Mafiascum.net

is there anyone who doesnt think theres a dichotomy between LLD and the worst with one scum in that pile?

Fridays and Mondays are my days off.

Fridays, my activity here tends to be a bit higher but still limited as I'm recovering from the heavy delivery days.

Sat-Sun are lighter workload, stocking shelves.

Monday is my +activity day off the week.

In post 1875, Gorkington wrote:is there anyone who doesnt think theres a dichotomy between LLD and the worst with one scum in that pile?

Because of the headbutting?

because
a) both feel scummy
b) i dont want to live in a world where they could be partners
c) it feels right in my gutsoulheart

fwiw I feel like there's one scum in us I'm like, 72% sure

In post 1878, Gorkington wrote:because
a) both feel scummy
b) i dont want to live in a world where they could be partners
c) it feels right in my gutsoulheart

That's not theater.

If one flips scum, the other is damned near conftown.

But I don't think that equates to meaning one MUST be scum.

Time for work.

Joy.

In post 1879, the worst wrote:fwiw I feel like there's one scum in us I'm like, 72% sure

Does LLD come out swinging as scum?

Now I'm really gone, lol.

it was probably a meaningless point to someone who doesnt have the same view of the gamestate as me. oh well.

p-edit: yeah probably. thats pretty NAI for her.

In post 1882, House wrote:

In post 1879, the worst wrote:fwiw I feel like there's one scum in us I'm like, 72% sure

Does LLD come out swinging as scum?

Now I'm really gone, lol.

not ai for her but she likes coming out swingin

Hi okay I finished what I needed to do this morning

So lemme find that gamma post

i have almost recovered from my hangover

In post 1583, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1210, Dwlee99 wrote:Pretty much all of them

Maybe not the poe one?

749 was because you pinged my tell about wagon logic fishing, and I wanted more info on it before passing hard judgment on the matter
764 was because you showed no signs of a PoE before (and obviously it was horseshit based on ensuing posts)
787 was trying to track if you were actually sorting or just spewing bullshit that sounds believable.
1144 is because I think Meg and you can be partners (tho tbh I also thought that in LN 235 and was wrong)

I’d like it if you could

actually engage

with any of them. Because so far you’ve basically blown me off which idk, feels a little weird for you especially with your read on me.

What is wagon logic fishing? I asked for obvious reasons - I wanted to understand why people were wagoning Kazyan.

I explained my poe was based on thinking town were wagoning kazyan

Without poe it makes less sense to activity tell someone

Okay

I feel like there was another one

Can't find it, oh well

Who is bussing worst

He's prime towncred right now even if red

I fail to see partners acting around him?

Idk let's try this
VOTE: Navi

In post 1890, unwnd wrote:Who is bussing worst

He's prime towncred right now even if red

I fail to see partners acting around him?

shouldnt your answer be gamma

In post 1813, unwnd wrote:I think if you flip red you're giving a stink eye to Gamma as a partner or if you're town Gamma looks terrible on your wagon.

So either way your last wishes will be heard.

big HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM vibes.

In post 1852, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:unwnd's read flip on you makes sense cuz he should know me enough that if I kill you here and you flip red I'm going to come for him tommorrow even if I'm dead

jsyk I’m not longer against your solve

god do we derail duckwagon to get unwnd?
thats so bad in isolation.

In post 1887, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 1583, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1210, Dwlee99 wrote:Pretty much all of them

Maybe not the poe one?

749 was because you pinged my tell about wagon logic fishing, and I wanted more info on it before passing hard judgment on the matter
764 was because you showed no signs of a PoE before (and obviously it was horseshit based on ensuing posts)
787 was trying to track if you were actually sorting or just spewing bullshit that sounds believable.
1144 is because I think Meg and you can be partners (tho tbh I also thought that in LN 235 and was wrong)

I’d like it if you could

actually engage

with any of them. Because so far you’ve basically blown me off which idk, feels a little weird for you especially with your read on me.

What is wagon logic fishing? I asked for obvious reasons - I wanted to understand why people were wagoning Kazyan.

I explained my poe was based on thinking town were wagoning kazyan

Without poe it makes less sense to activity tell someone

Okay

Wagon logic fishing is trying to draw out reasons to read if you want to be on a push or not
I think it’s doable by both alignments but scum maybe do it in a certain way that is distinct from how town do it

I do remember you saying kaz wagon was town but your logic kinda didn’t go any farther to my knowledge, and the kaz wagon is < half the plist so your poe is still pretty large that homing in on one player should not be solely due to it

I honestly dgaf about “activity telling”, my issue is your concept of Kid’s play was demonstrably dead wrong and you’ve failed to show any recognition of that
Why should I not think you’re scum when your sorting is absolutely half-assed and shallow?

In post 1895, Gorkington wrote:god do we derail duckwagon to get unwnd?
thats so bad in isolation.

why kill unwnd today when we can get him to write the sequel to War and Peace tomorrow?

i think that slip is worse than anything specific duck has done even if theyre probably just partners.

im always down for killing unwnd