Mafiascum.net

In post 1593, Lady 5 wrote:Is it possible to replace Out and grab someone to replace in?

In post 1622, Lady 5 wrote:

In post 1615, Lady 6 wrote:Bullshit. You bc can do it.

I think I know who L5 is and who he'd invite. :/

I highly doubt you know this person.

In post 1627, Lady 1 wrote:Do you people not understand the point of an alt game?

In post 1536, Lady 6 wrote:

In post 1535, Gentleman 5 wrote:

In post 1533, Lady 6 wrote:

In post 1524, Gentleman 8 wrote:

In post 1513, Gentleman 4 wrote:That is to say I would like to hear much more from Gentleman 8, and I, too, will be severely disappointed if this is all he has to offer today.

What, exactly, would you like me to offer? I'm not reading 60 pages of nonsense pregame.

If you didn't read, how did you propose to L7? How would you have known to?

Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Well, follow the implication of if he's scum to it's conclusion. Why L7 over L5 L6 (me) or L1?

I am a firm believer L1 should sit based on this.
L5 is the easy mislynch in this setup.
Then picking between L6 and me, L7 is further from being correct.

In post 1626, Lady 6 wrote:

In post 1622, Lady 5 wrote:

In post 1615, Lady 6 wrote:Bullshit. You bc can do it.

I think I know who L5 is and who he'd invite. :/

I highly doubt you know this person.

I am her sooo.... Just play the game. Either town it up so you can partner with G3 or take your shot.

I'm trying to do both.

In post 1626, Lady 6 wrote:

In post 1622, Lady 5 wrote:

In post 1615, Lady 6 wrote:Bullshit. You bc can do it.

I think I know who L5 is and who he'd invite. :/

I highly doubt you know this person.

I am her sooo.... Just play the game. Either town it up so you can partner with G3 or take your shot.

I'm trying to do both.

In post 1631, Lady 6 wrote:Lady 1, you seem to have plenty of time to needle Lady 5 but no time to answer the question regarding which single gentleman you prefer.

In post 1629, Gentleman 5 wrote:

Dear Catherine,

Thank you for your time, I appreciate your timely response in such a hectic situation. We are currently dealing with a lady who is thinking of jumping off a ledge so as you probably know, never a dull moment haha.

I wish you the best in finding a date to the dance. Its pretty exclusive. Guess we will see what happens.

Sincerely,
Allen

In post 1628, Lady 6 wrote:

In post 1627, Lady 1 wrote:Do you people not understand the point of an alt game?

Do you understand scumhunting? Town blocking?

In post 1630, Lady 1 wrote:

In post 1536, Lady 6 wrote:

In post 1535, Gentleman 5 wrote:

In post 1533, Lady 6 wrote:

In post 1524, Gentleman 8 wrote:

In post 1513, Gentleman 4 wrote:That is to say I would like to hear much more from Gentleman 8, and I, too, will be severely disappointed if this is all he has to offer today.

What, exactly, would you like me to offer? I'm not reading 60 pages of nonsense pregame.

If you didn't read, how did you propose to L7? How would you have known to?

Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Well, follow the implication of if he's scum to it's conclusion. Why L7 over L5 L6 (me) or L1?

I am a firm believer L1 should sit based on this.
L5 is the easy mislynch in this setup.
Then picking between L6 and me, L7 is further from being correct.

L6, can you explain this post for why I should sit? I do not understand the reasoning behind this post.

In post 1637, Gentleman 1 wrote:I've been busy, but keeping track of activity, and this seems to have exploded recently.

In post 1639, Lady 5 wrote:She usually pushed really hard so if anyone would be her it would be Lady 2 but as I said I doubt she is playing in this game.

In post 1631, Lady 6 wrote:Lady 1, you seem to have plenty of time to needle Lady 5 but no time to answer the question regarding which single gentleman you prefer.

In post 1638, Lady 6 wrote:

In post 1630, Lady 1 wrote:

In post 1536, Lady 6 wrote:

In post 1535, Gentleman 5 wrote:

In post 1533, Lady 6 wrote:

In post 1524, Gentleman 8 wrote:

In post 1513, Gentleman 4 wrote:That is to say I would like to hear much more from Gentleman 8, and I, too, will be severely disappointed if this is all he has to offer today.

What, exactly, would you like me to offer? I'm not reading 60 pages of nonsense pregame.

If you didn't read, how did you propose to L7? How would you have known to?

Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Well, follow the implication of if he's scum to it's conclusion. Why L7 over L5 L6 (me) or L1?

I am a firm believer L1 should sit based on this.
L5 is the easy mislynch in this setup.
Then picking between L6 and me, L7 is further from being correct.

L6, can you explain this post for why I should sit? I do not understand the reasoning behind this post.

