Posted: Sun May 03, 2020 4:19 pm
No.
That's fine as well. The point is that they cannot night kill with 0 XP hence why they are gifting it to me. If they have none to gift, that achieves the same result. Essentially we will be able to infinite night until we all max out our upgrades and investigate everyone.In post 1748, Raya36 wrote:My other concern is what if they have 0 XP?
Thank you
Yes.In post 1743, Ame wrote:Raven, do you accept my plan?
Do you accept my plan?In post 1739, Ginngie wrote:yo can someone quote this post and tell me what I should do
im lazy river in this game rn
In that case besides my other concern (which is unlikely) it sounds good to meIn post 1751, Ame wrote:That's fine as well. The point is that they cannot night kill with 0 XP hence why they are gifting it to me. If they have none to gift, that achieves the same result. Essentially we will be able to infinite night until we all max out our upgrades and investigate everyone.In post 1748, Raya36 wrote:My other concern is what if they have 0 XP?
...
Can we get an updated VC, please?
mastina said this because she knows I know what scum!mastina does different from town!mastina, and I was giving her time to start doing what town!mastina does, but she never did and she left the game before she could do it, so yes, it's very likely we're dealing with a scum!mastina slot. I haven't read anything coming from Knight, but I'm willing to get rid of that slot rather than Raya.In post 622, mastina wrote:Actually.In post 361, Farkset wrote:@Pine, i think you are the authority here when talking about mastina, is that AI for her?
The authority for reading me this game would probably be Pink Ball.
VOTE: Knightmare491In post 1758, Pink Ball wrote:Well I didn't want to say it back on D1 because I wasn't willing to make a 1v1 against mastina but...mastina said this because she knows I know what scum!mastina does different from town!mastina, and I was giving her time to start doing what town!mastina does, but she never did and she left the game before she could do it, so yes, it's very likely we're dealing with a scum!mastina slot. I haven't read anything coming from Knight, but I'm willing to get rid of that slot rather than Raya.In post 622, mastina wrote:Actually.In post 361, Farkset wrote:@Pine, i think you are the authority here when talking about mastina, is that AI for her?
The authority for reading me this game would probably be Pink Ball.
I think so.In post 1757, Ame wrote:Hectic, do you accept the plan?
This implies we'll be able to go a few nights without kills but this isn't the case if there's any scum outside of the 3. Still, I think is a good strategy for the other reasons.In post 1707, Ame wrote:We aim investigative roles at them and continue this process over multiple days/nights while everyone else trains and upgrades.
It'd mean NK tried to bus both mastina and FarksetIn post 1741, Raven Branwen wrote:Why?
OhIn post 1741, Raven Branwen wrote:Ame hardclaimed vig and Farkset died. No one counterclaimed him.
PoEIn post 1741, Raven Branwen wrote:Why Hectic and Pine?
Can you elaborate on Martina?In post 1758, Pink Ball wrote:Well I didn't want to say it back on D1 because I wasn't willing to make a 1v1 against mastina but...mastina said this because she knows I know what scum!mastina does different from town!mastina, and I was giving her time to start doing what town!mastina does, but she never did and she left the game before she could do it, so yes, it's very likely we're dealing with a scum!mastina slot. I haven't read anything coming from Knight, but I'm willing to get rid of that slot rather than Raya.In post 622, mastina wrote:Actually.In post 361, Farkset wrote:@Pine, i think you are the authority here when talking about mastina, is that AI for her?
The authority for reading me this game would probably be Pink Ball.
Which claim?In post 1766, Creature wrote:Kinda skeptical about Hectic's claim
What was?In post 1769, Hectic wrote:I'm assuming that was intentional, Ame.