At least Jordan's trying at this point. Albert looks too much like scum giving up, though even that would be early...
So, with both prospective Lynchees at L-3, let's see what happens.
No it is not possible, the first person to by lynched will be the lynch for the day.HackerHuck wrote:Mod:Some clarification on the rules, please. Is it possible to lynch two people in one day, either through equal votes at deadline, or by one person using their two votes to hammer two people at lynch-1?
johhan wrote:unvote Jordan, Vote Albert.
At least Jordan's trying at this point. Albert looks too much like scum giving up, though even that would be early...
So, with both prospective Lynchees at, let's see what happens.L-3
undo wrote:Albert seems to be nervous. He has already claimed even being at lynch -3. Furthermore, his claim doesn't help him much... Vanilla townie is a typical claim for scum to do.
Unvote all
Double vote: Albert
I don't like johhans involvement in this.undo wrote:Oops I've just hammered Albert.
Bob700 wrote:Hey, I just wanted an answer to my question. Seems like I have received it.JordanA24 wrote:I'm simply convinced at the moment that Albert's telling the truth. Would scum really draw that much attention to themselves by casing a lynching vote on Page 3.
FOS: Bobfor going with the flow, lurking, and then coming out of nowhere to put me at -1.
Your answer somewhat justifies your actions, soSingle Unvote: Jordan. But regardless, I still have a feeling about you.
FOS: Jordan
Very risk averse. Not to mention I'm still suspicious of Jordan.Bob700 wrote:I voted for one reason, and one reason only. To get an explanation.undo wrote:Bob, you're too afraid to look scummy. If you had a clean consicence, you wouldn't have to unvote Jordan just because he told you it looked scummy to him.Bob wrote:Your answer somewhat justifies your actions, so Single Unvote: Jordan. But regardless, I still have a feeling about you.
FOS: Jordan
Single Unvote: Jordan
Single Vote: Bob
Why risk keeping someone at L1, after I got what I wanted?
Unvotes, yet casts more suspicion on Albert without voting for him? Nicely keeps him out of the voting record when we lynch a townie.yeahthatguy224 wrote:Hmm, well, since both of my votes were random votes, and I think were out of that now.
Unvote All
I do agree that Albert badly contradicted himself on that
'dont put people at -1 so soon'
'bam you're at -1 how does it feel'
a foolish play, scummy though, not sure of yet.
I also don't like how he forced jordan to vote TM, that imo is scummy.
Jordan, I didn't find your voting yourself scummy, I just found it amusing. You apparently have a sense of humor, and randomed yourself. Glad you got out of that. Now I just hope you're not scum.
So out of this discussion I see Albert as today's play, but not quite yet. If you notice, all of his votes are double votes. I'd like a little more of a majority vote before anything happens.
Followed by:Phoebus wrote:Two scumtells, two votes. two people. Brilliant.
vote: johann
vote: yeahthatguy
It's not much, but it looks like scum distancing to me.Phoebus wrote:unvote: johann ; vote: albert
demonstrating the recklessness of putting someone one away from a lynch is one thing...
what is with requiring a claim so early?
After voting, I suddenly realised I could be hammering Albert - which I did, unfortunately.HH wrote:@ undo - Why did you do a vote count after you had voted?
I agree. I have already exposed my opinion about Bob's scummy action in Day 1 - He voted Jordan and then immediately unvoted him with a nonsensical justification. Plus, look at the way takes advantage of the hammering situation and double votes me immediately, saying only: "for that very odd hammering of Albert". This is very vague and is no valid reason to cast a DOUBLE vote on someone. He acted discreetly, after an apparently innocent and helpful analysis post.I'm concerned about Bob and ThatNewGuy. Both have been lurking as we approached lynch and both have said some scummy things