Page 67 of 109
Posted: Sun May 05, 2013 8:26 am
by fferyllt
ton of buddying from GM in that game. Which reminds me of the cross-accusations of buddying between GM and Mac in this game.
Posted: Sun May 05, 2013 8:28 am
by Ineffective
Im agreeing with you there. Not seeing much difference from GM tho
VOTE: GM
Posted: Sun May 05, 2013 8:29 am
by Ineffective
In post 1650, fferyllt wrote:ton of buddying from GM in that game. Which reminds me of the cross-accusations of buddying between GM and Mac in this game.
Where did that happen. Useful info
Posted: Sun May 05, 2013 8:32 am
by Ineffective
I need to look into GIF more as well but im pretty solid on this vote being right
Posted: Sun May 05, 2013 8:42 am
by Ineffective
In post 216, Deras wrote: In post 150, Revenus wrote:Deras: I've already given out three townreads, they haven't changed and you should know where you and carey stand.
The people I haven't given reads on:
Yeah sorry, I meant on those you hadn't.
In post 170, goodmorning wrote:The good news is that Scum can't NK me or I'll flip, so if there's a Doc it throws the choice "IC or Towniest, who will Scum kill" right out the window.
I don't like this reasoning, I feel like you're setting up an excuse because you KNOW you won't be NK no matter what.
In post 195, goodmorning wrote:129: Comes after several people have given reads, and doesn't really cover much new ground (if any). In one sentence accuses me of going after easy targets while staying off of the... easy... targets? SEEMS LEGIT.
Seriously, ask yourself: Who are the easiest targets in this game? Carey and Deras, right? Who's been going after them again? JUST SAYING. JUST. SAYING.
132: Who goes easy on someone acting scummy? SCUM
Unless I'm misinterpreting this, the second point seems to contradict the first, on 132 you're arguing against ff for going easy on me because of perceived scummy behaviour, but in the first one you said going after Carey and me was the easy (and thus scummy) thing to do?
Posted: Sun May 05, 2013 8:45 am
by Ineffective
I agree with derus 100% there
Posted: Sun May 05, 2013 8:52 am
by fferyllt
It started with GM in
698
More in
869.
Says she's losing her town read in part for buddying in
914
Mac responds with counteraccusation in
919
Mac says it's a false accusation in
952
GM reiterates it's buddying in
1100
Mac counters
1105 "good player" vs "competent"
GM says the difference is timing and situation in
1124
GM says that Mac mediating the early-ish argument between her and me, while taking GM's side was also a form of buddying in
1288 and later
1291points to post
693 as a major example?
I need to do more research...I don't remember quite how they mended fences.
Posted: Sun May 05, 2013 9:03 am
by Ineffective
In post 880, Eye Urn wrote:GM:
1) I think you've way overblown the Fropome thing, looking for something to grab onto and continuing to do so for no good reason.
2) The fact that you explicitly asked me only for my read of you still weighs heavily on my mind as something that you would have done as scum in that situation and not as town.
3) The part of
170 that Deras pointed out in
216 and your reaction to that in
316. You were caught and tried to twist it, and it only got in deeper.
4) Continually not even reading and understanding what's posted, like when you asked what I find scummy about posts that I made (
800 and
806).
You clearly didn't even read them, you just assumed that I was being unspecific and wanted more details.
how teh fuk did this wagon die
Posted: Sun May 05, 2013 9:15 am
by Ineffective
Lets re-ignite it.
Unless VE is scum this is a 2/3 lynch.
Im 100% sure on ffer and barcode as town
Posted: Sun May 05, 2013 9:20 am
by TraceyLyn11
[L-3] Z7-852: (goodmorning)
[L-4] fferyllt:
[L-2] Mac: (VisceraEyes, GuyInFreezer)
[L-4] Ineffective:
[L-3] VisceraEyes: (Z7-852)
[L-3] GuyInFreezer: (Mac)
[L-3] goodmorning: (Ineffective)
Not Voting:
1 (fferyllt)
- With seven alive, it takes four to lynch.
- Day Two's deadline: May 16, 2013 CST or in (expired on 2013-05-16 15:30:00).
- V/LA: VisceraEyes ((expired on 2013-05-06 00:00:00))
Posted: Sun May 05, 2013 9:27 am
by fferyllt
Ineffective, one question. Have you read GM's early case on me in
137?
Posted: Sun May 05, 2013 9:32 am
by Ineffective
No i havnt... I didnt see the value in reading cases from someone im assuming is scum. Cases are the easiest way to leave an impression intentionally
Posted: Sun May 05, 2013 9:33 am
by Ineffective
Ill read it anyways
Posted: Sun May 05, 2013 9:45 am
by Ineffective
Wait was that supposed to be a case against you? I think i misunderstood or u linked the wrong post... He seems to townread you there?
Posted: Sun May 05, 2013 9:46 am
by Ineffective
She*
Posted: Sun May 05, 2013 9:52 am
by fferyllt
yeah....wrong spoilered post. this is it.
195
Posted: Sun May 05, 2013 10:36 am
by Ineffective
It actually looks pretty similar to his case in 109 of the thread i linked. Doesnt change my mind a bit
Posted: Sun May 05, 2013 10:41 am
by Ineffective
Vote with me ffer u wont regret it
Posted: Sun May 05, 2013 10:44 am
by fferyllt
In post 1666, Ineffective wrote:It actually looks pretty similar to his case in 109 of the thread i linked. Doesnt change my mind a bit
109 was one of the cases I looked at when I meta'd GM after she posted the case on me. I thought it was more succinct and persuasive than that huge ramble she posted in this thread. I think my vote actually surprised her, though.
p edit yeah that's where I am at. I'm curious to see what VE makes of the last day.
VOTE: goodmorning
Posted: Sun May 05, 2013 11:04 am
by Ineffective
Ya 109 was more planned out and such but similar in the fact that it was based on obviously bad reasons... So my thought was that he is perfectly capable of making a bad push as mafia
Posted: Sun May 05, 2013 12:08 pm
by Ineffective
*she
Lol
Posted: Sun May 05, 2013 12:20 pm
by Ineffective
Dont call me that. I retired that account and quit EM due to it origionating as an account intended to prove i would be fit for a leadership role, and having no desire to continue on as a casual user, and having entirely incompetent people modded before me time after time for 5 months despite being triple nominated in my last attempt... And due to the aristocracy being revealed as nothing more than a "friends of shacky and riot" club as of late.. And having them forcefully block me out of a position that most people recognise i deserved more than half of the current team... And them listening to nasty rumors from my ex and using it as a reason not to like me...........
So much grrrrr
Posted: Sun May 05, 2013 12:23 pm
by Ineffective
Also forum mafia is so much more natural for me anyways... Tbh i suck at finding scum in ten minutes
Posted: Sun May 05, 2013 1:39 pm
by VisceraEyes
Phone posting waiting for plane. I approve of both Mac and GM lynches. Replacement making EU look much better in spite of Amished tell.
Posted: Sun May 05, 2013 1:41 pm
by VisceraEyes
I never fully agreed with its accuracy any ol' way. Welcome replacements.