Mafiascum.net

What is amished tell¿

Saying "oh man my predecessor was scummy"

Like I said... I've been of the mind that townies can do that just as easily, but MS towns go nuts over it sometimes.

Ah ya.... I was legit hoping fir scum tho... Wasnt sure i wanted to replace in a 60 page game as town... Took a quick read of first posts to gauge likeliness of a scum role pm and decided to do it

So did you need anything specific from me?

I think things can wait until you have time to catch up on a larger screen than a phone.

In post 1679, VisceraEyes wrote:So did you need anything specific from me?

For u to read up and sheep ofc :p

I'm caught up lady... PS I wasn't budding you I just thought we were buddies

I have a 3 or so hour layover in LAX so don't worry about my limitations. I have nothing better to do.

So you prefer GM to Mac today Inef?

Viscera... If you are town this should be a no braininer... If you are scum you should busvote 100%

Pedit: yes. Is there a reason i shouldnt?

it seemed too obvious to be a scum tactic. I am not used to playing with people who don't know my game better than I do. I still don't trust the obvtown reads people develop on me here.

Negative just making sure your vote wasn't like a placeholder until Mac got back. GM did something that really pinged with me earlier on. I find it.

I think if he flips town my fos will be GIF/VE team... Dont hold me to that tho... Also a townflip isnt likely... Its really rare that i am this confident in a vote

In post 1546, goodmorning wrote:I must say that consistency in the lack of certainty is not necessarily a Town thing.

In post 1547, VisceraEyes wrote:It's not necessarily a scum thing either is it Ms. IC?

In post 1548, goodmorning wrote:Quite so.

I saw this as scummy because if it's null by definition then why did she even say it?

Ya hes been spouting things of similar useless nature as if they were significant all game

Im trying to figure out why you seem to agree yet you havnt changed your vote yet

Because... I like Mac lynch too and it's closer. Worry not I help you keel da scum.

Wait is not closer is it?

^^ That's L-1

Time to role-fish claim GM

Just in case someone flies in and hammers and mod is here to end twilight immediately... I will explain an earlier post regarding if ME flips town (which i highly doubt.

Out of my townreads VE is the most tenative... He showed willingness to vote anyone but ffer (solid town imo) me, and GIF (one of the three i was considering today)

That pretty much paints him as a scumteam with gif if ME flips town fmpov....

In case tomorrow is lylo and i die, i would suggest considering this, but also would suggest an alternative voting method.

If you feel the need to express a vote on lylo... Be wary of an actual vote as both scum may be lurking to hammer a misvote. I dont think it is against the rules toue something like the unvote tag with a name in between to fake-vote until a concencus is reached... And i think it would be wise to do so

Toue = to use

In post 1644, Ineffective wrote:

In post 1641, goodmorning wrote:And before I get questions:

Rolefishing is not ever proTown. EVER. The only motivation one can have to rolefish is that they are Scum.

actually this is false and i am disapointed in you for breaking your IC promise relating to not lying about mechanics. It always entirely depends on the situation and if you are a PRyourself - actually - any case where you can pecieve a pr as town without letting scum know that you percieve that PRis benificial to town - also --- having that read and outting it to the public is not a scumtell because scum has no incentive to share that information when they can just night kill it --- i could list more scenarios where it is a total non-tell because of mechanic related reasons but suffice to say your broad stroke statement is bullshit

The situation you describe is not, in point of fact, rolefishing. Good try.

In post 1642, fferyllt wrote: depends. town basically lost my first newbie game on day 3 when the JK didn't out her targets after my kill went missing on night 2.

That's a PR problem, not a claim problem.

In post 1647, Ineffective wrote:Did GM do that to anyone here?

I don't think so.

In post 1658, Ineffective wrote:Lets re-ignite it.

You are welcome to try.

In post 1678, Ineffective wrote:Ah ya.... I was legit hoping fir scum tho...

Third time.

In post 1694, Ineffective wrote:Time to role-fish claim GM

I'd prefer to wait until someone intents. Keep up the L-1 wagons on me though, folks, I'm digging the attention.

You already claimed pr by implying you had something to claim. No reason not to unless you are afraid you have a cc... Also thats rlly convenient how you highlighted the first part of my rolefishing comment and ignored the game-relevant one about mac on L-1.

Also the part you quoted was talking about subtle role-fishing which is the only smart way to do it as town or scum... You cant get the solid reads i mentioned without finding a way to do that... Also i jave PR reads already and you wernt one of them

In post 1698, Ineffective wrote:You already claimed pr by implying you had something to claim.¹ No reason not to unless you are afraid you have a cc...² Also thats rlly convenient how you highlighted the first part of my rolefishing comment and ignored the game-relevant one about mac on L-1.³

Also the part you quoted was talking about subtle role-fishing which is the only smart way to do it as town or scum...⁴ You cant get the solid reads i mentioned without finding a way to do that...⁵ Also i jave PR reads already and you wernt one of them⁶

1. This is silly.
2. There are plenty of reasons not to. The big one is this: wagons get run up to L-1 frequently. Unless someone is actually going to hammer me I prefer to remain as I am. There are many bits of knowledge Scum can use against Town, but few of those that they don't have already. My role is one of these.
3. If I were Mac then I'm sure any of your comments pertaining to Mac would pertain to me. I am not Mac, and further I do not see what comment you are referring to despite a thorough scan of your ISO.
4. That's not role-fishing. That's a little process known as .
5. may not be able to; however, I wouldn't presume to speak for you and wish that you would not presume to speak for me.
6. And I care why?

Final thoughts for now, just in case I get derphammered in my sleep:

A. My reads are unchanged since the last time I gave them.
B. Even if you have a townread on someone:
1. it doesn't make them Town
2. it doesn't make them infallible.
C. Town, keep trying. The showing so far has been incredibly pitiful.