's scummy about going 0 to 100 on a replace in with 0 pressure on me?
oh that's right, because you're the hero this game needs to save it from stagnationIn post 1340, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Cause in my mind, replacing into a slot that isn't dying today and going 0 to 100 to try and generate reads feels like what a town replacement does this close to deadline, where as a scum replacement would probably sit back, read the scum QT, slowly churn the game and help kill a townie today, unless you think all 3 of the top wagons are on scum?
acutely condescending/relevantIn post 1345, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:The argument that I with 0 votes on me and 3 days looming to deadline somehow felt the pressure to respond to you because you said my name is... ludicrous logic that makes no sense with how anyone would play, let alone someone who is as good at scum as you appear to think I am, given your statement about the vote on me.
So in what world does scum make that move to you, Dwlee? What's the scum motivation, if you're calling it scummy?
it's almost like condescending people causes them to become frustrated? spectacular sea lion impersonation thoughIn post 1347, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Why are you upset? I'm not insulting you or attacking you, I'm pointing out flaws in your logic. Will you answer my questions, or is "fuck off" your resignation that you have no answer and I'm pushing at something you didn't expect to get pushed on?
yeah. i fucking called out your play, because you're trying some shit and i find it really obvious. i'm sorry you didn't like the tone of my call-out, but i don't really like your tone either.In post 1480, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:In post 1468, the worst wrote:not only does Aisling have a read and want it to be heard, but MORE IMPORTANTLY they are doing so because they are TOWN and the game is STAGNATING close to DEADLINE and we need more DATA!!! join Aisling in their RIGHTEOUS CAUSE!!!! to save the game from STAGNATION!!!!!!!!You don't get to make the first post and then ask the second one. Like we just had a whole discussion of good faith bad faith, and I feel I've acted in good faith.In post 1470, the worst wrote:(may i please check pronouns for Aisling?)
You going around parading and doing a mockery of me and playing "Dumb guy" to insult my intelligence, then asking my pronouns?
Like, no. Seriously go away.
think you need to direct this via DM
You are caught scumIn post 1522, unwnd wrote:You are jar jar binksIn post 1516, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Anakin wasn't even Darth Vader in Revenge of the Sith.In post 1512, unwnd wrote:Revenge of the sith
and I'm clearly referring to when Obi-Wan let Vader "win" in A New Hope in order to set up the Ultimate Victory.
Your vote is in a curious place, then.In post 1539, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:You are caught scumIn post 1522, unwnd wrote:You are jar jar binksIn post 1516, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Anakin wasn't even Darth Vader in Revenge of the Sith.In post 1512, unwnd wrote:Revenge of the sith
and I'm clearly referring to when Obi-Wan let Vader "win" in A New Hope in order to set up the Ultimate Victory.
You mean there's more than one scum?!In post 1541, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:i am more certain on duckie
This reminds me of the look my buddy gives me every time I crack a dad joke.In post 1545, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:>.>