I honestly find it incredibly hard to believe Md will flip green here
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2018 12:17 am
by the worst
VOTE: Math
Just for the record. You and skitter are my two top townreads right now (which makes me very happy)
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2018 12:25 am
by skitter30
Just for the record if math flips scum I consider you a viable partner
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2018 12:26 am
by the worst
Cross that bridge when we come to it
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2018 12:45 am
by Draynth
I'd be fine with an MD lynch
VOTE: MathDino
That's L-2
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2018 12:46 am
by Draynth
Brief readslist
Spoiler: AP (Town)
I still think AP is town, but his intent on getting a strong PR suspect (by his own admission) to claim D1 is frustrating for me
Spoiler: Mathdino (Scum)
I think math is scum.
He seems a strong advocate for using meta and consistently cited it when reading people. That's fine.
What's not fine is when he reverts back to a "lynch draynth" mentality at various points throughout the day without bothering to A)do a metadive which he said he'd do (and yet you want to lynch me for similar reasons) B)read any of the games I linked for the above reason.
Also him switching to NSG with like 30 hours left while also calling skitter out for doing the same is super scummy to me.
Lastly is the points that TW and Skitter have discussed, makes a lot of sense in my books.
Spoiler: TheWorst (Town)
TW is probably town, read progression seems legitimate and doesn't seem to be trying to push any specific lynches but lynch the best candidate.
Spoiler: Sunshine13 (Town)
I really like his point about people pushing a no information lynch, it's a good observation in my opinion.
Spoiler: Uglyduck (Town)
Despite him trying to lynch me I think he's probably town.
The only thing I'm concerned about is how easily he tried to jump on NSG with MD (Possible scum partners?) but he said he was reading backwards which if true would make sense.
Spoiler: NSG (Town)
Probably town, seems genuinely frustrated with Math's arguments against her case(s). Doesn't feel like forced anger from scum.
Spoiler: Oxy (Scum)
He's Scum.
He's Scum.
He's Scum.
He's Scum.
He's Scum.
Did you really think there'd be anything else here?
Spoiler: Skitter30 (Town)
Skitter is obvtown to me at this point
Spoiler: pinturicchio (Town)
Everything he brings up feels like it's from a town trying to solve the game POV rather than scum trying to push a narrative POV
Spoiler: Scioness Sajj (Town)
Might seem weird but suggesting her own lynch seems townie to me as it's a kind of "Vt's are expendable, lynch me for info" kinda view. I don't necessarily agree with it but I also can't see scum suggesting it so *shrug*
Spoiler: ofrhz (Slight Scum lean)
He's felt super opportunistic for most of the game tbh
Spoiler: ruru (Town)
*Insert Tumbleweed.jpeg*
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2018 1:01 am
by ruru
Five votes are currently on a PR claim
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2018 1:02 am
by ruru
Lynch the dinosaur
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2018 1:16 am
by northsidegal
Would rather not
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2018 2:11 am
by brassherald
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2018 2:32 am
by Scioness Sajj
@mod replace me out, please.
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2018 2:33 am
by brassherald
Searching for a replacement for Scioness Sajj, deadline will be frozen until such a replacement is found, at the time a replacement comes in, there will be 48 hours on the clock, should a lynch have not been achieved at that time.
I don't see why it's beneficial to specify the role in this situation
Specifying the role allows scum to tell, in 2/5 cases, whether it's VT fake softing a role outside the setup or not
Scum can claim without getting CCed, so making scum claim a specific role on d1 doesn't help much
Almost half of VT fakeclaims instantly out themselves to scum by claiming a specific role
I am like 99.99% sure Md is aware of this because he studies setups
Doesn't this only imply MD is scummy in a world where Draynth is likely to fake claim PR as VT at the deadline?
Wouldn't that be kind of game throwing from town!draynth?
What am I missing?
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2018 2:36 am
by Oxy
@Sajj ?????
