Page 63 of 96

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2019 2:10 pm
by the worst
In post 1548, LolWagons wrote:
In post 1545, the worst wrote:
In post 1541, LolWagons wrote:
In post 1538, the worst wrote:
In post 1536, LolWagons wrote:He’s not explaining because there is no explanation

Jesus

I like the duck from the time I’ve had with him
but this isn’t town PR play
you don't know me and don't know my TPR play. stop wolfsiding.
I don’t know how many times I have to say I don’t give a shit about 95% of meta but here it is again:

I don’t give a shit about 95% of meta
ah I'm guessing the bolded mystically fits into the 5% of holistic meta you do give a fuck about?

gtfo wolf
Lol

TPR play in general, not for a specific person

Come on
this is applying a broad meta perspective of "what you perceive to come from a tpr" to a player who is a gambit junkie.

you're applying holistic meta and doing it badly.

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2019 2:10 pm
by Nibbui
I'm trying to hear you so that I don't lynch confirmable town power role

you're not helping me

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2019 2:12 pm
by the worst
I'm trying to help. What are you trying to hear?

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2019 2:12 pm
by the worst
I'm not sure what else to do right now. like genuinely. this shit is my wincon

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2019 2:12 pm
by Pink Ball
Could you full claim at least?

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2019 2:12 pm
by LolWagons
Excuse me for applying broad trends in how people play and fitting it into this game instead of just taking the fucking words of people I don’t know the alignment of and blindly following them

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2019 2:14 pm
by the worst
In post 1543, the worst wrote:imo never lynch
{Nancy, Bill, skitter}

probably town
{podoboq, Nibbui}

either way
{sheep}

scum probably
{mastina, lolwagons}

if you want to hammer I can't really be bothered talking you out of it but I still flip TPR
Nancy = probably outside wolfrange even if I don't love the way she got out of it.

Bill = blah blah sound real-times abstract anti-consensus voice of reason good reaction to my reaction test blah blah

skitter = smashing wolfrange on real-time interactions, read of me comes from town!her more than scum!her 100% of the time and I don't think she has the Presence and Energy to push against me this hard as scum.

Nibbui = very very likely town but his frozenness and stiffness rn is making me panic

podoboq = his scumrange would be very good for a recently returned player if he's a wolf but whatever I could be wrong proceed with caution

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2019 2:15 pm
by the worst
In post 1555, LolWagons wrote:Excuse me for applying broad trends in how people play and fitting it into this game instead of just taking the fucking words of people I don’t know the alignment of and blindly following them
i forgib u

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2019 2:15 pm
by Nibbui
Like, I tried to engage with you after your claim and even explained that I could try to strongarm Mastina today if I thought you were reasonable

but instead of engaging me you just went to shade Mastina and call us bad

It really didn't help me in trying to see town you and now I'm even more biased to think that you're scum but let's try it
In post 1552, the worst wrote:I'm trying to help. What are you trying to hear?
In post 1516, Nibbui wrote:
In post 1513, the worst wrote:I'm a lategame confirmable town power role.
I don't think this goes well with you saying that it was "fine to lynch me today" tbh

I mean, you could only be showing false bravado but I think that back there you already were a realistic lynch candidate, I'll check it again

but by "late", how late are we talking about? and it's 100% confirmable?

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2019 2:15 pm
by the worst
In post 1554, Pink Ball wrote:Could you full claim at least?
why would I do that......

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2019 2:16 pm
by LolWagons
You keep shifting the argument out of the game because you can’t address the points people are making in the game with anything except “oops”

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2019 2:16 pm
by the worst
not an innocent child/mod comfirmable but beyond reasonable doubt, yes.

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2019 2:16 pm
by the worst
In post 1560, LolWagons wrote:You keep shifting the argument out of the game because you can’t address the points people are making in the game with anything except “oops”
I'm genujelu not sure what the case against me is

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2019 2:17 pm
by the worst
like the highlight of mastina's case was when she called me scum irl which was funny

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2019 2:17 pm
by LolWagons
In post 1562, the worst wrote:
In post 1560, LolWagons wrote:You keep shifting the argument out of the game because you can’t address the points people are making in the game with anything except “oops”
I'm genujelu not sure what the case against me is
Yes, you do. Skitter laid it out and you said he brought up valid points.

Come. On. Now.

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2019 2:17 pm
by the worst
skitter and sheep think I'm tonally off while both realising they can't toneread me (sheep is by far a worse offender here bc he can do the opposite of toneread me xD)

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2019 2:18 pm
by Nibbui
duck

from what I know of you, and I know it isn't much, your first priority here would be to not get you lynched, ever, even if it meant you being the nightkill, and then after that going to push your scum reads for the lynch today

I'm trying to revalueate you every second but this just doesn't match nicely

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2019 2:18 pm
by the worst
In post 1564, LolWagons wrote:
In post 1562, the worst wrote:
In post 1560, LolWagons wrote:You keep shifting the argument out of the game because you can’t address the points people are making in the game with anything except “oops”
I'm genujelu not sure what the case against me is
Yes, you do. Skitter laid it out and you said he brought up valid points.

