You honestly think that, at this point, if I am scum that would be true?UltimaAvalon wrote:Heres the bottom line Guardian cannot determine who the scum on his wagon is, because there are no scum on his wagon.Guardian wrote:if you [Kinetic] come up town, then Spambot is town, and there were 2 scum in the game
Yeah, that makes little sense. I would be so bus-able right now.UltimaAvalon wrote:Of the 4 people not voting him, 3 are scum, and 1 is cautious townie.
Lies, all town.UltimaAvalon wrote:Guardian is scum. Albert is scum. Either Ibby or PJ is scum.
I am pointing the finger at my wagon... as it is scum-laden.UltimaAvalon wrote:He's pointing fingers at absolutely everyone, hoping to God that someone believes at least one word he says, and I'm not reading his Self-PBPA, but thats probably because I already know what it will say the whole time.
Yeah, that has been my play, and it makes sense -- if Albert PJ Ibby and whoever else is town accept that I am town, then we basically are on cruise control to win....UltimaAvalon wrote:Look here, this is nothing but helpful to town, look how reasonable this sounds, how can I be scum after saying this, blah blah blah blah blah.
I much, much prefer a Kinetic play over the UA play (as I have explained many times), but if UA is the best we are going to get, that is quite a bold move, and if we are right Kinetic and Spambot are obviously next and that's good...
I worry that we are hitting the one townie on my wagon, but hitting someone on my wagon is (obviously imo) much, much better than hitting me.
I am not going to place a vote on UA yet, but again if PJ and Ibby are not to be convinced that Kinetic is a better play then I would be willing to vote UA .
And that was quite a scummy post by him, trying to convince the people whose votes he needs (who happen to all be town) that three of them are scum.
I wasn't kidding when I asked your opinions on what you want me to do next re: this game. I know you are town, and you are the people I have to convince, so help me help you ...