If G8 is randomly picking, why not just pick the first single lady. She's his partner.

In post 1644, Lady 1 wrote:

In post 1638, Lady 6 wrote:

In post 1630, Lady 1 wrote:

In post 1536, Lady 6 wrote:

In post 1535, Gentleman 5 wrote:

In post 1533, Lady 6 wrote:

In post 1524, Gentleman 8 wrote:

In post 1513, Gentleman 4 wrote:That is to say I would like to hear much more from Gentleman 8, and I, too, will be severely disappointed if this is all he has to offer today.

What, exactly, would you like me to offer? I'm not reading 60 pages of nonsense pregame.

If you didn't read, how did you propose to L7? How would you have known to?

Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Well, follow the implication of if he's scum to it's conclusion. Why L7 over L5 L6 (me) or L1?

I am a firm believer L1 should sit based on this.
L5 is the easy mislynch in this setup.
Then picking between L6 and me, L7 is further from being correct.

L6, can you explain this post for why I should sit? I do not understand the reasoning behind this post.

If G8 is randomly picking, why not just pick the first single lady. She's his partner.

How do you know he is randomly picking?

In post 1645, Lady 6 wrote:

In post 1644, Lady 1 wrote:

In post 1638, Lady 6 wrote:

In post 1630, Lady 1 wrote:

In post 1536, Lady 6 wrote:

In post 1535, Gentleman 5 wrote:

In post 1533, Lady 6 wrote:

In post 1524, Gentleman 8 wrote:

In post 1513, Gentleman 4 wrote:That is to say I would like to hear much more from Gentleman 8, and I, too, will be severely disappointed if this is all he has to offer today.

What, exactly, would you like me to offer? I'm not reading 60 pages of nonsense pregame.

If you didn't read, how did you propose to L7? How would you have known to?

Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Well, follow the implication of if he's scum to it's conclusion. Why L7 over L5 L6 (me) or L1?

I am a firm believer L1 should sit based on this.
L5 is the easy mislynch in this setup.
Then picking between L6 and me, L7 is further from being correct.

L6, can you explain this post for why I should sit? I do not understand the reasoning behind this post.

If G8 is randomly picking, why not just pick the first single lady. She's his partner.

How do you know he is randomly picking?

He's not. That's the point of the post.

In post 526, Lady 5 wrote:

In post 503, Gentleman 3 wrote:I mean I think it's pretty clear-cut?
I ask for clarification in 350
G6 calls my questioning bad and heavily implies that it's scummy in 354 and 356
I defend my question by telling G6 that he shouldn't be ambiguous in 362
I later explain that I only wanted a clarification (372)

Personally I don’t trust Gentleman 6.
If he doesn’t make himself “69” then I’ll tell Piplup to use bubble beam on him!

In post 530, Gentleman 4 wrote:

In post 529, Gentleman 8 wrote:

Fashionably late of course, friends. I do say, this shall be a splendid affair. Absolutely spiffing!

Hi Michael

In post 539, Lady 5 wrote:

In post 537, Gentleman 1 wrote:

In post 494, Gentleman 3 wrote:

In post 480, Gentleman 1 wrote:Outside of some small concerns about Celeste I have practically no solid suspicions at this moment.

Interesting. Want to talk about this?

I had a small feeling some of what Celeste was expressing didn’t feel genuine, I believe.

So which lady would you ask out?

In post 540, Lady 5 wrote:Also @Gent 1

What made you want to respond to Gent 6’s Post?
Did you just want to point out you are getting sick of my joke? :l

In post 546, Lady 5 wrote:It also makes it easy late game if “69” is both mafia, we take out 2 mafia without having to worry about losing a Town Member.

In post 1301, Gentleman 4 wrote:

In post 1294, Lady 8 wrote:

In post 1283, Gentleman 4 wrote:Lady 8, have you said the only things that you have to contribute after your catch-up?

In post 1292, Gentleman 4 wrote:I will admit I'm markedly disappointed in Lady 8's contributions today.

If you're town instead of just throwing shade maybe you can make this game more bearable by engaging in conversation with me and asking me questions because yes, the name `${Gender} ${Number}` is definitely helping me cognitively recognize players easier.

I apologize if it comes off as just throwing shade, this isn't my intent and I think I've made it pretty obvious that I think you're town. I was just hoping to be able to engage with you on several topics -- perhaps my reaction was bad but it doesn't come across in a particularly positive way when the first and only thing of note that you have to comment on is how you think my partner should be dead, and even then based solely off a post that (at least it came across to me in such a way) was merely responsive to how toxic a certain player was being to deal with. I don't know about you but I've rarely found solid basis in calling another player scum simply because they remarked on how little they want to play with a person after said person told someone they can go die (and called that someone else a repugnant toad ).