Mafiascum.net

In post 1670, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:

In post 1620, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 1618, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:

In post 1616, Battle Mage wrote:Nancy, any thoughts on my S&W read?

I don’t understand why you have them at the bottom of your readslist.

bottom is scummiest...

That doesn’t even remotely answer my question.

In post 1638, Batsunami wrote:

In post 1460, Saudade wrote:DIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE SCUM

Back off. Fey is town.

In post 1574, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:

In post 1568, Saudade wrote:I literally dont rate you, its not an insult you're just an average player get on with the game now and stop feeling so shocked

Flattery won’t get you to endgame sport. You currently owe your game life to Noraa.

In post 885, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 858, quiet wrote:Short summery: if lunar is scum, they have a ringer partner. I guess I’d entertain mikul then, but could just as easily be anyone else. If lunar town, I’m very sure there is at least one ringer scum. In the words of our dearly departed cop, “fuck this game is hard”. Scum never had to put themselves at risk yesterday, as the majority of people on the chopping block were town, and all PRs are eliminated or blocked forever now. I am most concerned about going into the late game with me, Lunar, mikul alive, with some ringers left, and me always getting voted, or lunar always getting voted, which sounds like a really really bad deal. An innocent ringer gets shot tonight. It feels like we should elim at least one of them and hope...or just get rid of me, to make sure a mikul, quiet, Lunar, x, x world doesn’t develop. That sounds world feels to me like a loss.

this is an awful idea.

I know, I'll pick 3 players, including myself, I think are town, and have them as the elim-pool now.

Dude, if you're town, please re-think this

In post 1371, Battle Mage wrote:"I call it "the DK tell"
If someone that is typically unlikeable and not charismatic is suddenly charismatic and towny, they are scum. If you agree with everything they say and find them an absolute beacon of towniness, they are scum. Period."


wow, charming thanks. so your foolproof scum case is "BM is usually a big smelly jerk, and he's being nice and useful here. Let's kill him NOW"? The big flaw in the case is, your flattering assessment of my personality is...not AI. Or are you saying I'm unlikeable and not charismatic as town, but charismatic and friendly as scum?

In post 1374, Battle Mage wrote:i would say, objectively, that's a bad argument which is disproven by your own meta on me.

In post 1672, Battle Mage wrote:i'm done. sorry but i really don't have the patience for another game like this where I try really hard and just get bombarded with nothingness and ultimately mis-elimmed for no good reason. someone else will do better in the slot. have fun all! <3

In post 1646, Batsunami wrote:

In post 1474, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:You aren’t going to run up the most obvious townie in the playerlist.

hehe Nancy gets what's up!
*brings a couple more blankies and curls up in Nancy's pocket*

In post 1582, Battle Mage wrote:Her vote is based on nothing even remotely credible, as i have explained and others have also commented on. And by her own admission, she has an abysmal record at reading me. The fact she is town is irrelevant and has been obvious since like page 3, and I'm wary of players pointing it out to score cheap points.

In post 1590, Battle Mage wrote:Solid Town
Batsunami (Noraa + Morning Tweet)
War and Peace (Ircher + samantha97)
Fey
5uffering Charlie and Snoopy (Marcistar + Shadowslug)
Saudade

In post 1658, 5uffering wrote:Yeah so. I had this thought as well. Then Battle Mage did something that pinged me the other way. I'm not sure if he'll confirm this, but I feel like he's taken on a new persona. At least trying to. I didn't want to approach it however but I felt like an air of frustration. There is some uncanniness in his responses no doubt.

The DK tell that Batsunami keeps talking about doesn't seem like a catch-all. I also don't believe it applies to Battle Mage. Battle Mage in his natural habitat gets himself into a lot of trouble with a good amount of the game. Battle Mage as scum is more reliant on avoiding this.

In post 1660, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 1650, Pyro wrote:Any reason for change of approach entering this game, Battle Mage?

i actually answered this earlier. noraa railed on me after for AtE or something. I wouldn't say it's a change of approach overall, across all setups. each game is different - there are examples of games where i have started with an intention of being very chill. it's not AI, it's just personality and mood driven i guess. in this game i was quite happy at the start because i got to play from the beginning unlike the last one, and it is my first large theme in a while, and i was hoping i could do better than last game.

admittedly some of that shine has worn off a bit with the likes of noraa and sherlock campaigning on "BM is scum, notwithstanding I can't think of a good reason why". I try, but it's pretty hard to engage without anything substantial to talk about.

In post 1663, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 1659, Batsunami wrote:

In post 1655, Battle Mage wrote:i mean, that isn't what she was selling, but how convenient

Yeah it was. I am selling tone and pyro is selling tone. You got a problem?

your problem not mine! be real - you took a look at the playerlist and thought it'd be fun to run BM up again right?

In post 1679, Sherlock and Watson wrote:I'm okay ending day and skipping replacement, that was gross af

-S

In post 1685, clidd wrote:I liked the meta on BM and I probably underestimated Nora's resolving potential if she's right.

But my position on BM has not changed.

In post 1691, Pyro wrote:viewtopic.php?t=85191&f=3&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&user_select%5B%5D=5673&user_select%5B%5D=0&user_select%5B%5D=0&user_sort=Go

In post 1694, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... &start=200

BM in Pooky vs FL