Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2020 10:01 am
that was my question too! im learning, titus!In post 1566, Titus wrote:Alright, I read the rules and the VCs.
My question is... why is the Noraa wagon so static without a counterwagon?
that was my question too! im learning, titus!In post 1566, Titus wrote:Alright, I read the rules and the VCs.
My question is... why is the Noraa wagon so static without a counterwagon?
There is no consensus second, and we have been doing nothing of that sort. It is expected that whichever town takes the scroll will not be listening to instruction, except for this phase where there appears to be consensus that Noraa should be one of the cursed.In post 1573, Titus wrote: So effectively, we need to find two scums to end the day. Who is the consensus second? Have we been using HURT tags to indicate a preference?
Assuming Noraa does flip scum, then we should be passing to a consensus scumread to keep the chain moving.In post 1551, Tayl0r Swift wrote:you never pass the scroll to a townie on purpose. the use of the second scrollholder should be to give the scroll to people who are hard to sort. that way you sort the slot and if its town you lose nothing. but its never bad to give the scroll to scum.In post 1549, Adorable wrote:If we are not doing Noraa first then I would lean more on Unowen is scum which was mentioned earlier. And also I wanted to add on #101 what Theta said are my thoughts exactly. On #680 it looked like Isis also had the same thoughts as me and Theta which makes me think Isis is also probably town with Theta. On #708 Unowen said Isis is suspicious and I would have assumed town Unowen would have picked up on what Theta was saying on #101 and would have also assumed Isis also picked up on this too and would have leaned town on Isis. This makes me think scum did not know town were asked to confirm that scum had daytalk.
I also saw somewhere that doing this t>s>t is bad and I'm assuming town would have to pass the scroll to a town read if the first scroll is handed to a town player.
Why wouldn't we want the town who takes the scroll to have direction?In post 1576, UNOwen wrote:There is no consensus second, and we have been doing nothing of that sort. It is expected that whichever town takes the scroll will not be listening to instruction, except for this phase where there appears to be consensus that Noraa should be one of the cursed.In post 1573, Titus wrote: So effectively, we need to find two scums to end the day. Who is the consensus second? Have we been using HURT tags to indicate a preference?
Ok, you can be in my townbin for now. I'm a sucker for kissasses.In post 1575, Tayl0r Swift wrote:that was my question too! im learning, titus!In post 1566, Titus wrote:Alright, I read the rules and the VCs.
My question is... why is the Noraa wagon so static without a counterwagon?
I would sum up the case as this:In post 1574, Titus wrote:Those are usually the options. That's why I asked for the case on Noraa to determine which it was.
Direction yes, instruction no.In post 1578, Titus wrote: Why wouldn't we want the town who takes the scroll to have direction?
This sounds like Noraa is just an angry emotional player. I'd be run up half my games with this standard. Do you not believe the case?In post 1580, MURDERCAT wrote:I would sum up the case as this:In post 1574, Titus wrote:Those are usually the options. That's why I asked for the case on Noraa to determine which it was.
- Noraa had what looked like a fake town slip early on about the number of scum there are in the game
- When pressured, Noraa went into LAMIST content generation mode
- Noraa talked about passing the scroll to LLD, who is widely town read, out of spite. This looks like a setup to make it seem as if the blatant town kill isn't actually coming from scum to keep some confusion going into the 3rd flip.
Why? It's not like there's a mob doctor.In post 1581, UNOwen wrote:Direction yes, instruction no.In post 1578, Titus wrote: Why wouldn't we want the town who takes the scroll to have direction?
I'm currently at about 70% chance of Noraa scum. The problem is that Noraa is an emotional player and did have a very strong emotional reaction. But I also respect her scum game enough to believe that she would use that in her favor and she recently said that she fakes townslips in all her scum games.In post 1582, Titus wrote:This sounds like Noraa is just an angry emotional player. I'd be run up half my games with this standard. Do you not believe the case?
Because most people will want to have some degree of autonomy over their venge-kill.In post 1583, Titus wrote: Why? It's not like there's a mob doctor.
Where is this?In post 1584, MURDERCAT wrote:she recently said that she fakes townslips in all her scum games.
In post 84, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:because you said in the postgame here:
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... #p12236870
that you fake townslips as scum, and
looks like a faked townslip.In post 75, Noraa wrote:Isis are you allowed to tell us how many scum there are?
I don't really believe you didn't read the first page of the setup and dont know how many scum there are.
ok you can explain this since Hectic says its ok.In post 1537, Tayl0r Swift wrote:isis would not have replaced out of this game had she been scum. i know its a bit unfair to use that argument, but its true.
Fair enough. Enjoyment over objectively good approach.In post 1585, UNOwen wrote:Because most people will want to have some degree of autonomy over their venge-kill.In post 1583, Titus wrote: Why? It's not like there's a mob doctor.
We have been avoiding this to avoid giving scum info about who to kill, as they can choose townies who won't kill them. Whether or not you agree with that approach.In post 1589, Titus wrote:In the future, I'd still love to see hurt tags as a secondary vote.
I want to vote Noraa after that, but I don't want to end the day. I'm not a big fan of meta usually but when it's self prescribed then...In post 1587, MURDERCAT wrote:In post 84, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:because you said in the postgame here:
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... #p12236870
that you fake townslips as scum, and
looks like a faked townslip.In post 75, Noraa wrote:Isis are you allowed to tell us how many scum there are?
I don't really believe you didn't read the first page of the setup and dont know how many scum there are.
A competent scumteam will have been reading the thread and know this anyway though?In post 1590, MURDERCAT wrote:We have been avoiding this to avoid giving scum info about who to kill, as they can choose townies who won't kill them. Whether or not you agree with that approach.In post 1589, Titus wrote:In the future, I'd still love to see hurt tags as a secondary vote.
It is worth noting that we keep all the time left on the deadline when we pass a scroll. We just add 2 days to itIn post 1591, Titus wrote:I want to vote Noraa after that, but I don't want to end the day.
and that is why we are voting for who else we think is scumIn post 1591, Titus wrote:I want to vote Noraa after that, but I don't want to end the day. I'm not a big fan of meta usually but when it's self prescribed then...In post 1587, MURDERCAT wrote:In post 84, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:because you said in the postgame here:
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... #p12236870
that you fake townslips as scum, and
looks like a faked townslip.In post 75, Noraa wrote:Isis are you allowed to tell us how many scum there are?
I don't really believe you didn't read the first page of the setup and dont know how many scum there are.
Oh, I wasn't aware of that.In post 1594, MURDERCAT wrote:It is worth noting that we keep all the time left on the deadline when we pass a scroll. We just add 2 days to itIn post 1591, Titus wrote:I want to vote Noraa after that, but I don't want to end the day.
that is what the dayvig shot that mafia has doesIn post 1594, MURDERCAT wrote:It is worth noting that we keep all the time left on the deadline when we pass a scroll. We just add 2 days to itIn post 1591, Titus wrote:I want to vote Noraa after that, but I don't want to end the day.