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2018 2:39 am
by Oxy
Well, the replace out basically spews sajj slot town - except in the case where she is scum with exactly MD, I guess...
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2018 2:59 am
by pinturicchio
OMG ofrhz and Dino are scumpartners in crime and there's no vig in the setup!!!
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2018 3:01 am
by ruru
In post 1837, Oxy wrote:Doesn't this only imply MD is scummy in a world where Draynth is likely to fake claim PR as VT at the deadline?
Wouldn't that be kind of game throwing from town!draynth?
What am I missing?
I think Draynth is currently doing town a service if he is VT
Suppose Draynth is VT, someone else hardclaims PR tomorrow, and he is alive. He can hardclaim VT at that point to avoid a situation where 3 PRs are claiming (which would bait the actual third PR to out), so it doesn't hurt town
If you trade VT!Draynth getting mislynched today for VT!Draynth getting mislynched (for lying) tomorrow, not much was lost, and it's not even guaranteed he would get lynched for lying. VT getting lynched is maybe the typical D1 outcome, but it's not an above average outcome
If VT!Draynth gets NKed, then obviously town gained a lot
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2018 3:14 am
by Oxy
The above post seems like bad theory to me. I must admit, I'm hard pressed to find an absolute reason why it's awful theory - someone please help me out - but it can't be right for VT to always claim a generic PR when they are getting wagoned D1.
People would have figured it out by now, if it was.
Oh I figured it out - it's because it gives scum the ability to soft claim PR, and then walk it back the next day. And people won't actually lynch them D2, because it becomes common place for VT to soft claim PR to stop themselves from getting lynched.
Also, D1's would become gross because literally every wagon would claim PR, and then what? Now you're in a situation where town is always lynching a claimed PR on D1, and sometimes those claims will be real.
@all please expand on why VT claiming PR to avoid a lynch is bad. I know it is, but... words.
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2018 3:19 am
by ruru
I think this is all fairly specific to the fact that scum can't be cced in this setup without a massclaim. Otherwise, claiming specific role would be pro-town and anyone not doing it would be suspicious
I guess in the game theoretically perfect game d1 claims are mostly irrelevant in this setup?
I do think it's extremely risky for scum to attempt in real life because real life towns are going to lynch liars more often than not (and not everyone is going to see the game the way I'm seeing it)
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2018 3:20 am
by pinturicchio
Draynth hasn' claimed PR so everything you're saying right now is nonsense. Vote Dino and win a wonderful price
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2018 3:29 am
by Oxy
In post 1843, ruru wrote:I think this is all fairly specific to the fact that scum can't be cced in this setup without a massclaim. Otherwise, claiming specific role would be pro-town and anyone not doing it would be suspicious
I haven't played a closed setup yet
but I bet VT's don't claim PR to save themselves from the lynch.
I'd really like to hear thoughts on this from someone like NSG.
Also, UNVOTE: because contrary to what Pinturicchio just said, draynth has claimed PR.
I'm game for a lynch on the worst, ofrhz, and skitter
In post 1843, ruru wrote:I think this is all fairly specific to the fact that scum can't be cced in this setup without a massclaim. Otherwise, claiming specific role would be pro-town and anyone not doing it would be suspicious
I haven't played a closed setup yet
but I bet VT's don't claim PR to save themselves from the lynch.
I think roles can be cced (e.g. "there are probably not 2 cops in the setup") and also flavor mistakes can make fake claims suspicious
I haven't played closed setups myself but I've seen fake claims (especially ambiguous soft claims) from VT in them, especially d1
The difference in this setup is scum picked the roles so they know exactly which roles can't be cced. That is highly unusual
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2018 3:35 am
by Oxy
In post 1847, pinturicchio wrote:Instead of being pretentious, you could show us where did Draynth claimed PR?
I don't think I'm being pretentious?
How are you reading that bit where he goes, I really don't want to claim with 12 hours left even though I'm barely ever in the thread?
Again, if he is VT, I think that is playing against win con?