Come. On. Now.
she*

that was like a "you don't look like you" case long before a scumcase. as a hater of meta can you please dig it up & give some commentary around what you do and don't support in it?

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2019 2:19 pm
by the worst
In post 1566, Nibbui wrote:duck

from what I know of you, and I know it isn't much, your first priority here would be to not get you lynched, ever, even if it meant you being the nightkill, and then after that going to push your scum reads for the lynch today

I'm trying to revalueate you every second but this just doesn't match nicely
yeah?
wait what?

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2019 2:19 pm
by LolWagons
In post 1567, the worst wrote:
In post 1564, LolWagons wrote:
In post 1562, the worst wrote:
In post 1560, LolWagons wrote:You keep shifting the argument out of the game because you can’t address the points people are making in the game with anything except “oops”
I'm genujelu not sure what the case against me is
Yes, you do. Skitter laid it out and you said he brought up valid points.

Come. On. Now.
she*

that was like a "you don't look like you" case long before a scumcase. as a hater of meta can you please dig it up & give some commentary around what you do and don't support in it?
NO

IT WASNT

HE LITERALLY REFERENCED STUFF
INSIDE
THE GAME

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2019 2:20 pm
by LolWagons
SAhe*

Dammit

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2019 2:22 pm
by LolWagons
In post 1416, skitter30 wrote:
In post 1410, skitter30 wrote:no, i checked before i voted, that's the third

in case you're wondering:
-> things i may have seen as townie from you idk if they're ai anymore
-> you have a bunch of bad posts (pl, nancy intent to hammer, filthy) that feel wrong
-> you feel fake-bravado-y. insinuating that you may be nk'd tonight is ridiculously out of touch with the gamestate given that you aren't obvtown by any means and multiple people are saying they'd like to lynch you; i believe you know that you prob aren't getting nk'd tonight so that felt fake and like an attempt to portray confidence in your towniness when you're not being percieved that way

p-edit idk what that's referring to
-> you're also not really engaging me about the non-meta reasons i may be scumreading you, which i find scummy
(ie you ignored this post, tell me you don't want to talk about the bad posts or try to redirect the convo about them, etc)
Only the first point is meta related. I literally asked Skitter what he thought of your entrance on the wagon and told him it made me squirm. You’re trying to frame this like I’m along for the ride but I believe I was the one who switched momentum from Nancy to you.

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2019 2:22 pm
by Nibbui
In post 1556, the worst wrote:
Nibbui = very very likely town but his frozenness and stiffness rn is making me panic
like, what does this even mean?

I'm literally jumping between voting you and Mastina all day today

I was literally jumping between whiteknighting and accepting Nancy lynch

I even commented to Mastina that she had good points about podoboq

I'm not stiff really imo

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2019 2:24 pm
by LolWagons
Oh my duck

For the love of god why are you not hammering.

Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2019 2:25 pm
by the worst
In post 1571, LolWagons wrote:
In post 1416, skitter30 wrote:
In post 1410, skitter30 wrote:no, i checked before i voted, that's the third

in case you're wondering:
-> things i may have seen as townie from you idk if they're ai anymore
-> you have a bunch of bad posts (pl, nancy intent to hammer, filthy) that feel wrong
-> you feel fake-bravado-y. insinuating that you may be nk'd tonight is ridiculously out of touch with the gamestate given that you aren't obvtown by any means and multiple people are saying they'd like to lynch you; i believe you know that you prob aren't getting nk'd tonight so that felt fake and like an attempt to portray confidence in your towniness when you're not being percieved that way

p-edit idk what that's referring to
-> you're also not really engaging me about the non-meta reasons i may be scumreading you, which i find scummy
(ie you ignored this post, tell me you don't want to talk about the bad posts or try to redirect the convo about them, etc)
Only the first point is meta related. I literally asked Skitter what he thought of your entrance on the wagon and told him it made me squirm. You’re trying to frame this like I’m along for the ride but I believe I was the one who switched momentum from Nancy to you.
the first three points.... only make sense in the context of me being me and feeling wrong / having bad posts that "feel wrong" and being fake-bravado-ey which is not a wolftell and is only something skitter identifies as coming from scum!me sometimes (for the record: likely American presidents mafia). Only the LAST point references non meta points and it was not a non meta point. it was asking me to engage her on ingame stuff.

you are bullshitting unabashedly.