Mafiascum.net

In post 1717, Gamma Emerald wrote:
me_irl

In post 1832, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:I thought faer hop onto Gamma was awkward

I feel like fae would've mentioned something about voting the same person as faer top scumread for most of the day (Auro)

General dissatisfaction with the leading wagons

In post 1859, the worst wrote:only scum have things to do irl. down with auro!

In post 1858, Something_Smart wrote:Wait, but he also pagetopped.

Shit, now I don't know what to do.

In post 1928, Thor Ragnarok wrote:Here is my plan:

night 3 vigilante or vengeful
1-shot vigilante or 2-shot PGO (active)
ascetic cop or bulletproof
draft cop or 1-shot watcher
doctor or roleblocker
universal backup or rolecop
neighborizer or voyeur
jailkeeper or tracker

If we have the setup on the left, this is what I believe we should do:
The night 3 vigilante should be left alive until night 3.
The 1-shot vig should not shoot if scum is voted out on day 1. If town is voted out, they should.
The ascetic cop should check who they think is scum but is unlikely to be voted out the next day.
The draft cop can check whoever they like to see if they have a role.
The doctor should protect a universally townread person.
The universal backup should wait.
The neighbouriser should target someone they think they will get along and solve with.
The Jailkeeper should target their biggest scumread.

If we have the setup on the right:
The vengeful should claim when death is assured and kill a consensus scumread.
The PGO should not activate and save themselves for later.
The bulletproof should enjoy themselves.
The 1-shot watcher should not do anything on the first night.
The roleblocker should target their biggest scumread.
The rolecop should target a scumread they're worried might be a cop.
The voyuer should target a high interest player.
The tracker should target their biggest scumread that won't immediately be voted out.

If we follow all of these actions, we can probably win this game from the sheer amount of roles that will be in town's hands. We just need to make sure foolish things aren't done like vigilantes shooting like heroes or cops checking players that will be voted out the next day anyway.

In post 1960, Thor Ragnarok wrote:I find it funny how sure you are!

Post-Edit: No, because your outrage here seems genuine, and attacking a possible townslip as scum is always risky if others disagree with you

In post 1982, Enchant wrote:No.

What is wrong in trying to coordinate town PRs?

In post 1974, Flea The Magician wrote:

In post 1683, the worst wrote:i totally made a tier list of last minute flashwagon prospects. omitted myself for obvious reasons, but i think i'd flatter myself to say that i rank in around b.

{thor}
{flea, manatee}
{miss midnight}
{ss}
{bee, pp}
{csf, titus, auro, house}

This doesn't answer my questions.

In post 1692, the worst wrote:i am but a slave to popularity.

VOTE: flea

back to enchant if this doesn't take off.

And this negates that previous post.

In post 1689, Bee wrote:Kinda down with Flea too but I think that'd be like drawing blood from a stone with how fae would react.

*waves*

In post 1983, Flea The Magician wrote:Thor what benefit do you think bringing back mechanical talk at this late stage of D1 brings to the game?
Given the amount of mechanics you've discussed over the day, why not bring this up earlier?
If you have read any of these games previously, how can you be so blatantly unaware of the setup mechanics on multiple fronts?

The timing of this makes me think that Thor and Manatee are aligned, having played with Manatee before she has frozen as scum.
VOTE: Manatee because shifting everyone onto thor is going to suck especially given I am read so low apparently.

In post 1615, Flea The Magician wrote:

In post 1553, the worst wrote:#1552 is just a funnier version of what I was going for!
Flea why not vote me here?

Also consider, why would I vote you here?

In post 1616, Flea The Magician wrote:

In post 1555, the worst wrote:do me !! actually fr though I'd like thoughts on flea or Thor or maybe Titus
or if you want something short maybe enchant?

Curious about your sudden interest in me :3

In post 1990, Miss Midnight wrote:I think Thor's post is pretty "scandalous", as it were, but I think it's just probably not from scum, or rather I think the mistake is genuine. Don't think scum tends to deliberately do things like that in the first place, much less plan it a day in advance and make it known that it's coming. Would require some creativity to even think of that mistake to pretend to make.

Think that focusing on scandalous things over scummy things is how a lot of games are lost. There are other things to push Thor on if you think he's scum than this.

In post 1928, Thor Ragnarok wrote:Here is my plan:

night 3 vigilante or vengeful
1-shot vigilante or 2-shot PGO (active)
ascetic cop or bulletproof
draft cop or 1-shot watcher
doctor or roleblocker
universal backup or rolecop
neighborizer or voyeur
jailkeeper or tracker

If we have the setup on the left, this is what I believe we should do:
The night 3 vigilante should be left alive until night 3.
The 1-shot vig should not shoot if scum is voted out on day 1. If town is voted out, they should.
The ascetic cop should check who they think is scum but is unlikely to be voted out the next day.
The draft cop can check whoever they like to see if they have a role.
The doctor should protect a universally townread person.
The universal backup should wait.
The neighbouriser should target someone they think they will get along and solve with.
The Jailkeeper should target their biggest scumread.

If we have the setup on the right:
The vengeful should claim when death is assured and kill a consensus scumread.
The PGO should not activate and save themselves for later.
The bulletproof should enjoy themselves.
The 1-shot watcher should not do anything on the first night.
The roleblocker should target their biggest scumread.
The rolecop should target a scumread they're worried might be a cop.
The voyuer should target a high interest player.
The tracker should target their biggest scumread that won't immediately be voted out.

If we follow all of these actions, we can probably win this game from the sheer amount of roles that will be in town's hands. We just need to make sure foolish things aren't done like vigilantes shooting like heroes or cops checking players that will be voted out the next day anyway.

In post 1941, Thor Ragnarok wrote:Ah, my impression was that we were bidding on which side of the draft we'd like, with the majority bid deciding the setup. I see what you mean now.

In post 1977, Flea The Magician wrote:

In post 1832, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:I thought faer hop onto Gamma was awkward

I feel like fae would've mentioned something about voting the same person as faer top scumread for most of the day (Auro)

General dissatisfaction with the leading wagons

Well it appears MM is at least able to extract some information.

The replace out of the hydra to a single player while still suspicious does confirm that Xtomx is really not feeling the game. My interactions with auro were good enough that I could bump them to a neutral read. Given also that end of phase is approaching it was time to begin consolidating and not riding what was essentially a vanity wagon with me being the sole participant.

damned if you, damned if you dont I guess.

In post 1985, Flea The Magician wrote:Oh and as for WWSF do, scum flea would absolutely vote enchant for that wagon.

Enchant either goes super townie and becomes untouchable, or super scummy.
Gamma can be raged or made apathetic and made to appear scummy.